Slashdot Mirror


mozilla.org Releases Mozilla 0.9.8

asa writes: "Today mozilla.org released the Mozilla 0.9.8 Milestone. New to this release are improved Address Book functionality, page setup(for printing), MNG/JNG support, native-style widgets on winXP and OS X, dynamic theme switching, improved BiDi support, speed, stability and footprint improvements, and much, much more. www.mozilla.org and www.mozillazine.org have the full scoop." The build I'm posting with (2002020305) is a little crashy, but most aspects are shaping up very nicely.

14 of 612 comments (clear)

  1. first `Mozilla has sucked for years` post by krog · · Score: -1, Troll

    wheee! i love OmniWeb

  2. I don't know if I like the additional features... by irony+nazi · · Score: 0, Troll
    Shouldn't there have been a code freeze or something by now?

    Come on!! Get to 1.0... this is taking forever!

    --

    Bringing irony to the Slash-masses
  3. I HAVE THE FIRST POST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I am so leet for getting the first post! I claim this first post in the name of our oppressed brother at raisethefist.com!! Stay strong and don't let the man get you down! Taco, we are coming for you next! When we catch you, you're going to get the worst dutch rub you've ever had! HAHAHAH! PH34R!!!!

  4. Cool Beans... by eric_aka_scooter · · Score: 0, Troll

    So when is 1.0 going to come out? It's seems like they've been in beta for 3-4 years... Eric

  5. Mozilla is a badge of Open Source failure by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 1, Troll

    It's seems like they've been in beta for 3-4 years

    it seems like they've been in beta for 3-4 years because they have. and even now at 0.9.8 they are cramming in new features, breaking things in the process. and even now at 0.9.8 Mozilla is unstable ("crashy" as the Users would say) and definitely not ready for prime time.

    Mozilla is a glaring example of why Open Sourcing a company project is no guarantee that anything good will come of it. mod me flamebait if you must, but i maintain that as long as OSS is not as featureful OR as stable as its propietary competition, no one, but NO ONE will use it.

  6. Re:Mozilla Nighlies forever! by cygnus · · Score: 1, Troll
    but for the most part it is way stabler than Navigator ever was.



    does that make it more better?



    sorry, couldn't resist.

    --
    Just raise the taxes on crack.
  7. Our tortured dead scream out in agony! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    The dead cry out for justice:

    1. Kill all Arabs.
    2. Kill all Muslims.
    3. Kill all Mohammedans.
    4. Kill all Towel Heads.
    5. Kill all Camel Jockeys
    6. Kill all Islam.
    7. Nuke their countries to hell.
    8. Nuke them again.
    9. Death to Islam.
    10. I piss on Mecca. I wipe my ass with the Koran. I spit upon Mohammed.

  8. Microsoft's solution to all your problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    You may find this interesting. At this link you can see what Microsoft's ultimate goal is, the source of their great profitability. Enjoy.

  9. Re:The most important fix... by RMSIsAnIdiot · · Score: -1, Troll

    Wow! Glad to hear that, but, seriously, IE has done this since version 4. That was like way back in '98. Ahh the good old days. Glad to see that it only took the Mozilla folks 4 years to catch on. No sarcasm intended, either.

    --

  10. Re:What about performance on low-end machines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I use IE 5.5 + Win 98 on a P/133 w/ 32 MB ram. A tad sluggish, but it's faster and more reliable than Netscape 4.x.


    Thats good. Because there is no such thing as Netscape 4.x.

  11. Re:What about performance on low-end machines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    I use IE 5.5 + Win 98 on a P/133 w/ 32 MB ram. A tad sluggish, but it's faster and more reliable than Netscape 4.x.
    Thats good. Because there is no such thing as Netscape 4.x.
    wtf?!
  12. mozilla.org Releases Mozilla 0.9.9.9.9.9.9 by Marcus+Brody · · Score: -1, Troll

    Posted by timothy on Tuesday December 27, 2006, @04:22AM

    from the Future Dept.

    Some twat writes: "Today mozilla.org released the Mozilla 0.9.9.9.9.9.9.9 Milestone.
    New to this release are improved IE9 interopability, Mac OSIX support, and much, much more. www.mozilla.org and www.mozillazine.org have the full scoop." The build I'm posting with (2006122712) is a little crashy, but most aspects are shaping up very nicely.

  13. Behold, double standards!! by shaunak · · Score: -1, Troll

    "The build I'm posting with (2002020305) is a little crashy, but most aspects are shaping up very nicely."

    When it comes to Open Source, slashdot editors will always look at the silver lining on a huge cloud. Mozilla is a "LITTLE CRASHY". God forbid if any closed source software should crash once or twice, suddenly 't would become "UNUSABLE", "UNSTABLE" or something even worse - "TAKEN OVER BY MICROSOFT" .

    --
    -Shaunak.
  14. Re: rendering improved?(after 9.4) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    If thay can't get a SIMPLE thing like rendering right

    A lot of jackasses think Mozilla's rendering is screwed up. On most pages that look bad in Mozilla, it's actually IE's rendering that's screwed up, and the web developer has used IE to test with. You see, there're these little things called standards . . .