Slashdot Mirror


ElcomSoft Files For Dismissal Of E-Book Case

EconomyGuy writes: "ElcomSoft, the Russian software company accused of such evils as producing software to enable the blind to read legally obtained e-books, has filed for a dismissal of the charge that they violated the DMCA. Their main arguments seem to be what we anyone would expect: the DMCA is too vague, copyright holders have too much power, infringement of 1st amendment rights. CNN has all the details, as well as news.com. Interesting to note that there is no mention of the 'we didn't violate Russian law' argument." The efforts to get the case dismissed will no doubt continue.

7 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Good! by Ooblek · · Score: 2, Funny

    CAN YOU SPEAK LOUDER? I'm blind and my web-page reader is being drowned out by my elcomsoft e-book reader. That thing sure is a bag of wind!

  2. Online Rights: A Liberal Fantasy by Accord+MT · · Score: 3, Funny
    Your Rights Online...

    We've heard a lot of talk lately about freedom of speech and expression, and how it relates to the Internet. Some say you should be able to say whatever you want on the Internet, without the U.S. government's permission. Although this is an interesting idea, it's not going to happen--and I'll tell you why: You have no rights online!

    That's right, kids. No matter how much you would like to shout "virus" in a crowded chat room, there is nothing that gives you the right to do it! Examine, if you will, the two most important law documents in the world: The U.S. Constitutuion and the Bible. Neither of these documents even _mention_ the Internet. Some might argue that these texts were written long before anyone even knew of the Internet. True, but they were written by God Almighty, Who, of course, knew in advance that the Internet and other forms of electronic devilry would come to corrupt mankind.

    The concept that your rights to free speech, press and religion, apply online is an outrageous liberal myth, perpetuated by communist groups like the EFF and ACLU, which are funded by underground criminal hacker groups. By stealing billions of dollars in movies, music and software, all the while hiding behind the fantasy that they are supported by the Constitution, these pirates deprive media and software executives of the five or six Cadillacs they rightly deserve.

    I propose that we lobby Congress to shut down the Internet altogether. Most of what takes place online is illegal, anyway (software/media piracy and pornography). Then tracking down criminals would be a simple matter of following telephone and cable lines, and the concept of "online rights" would be exposed as what it really is: a laughable fantasy.

    Thank you.

  3. Re:Background Info by macsox · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and welcome to slashdot!

  4. I wonder... by gnovos · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let's say for a second that they LOST the case. Seing as they are in RUSSIA, what possible punishment could be handed to them by the courts?

    "Come over here so we can arrest you!" ???

    I wish Common Sense was still in common practice in the judicial system.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  5. Re:A question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I recognize the pattern.
    Although i needed a sighted friend to tell me what was at the goatse.cx link. Priceless.

    SIGME

  6. spelling by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please note, the correct misspelling of "copyright" is "copywrite", not "copywright".

  7. Re:Irony by glwtta · · Score: 3, Funny

    If the Americans have all these freedoms, why can't they see tits on the tele?

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi