Slashdot Mirror


1.3GHz Duron Arrives

zebadee writes: "Tom's Hardware has the news that AMD have released a 1.3GHz Duron to the "mainstream PC market" that has been optimised for use with WindowsXP. The article also asks 'why haven't AMD gone with the MHz doesn't equal performance as they have done with the new XP/MP chips, as it would be assumed the market for these will be consumers who don't generally look at benchmark figures?' More information can be found at the AMD website."

8 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. XP ? Who cares - how about Linux performance by tph · · Score: 1, Troll

    Any details on this optimisation for XP?
    Will it boost my linux?!
    Anyone?

  2. Re:What?! by bonzoesc · · Score: 1, Troll

    Ssh. We all know Microsoft sets the standards with their software. When you're big, you can force others to do what you want them to. It's a hell of a lot easier than good programming practices.

  3. Re:A new processor, by Evil+Inside · · Score: -1, Troll

    MODERATORS ON CRACK!, heres a REAL PROCESSOR

  4. Re:A new processor, by Evil+Inside · · Score: -1, Troll

    FUCK LINUX

  5. TROLLS DEMAND EQUALITY by Carp+Flounderson · · Score: -1, Troll

    This is a petition for the Troll's bill of rights. Please reply to this to voice your support for a truely democratic public message board.
    We the trolls and troll supporters of the proclaimed slashdot democracy will no longer sit quietly while the trolls voices are being silenced by the oppressive slashdot programers. We demand a code change to allow troll supporters to filter messages out their view which are rated HIGHER than a threshold value. As we all know, the ignorant, elitist authors of the slash code have tried to silence the trolls by allowing non-trolls to filter out dissenting opinions based on a majority rules, herd mentality moderating system. This created a system where moderate opinions are swayed by the majority, creating a monopoly of influence. Slashdot readers have formed a two party political system. The parties are the Trolls and the Tacos (named after their prophetic leader, CmdrTaco). When you consider the slashdot community as a political machine, it becomes clear that the Taco's have tried to silence the Trolls with this flawed "democratic" moderating system.

    We demand a new message viewing moderation system where the individual user is able to select a political party if she/he desires. The following is a spec for an improved democratic system.

    - I as a troll may select TROLLS as my political preference. Then, when I read comments attached to an article, I may set my preferences to view messages moderated LOWER than a chosen value.

    - A Taco may select TACO as his/her political preference. When a Taco reads comments, he can choose to view articles moderated ABOVE a chosen value.

    - The Independant reader may choose to select INDEPENDANT as his preference. She/he may choose to choose to view the best of each party's comments. The preference setting would be something like
    abs(commentRating) >= userThreshold

    - Also, some planning should be done to add suport for >2 party system.

    To show support for this idea, submit it as a story to slashdot as often as possible, mail it to slashdot editors, and post it to as many slashdot articles as you can.

    --

    Color flashing, thunder crashing, dynamite machines.

  6. Re:What?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    If you really want fast crap, do it like this

  7. Re:This has to be seen, and I've karma to burn, so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    The experiment is a success. The same comment posted by an AC at 0 doesn't get touched, while this one went from +2 to -1 in about 5 minutes.

    What does it mean?

    1. Moderators are reading at +1 or above, against the moderation guidelines.

    2. Moderators won't "waste" points modding down points unless they can take some karma away. (Note: karma can be manufactured at will)

    ~~~

  8. Re:What?! [on/off topic] by monkeydo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Dude, the only thing that thread proves is that you are a complete fucking asshole. You obviously are just soliciting others to say Windows XP is crap, and when they don't agree with you you whine like a bitch. It's like talking to chicks they want to tell you about their problems, but they don't want them solved. Bitch bitch bitch. If XP doesn't work with your hardware don't use it. It doesn't really matter why or what anyone else thinks.

    You wrote:

    For all I know I could be older than
    windows. [I am]


    Since Windows 1.0 came out in 1985 I'm guessing you're a whopping 17 and still in high-school or you think Windows means Windows 95 and you're about 10. Otherwise you would have said somthing intelligent like "Show me some respect, I was in 'Nam dammit!"

    For anyone who needs a good laugh, read this guy's usenet thread. ROFLMAO.

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum
    The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian