Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.0 Release Plan Updated

loopkin noted that the dot is running a bit about the KDE 3 Release. Here's the release schedule, and as you can see, the upcoming weeks will be interesting. I guess I should figure out why my truetype fonts all broke on a recent update to debian unstable so that I can actually enjoy the new releases :)

18 of 307 comments (clear)

  1. Sporting new features by Shadowin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    KDE 3.0 has plenty of new features. However, I think they should work on fixing up the Klipboard. That's one thing Windows has I wish KDE had... a good clipboard system. I also hope they don't screw up Konqueror with the Smart "window.open" Javascript policy. Right now, I love being able to turn off those X10 pop-ups.

  2. Re:And the competition goes on... by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The KDE release timing has absolutely nothing to do with Gnome. Take a look at the 3.0 release plan -- it's been like this since at least last September. In fact, I wish KDE had got 3.0 out sooner - it was originally supposed to just be a port of KDE 2.2 to Qt 3, but some new features have snuck in. These range from the productive (much faster html processing, better dcop architecture), to the useful (much improved javascript support), to the useful and pretty (better file selection dialog), to the pretty and useless (alpha blending / transparent menus), to the totally useless (animated mimetype icons).

  3. Re:KDE will get the curious win9x users by glwtta · · Score: 5, Funny

    (win95,win98,winME,winXP - all bugfixes for win3.1)

    Damn, you're a fucking moron.

    Yeah, the AC is right - what the hell did they fix?? ;)

    (the awesome power or the winking face should negate most of the flamebait effect)

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  4. kioslaves by nick255 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On area I think KDE really excels is with kioslaves, which allow *any* KDE application access 'files' by a wide variety of means.
    *audiocd*samba*filesystem*ftp*gopher*gzip*http*i ma p4*nntp*sftp*tar
    To list but afew in the CVS.
    Plus people's homebrewed slaves:
    *shell commands*Nomad Jukebox*Digital camera*deleted files*over ssh
    for example.

    This can give rise to many useful applicatons. All KDE graphics programs instantly able to grab pictures off digital camera. Ripping CD by just dragging icons in the file browser. Seemless network browsing, just like Network Neighbourhood in Windows (ok, takes abit of setting up to work properly).

    Does gnome do anything similar. I know there is gnome-vfs, although haven't looked into what it does in too much detail.

  5. Gnome 2 vs KDE by CDWert · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who cares, isnt this a little like my kid can beat up your kid ????

    People bitch about all the libs with gnome , and QT with KDE, The folks over at KDE have a good team a good direction and a good system. I am a gnome user for many reasons, BUT, I wish success to the KDE team, a good plan is always the best start, even if you dont follow it at least it gives you a sense that you have a common goal :)

    We all in the *nix world of course know this not to be true, a common goal, Microsoft has one world domination, many of us *nix people are too worried about little things making it in, some out of ego some out of OUR neccesity.

    the KDE team has done a great job all along, whats good for KDE is good for GNOME, if they do it first we can say, well that works nice, or that suck lets not do it that way,

    Competition breeds the best, anything less is communism

    --
    Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
  6. Screenshots by CanadaDave · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Has everyone seen the new screeshots for KDE 3.0? It looks awesome. I like the new window style.

    One thing that I think really needs to improve with KDE is the speed. It is still much slower than Winblows if you ask me. But it's free, and very customizable, so I don't mind the trade-off.

    (I sure hope they've fixed the fonts system now. Whenever I try to change the fonts to anything other than default, all my fonts turn into A.D. Mono.) CanadaDave

    1. Re:Screenshots by cgleba · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been using KDE3 beta for a while now and I'm impressed. The rate of radical change between KDE1 and KDE2 is not the same as between KDE2 and KDE3 -- the feature slope seems to be tapering off and speed and stability are improving.

      A few notes that I've noticed:

      * KDE3 is faster then KDE2, however it is still not as fast as Windows.

      * Konqueror has had some major improvments in HTML renedering. Very nice. No major new features. With this release Konqueror is becoming my favorite web browser.

      * The regular expression engine is AWESOME. I can search web pages (and anything KDE for that matter) with regular expressions now. Very very cool feature.

      * There were some changes in the clipboard that I haven't quite figured out. . .middle-mouse-button pasting no longer works but I'm sure there's a config for it somewhere I havn't found yet.

      * Tool-bars are rippable now. Very cool.

      * A few new GUI pretty things

      * A few app crashes -- that's expected in Beta, though.

      Nothing radically new, however I appreciate and am impressed by the increase of maturity in KDE3.

      The only thing I have to wait for now is to have a few KDE apps mature a little more. I still use many gnome apps under KDE because they're a little more mature.

  7. Re:Fonts by free!arrow · · Score: 4, Informative

    Xft fonts are broken with Qt 3 and certain combinations of XFree86... to solve this: remove the LD_BIND_NOW=true from in front of the kdeinit line in the file "startkde". There is a significant performance penalty though.

    This is supposedly fixed in XFree86 4.2 but I am having problems getting it to work.

  8. New major distro release on horizon by chill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With the recent/upcoming releases of:

    XFree 4.2.0
    KDE 3.0
    Gnome 2.0
    glibc 2.2.5 (claimed compatible with GCC3)
    GCC 3.0.x
    2.4.x Kernel du jour

    I sense upcoming releases of next-rev-level distros.

    Now if it can only all be made to play nice together.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  9. Re:And the competition goes on... by tempfile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I care. There's a lot of things going on behind the scenes for Gnome 2. Gnome 2 is a major redesign. If you noticed, the sheer number of compound document/corba/etc architectures that appeared and died in the 1.0->1.2->1.4 cycle could only result in chaos.

    Gnome 2 is a big, big clean-up and for the first time Gnome will provide a stable, mature and reliable development architecture. KDE has had this since KDE 2, and just like KDE took off in terms of application and accessory development since the KDE 2 release, Gnome app development will take off once Gnome 2 is out.

    Let me explain: The major part of an environment like Gnome or KDE is not what is visible to the user, but the framework. Things like DCOP or KIO in KDE, orbit and bonobo in Gnome. If you want a pretty desktop with nifty features, all you have to do is write some applications which is minor work compared to designing and implementing an application interoperation framework. What was done for Gnome 1.4->2.0 was a complete framework rehaul. What was done in KDE 2.0->3.0 was mostly application development.

    I do agree that Gnome 2 is late. They should have ditched 1.4 and gone for 2.0 immediately after the 1.2 release, as the user-visible changes were minor. IMO.

    BTW, Gtk 2 offers more than just AA. It's also a completely new text rendering engine (Pango) that kicks the ass of everything else out there.

  10. Apple / kioslaves / video problems ... by timothy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the increasing use of kioslaves as an underlying KDE technology is great -- even if KDE developers don't use the word, it sounds to me just like Apple's lately hyped vision of computer as "digital lifestyle hub" (or however they phrase it).

    If the KDE stuff continues at current pace, it won't be lnog until anything with a USB or firewire jack (or any other port that my computer has or will sprout next year) should plug in and be recognized, transparently and as a regular-looking ("hey, there's a file!") entry in directories ...

    Any typical Linux distro comes with superior art tools already (GIMP, Kontour -- superior to anything that comes as part of a Windows or Mac OS install per se, though Photoshop is good for certain things that GIMP Is not), and with lots of tools for converting and listening to digital music. So music and 2-D art I think are pretty much down -- not finished or perfect or static, but already a compelling arguments for the family who wants to create pictures, edit digital photos, and stream music to baby's room.

    The big drawbacks now when it comes to the digital hub lifestyle thing to any free system I'm aware of is that both Windows and Apple have available superior codecs for video, and both now come with video editing software. (At least, that's what the silly XP commercials imply; is that true?).

    This really isn't a GNOME or KDE thing per se (hey, both are good, differences are wildly exaggerated, and they both live happily on the same machines), but kioslaves are impressive and tantalizing -- just wish there were video apps so I could one day open a window called "FIREWIRE VIDEO CAMERA" and be able to do the things that iMovie on a Mac provides.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  11. Re:Apple / kioslaves / video problems ... by LinuxGeek8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For Audio and Video:
    There is not yet a standard for Audio/Video.
    There are some codecs available, some players, but they all follow their own rules.
    Along with Gnome2 there will be a multimedia framework Gstreamer.
    It is not really aimed at Gnome, it is meant to be able to build apps on it, so Kde could use it too.

    There is discussion planned at Kde about how to deal with Multimedia. Somehow I hope they choose to build on Gstreamer, and support the building of one standard.

    --
    Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
  12. KDE is cool in general.. by Junta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But they really need to get over the Not-Invented-Here syndrome in so many places. One thing that stands out to me is that noatun is a crappy media player compared to other applications out there. Only video files I managed to get to play with it were MPG video files, and even then it crashed 8 times out of 10 (And this was KDE 2.2.2). In it they use mpeglib, which now works, but I wonder why they didn't use smpeg, which was more mature, from the start, was it simply because the lib was written by the author of kmpg, an older KDE media player? I wonder why they didn't have avifile support, that would be an easy way to play a *lot* more files. Compare noatun to, say, mplayer, which plays avi/asf, mpg, viv, rm (few), and mov, not to mention others. Within a couple of days using smpeg and avifile you can write a better media player than noatun...

    On a positive note, it is good to see the widespread planned use of .ogg files.. In modern systems there is no reason to use wav anymore, and .ogg gives the KDE team a nice, perfectly legal way of reducing filesize (unlike mp3, which probably would be better for this except for legal reasons, since ogg takes more CPU time to decode still)

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  13. I'll be impressed... by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...when someone begins to develop a truly original interface, instead of immitating Windows. Don't get me wrong -- Gnome and KDE are monumental achievements, and I congratulate their programmers. But what about all the really new and interesting ideas out there? Isn't creativity and exploration a goal of "free" software?

    How about:

    While chasing Microsoft, let's not forget to stop and smell the alternative roses...

    1. Re:I'll be impressed... by Arandir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      KDE and GNOME are *not* imitating Windows. They are imitating what works. It just so happens that Microsoft isn't staffed by idiots, so they tend to imitate what works as well.

      The first time I saw KDE (1.0) I thought "wow, it's my old OS/2 desktop!" You see, contrary to popular belief and the tripe they feed you in the press, Microsoft did not invent the GUI or the desktop. Xerox PARC did. It was copied by Apple Lisa then Apple Macintosh. OS/2 Warp had that style of desktop before Windows did. But Microsoft saw that the Mac and OS/2 Warp were *usable* interfaces and got worried. So they made a radical design change with the Win95 desktop.

      It's a pain in the butt creating a truly original interface. A major pain the arse. It's easy to come up with a concept, but making it usable is the hard part. I am glad that KDE and GNOME didn't decide to join the radical fringe and try to shove a new metaphor down people's throats. They stuck with what worked. The "computer as desktop" metaphor may not be the best metaphor, but it does work and people are used to it.

      If you don't like the default setup of KDE or GNOME, you can change it. Try that with Windows. If you don't like the main menu accessible from the panel, change it and make it a root menu. If you don't like the taskbar in the panel, make it a separate taskbar or use KasBar. Get rid of the panel entirely if you wish. If you don't like the file manager to be a plain window with icons representing files, then change it. Add a sidebar or/or shell to it. Use text view mode. Use a norton commander clone mode. Or use a different file manager completely. If you want menus to be on the top like in the Mac, just do it.

      This is the truly original interface that KDE and GNOME give you (original for Windows users, but not for Unix users): you are in complete control of your desktop. You get to decide how it will look, feel and work.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  14. K-Menu - Clean up by mattscape · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Although this might be a minor problem to many of you, I think it is essential for the first impression ...

    What I mean is:
    You have to clean up the KMenu. If you hit the K-Button in most distributions you get tons of applications, utilities etc ... In addition to that you often have a gnome entry that has all the gnome menus, with again tons of entries.

    What about small arrows like Windo$ has, so that you see just the recently used? Or a small, medium, and regular menu?

    I mean KDE is THE way to get people from other platforms to Linux. Why show them that "mess" with all these entries ?
    Show them a clean menu and give them later the option to add / see more.

  15. Broken TrueType fonts in new distro versions by nomis80 · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a reply to the comment on broken TrueType fonts on new Debian versions, I'd like to say that this happens on many other distros. The new RedHat 7.2 exhibited the same lower TrueType rendering quality over 7.1 as the new Debian. This is due to three patents that Apple filed concerning interpretation of TrueType bytecodes that are used for hinting small size characters. The FreeType project introduced in a configuration header a directive to disable/enable the patented bytecode interpreter. It comes disabled by default. Turning it on and recompiling may be considered infringement of Apple's patents if you haven't licensed them.

    Anyway, for those who can legally use it (ie. you don't live in the USA or have licensed Apple's patents), I've compiled FreeType with the patented bytecode interpreter enabled and made a RedHat 7.2 RPM which is available right here. This drastically improves the readability of antialiased fonts. Enjoy!

  16. Re:Clipboard by spitzak · · Score: 4, Informative
    I have not checked it yet but I believe the new Qt is using the seperate Clipboard/Selection that KDE and some versions of Motif used. The problem is it does not really work so well with older programs.

    There are two clipboards called "Clipboard" and "Selection". When you select a block of text it is immediately copied into "Selection". When you click with the middle mouse button it inserts the current contents of "Selection". When you cut/copy it with a command (such as Ctrl+C) it is copied to "Clipboard" but that is unchanged otherwise, and pasting commands (such as Ctrl+V) paste the contents of "Clipboard".

    This avoids confusing Windows users and still allows the drag&drop power of the older X selection and middle mouse click.

    However older applications did not know anything about "Clipboard". Instead both selecting text and copy commands changed the value of "Selection", and both middle mouse click and paste commands pasted the contents of "Selection".

    The result is that if you have program "New" and program "Old":

    Selecting text and pasting (dropping) it with the middle mouse button works both ways between the programs.

    If you "copy" in the New program, the Old program will not see it. Attempts to paste will get the last selection (this often is the same as the copied text but not always), the same as using the middle mouse.

    If you "copy" in the Old program, if you try to "Paste" in the New program you will not get it, instead you will get the last "copy" from a New program. You need to click the middle mouse button to "paste". This is by far the most annoying incompatability.

    Hopefully the "old" programs will vanish over time. I am trying to do my part...