Slashdot Mirror


Linux & the Business Desktop

Ulwarth writes: "Desktop Linux is running a feature documenting a mid-sized company switching to Linux on the desktop, like the City of Largo but this time in a corporate environment. Proof that it can be done - at least for businesses which need only the 'standard' office apps."

9 of 270 comments (clear)

  1. Good Article by 4of12 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I like the way that they describe the practical side of the transition - i.e., moving new users over instead of people comfortable to sit on the top of the learning curve that they've already scaled.

    My outfit is looking at Linux desktops in a more scientific and engineering environment.

    But we share a similar need to deal with the ubiquitous .doc, .xls and .ppt files that are endemic in the corporate world.

    I like their setup with KDE, but I've thought that using Evolution would be a nicer MUA.

    It's great they can do so well with StarOffice 5.2 that has its share of glitches and user interface problems.

    If only StarOffice 6 would finally come out!

    I believe that single product, SO 6, with updated filters for the aforementioned "standard" file formats and non-monolithic user interface, will do more to unleash a flood of Linux desktop migration than any other single product (unless AOL 9.0 includes Linux).

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  2. Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I run linux on all my desktops, I also run vmware with windows on it for office work. Since vmware/win2k/office2k currently uses less cpu than staroffice I'll stick with this. Works well, especially when windows has to reboot...

  3. Singapore Civil Service considers Staroffice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Singapore Civil Service considers switching to free Office Suites. Staroffice is a leading contender.

  4. Linuxes in a public library by joonasl · · Score: 2, Informative
    In a small Finnish city of Vaasa, almost all the custormer terminals very migrated to linuxes some time ago. The computer support staff say now that one Windows terminal (saved so that certain CD-ROMS could be viewed) is causing them more work than 70 linux machines. Mind, that these computers are used by the Joe/Jane Does who want to browse the librarys catalog, surf the web and do some word processing. The support people also say that most of the users are OK with the linux systems and don't need any more assistance than they did with Windows machines.

    ..and most of all, the city is saving 100 k$ per year..

    --
    "There is a terrorist behind every bush"
  5. Re:What about Exchange? by VP · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ximian Evolution is an Outlook replacement. To use it with Exchange 2000, you may need the Exchange connector.

  6. Re:What about Exchange? by Aloekak · · Score: 2, Informative

    *Shameless Plug*

    I am currently helping out on a project that is very comparable to Exchange. It's PHPGroupWare and it's evolving quite quickly.

    It is all web-based for now(some people are working on xml-rpc).

    It supports:
    • Calendar
    • E-mail
    • Addressbooks
    • Project Management
    • To Do Lists
    • File Manager
    • Plus a lot of other modules


    The applications are all modular, so they can be added and removed, and it's a very cool project. Check it out.
  7. I've done sort of the same thing here... by elefantstn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Our company has been hit by the recession relatively heavily -- our main product is a "luxury" item for most businesses -- so when we decided to finally put our salesman on computers and enter the 21st century, I suggested Linux desktops. I was met with some quizzical looks, but once I demoed my desktop and mentioned the key word "free," I was given the go-ahead.

    The idea is that there is only a steep learning curve for Linux if you're switching from another OS; if you've never used anything, there's no adjustment. Unlike the article's writer, though, we went with Gnome, for one huge reason: Evolution. Just like Outlook is key for businessmen who run Windows, Evolution makes keeping track of contacts, appointments, etc. a breeze for our salesmen. They do basic word processing with Abiword, look at some spreadsheets with Gnumeric, and browse the web with Galeon.

    I think what it comes down to is Linux's main strength is choice. My users do lots of planning, organizing, etc., so I centered their desktops around Evolution. TrustCommerce's people for the most part do very basic email, but a lot more document work, so their desktops are based around OpenOffice.

    Two more things: The killer app is gtcd. I cannot convey in words how amazed new users are when they put a cd in and the cd player looks up the tracklisting. (Yes, I realize many Windows cd players do this. Yes, I realize the new version of MP that comes with ME & above do this.) The other thing is that using Debian makes it all worthwhile. I mirror sid (the distribution we use) on the file server, which updates every night, and then when I upgrade workstations it goes over our 100Mb network. I cannot begin to describe how much easier my job is doing ssh workstation; apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade than walking around to desks and doing Windows Update.

    --
    If it ain't broke, you need more software.
  8. If you want RPMs, use Mandrake! by opkool · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes,

    Mandrake uses urpmi and it does just what cavemanf16 described. urpmi is a tool mostly like Debian's apt-get . You do :

    # urpmi gabber

    and it will install the latest Gabber with its required libraries.

    All from RPMs. And it has a GUI front-end called rpmdrake / MandrakeUpdate that let's you upgrade your system to latest security patch with the de facto, windows-like standard Click Next to continue kind of thing.

    Man! I love Mandrake for this. And it is also a hell of a nice desktop!

  9. Re:The obviously most pressing issue by Adam+Wiggins · · Score: 3, Informative

    Er, as the author of the article, I'm going to have to disagree with your assertation here. Search for the word "install" in Part II and you'll see that I only mention two install complaints: WordPerfect, which we chose not to use anyway; and StarOffice, which installs just fine, it just uses an annoying Windows-style "wizard" instead of a clean rpm install.