Site Review: 2002 Olympics
Andy King writes: "If Olympic Web sites were an event, Salt Lake wouldn't even
take the bronze. Our review reveals some gnarly accessibility
moguls." There's another review of the site which mentions the many accessibility problems that the Sydney Olympics had with its website. The site doesn't appear to work at all with konqueror.
Heres the address: http://www.saltlake2002.com/
It renders fine in Mozzy, but at the bottom of the homepage:
;).
Plug-ins needed:
Flash
Windows Media
QuickTime
Adobe Acrobat
Not very viewable with Lynx
To me it makes perfect sense for the spec to be developed in partnership with the experts, as well as the deliverable since most people who write specs for large IT projects don't really know what they want.
"The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
Here's the reason the page doesn't display in Konqueror (part of page source follows - don't worry, it's short).
<script language=javascript src=/x/inc/get_guid.asp></script>9 fa989/www.saltlake2002.com/x/js/xtd_funct.js">& lt;/script> e 98dbd/www.saltlake2002.com/x/js/stdframe.js">&l t;/script>
<script language=javascript src="http://a799.ms.akamai.net/3/799/388/aa532497
<script language=javascript src="http://a799.ms.akamai.net/3/799/388/cf806351
<noscript>Javascript must be enabled to view this site.</noscript>
Note that this is almost ENTIRELY the content of the page. So, in short, it's a combination of hideous web design and one of the handful of javascript-related features (loading javascript from an alternate location via "src=") that isn't yet implemented in Konqueror.
Whatever happed to the "KISS" principle?...
Hacker Public Radio is our Friend
It is really sad that the IOC couldn't hire an independant site builder to create the site here.
IBM got out of the olympics business because it isnt worth the investment.
Nobody makes a big deal if the site can handle millions of hits; is usable; has accurate info. But if something goes wrong, you can bet that everyone will be talking about how bad it is, and how IBM screwed up.
There is a small chance of failure, but a very high cost (negative PR and spin-doctoring to undo it) when failure occurs. There is a high chance of success, but little rewards to reap in the end. It's just not worth the risk.