Slashdot Mirror


Tom's Hardware Reviews the Xbox

steddyj writes: "Tom's Hardware released this article which looks deep into the Xbox, its peripherals, and just about everything from every angle, and compares it to the PS. Incredibly detailed article."

5 of 357 comments (clear)

  1. Where is Linux for XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's been out for ages. Why no version of Linux for the box yet? I remember lots of little penguin people claiming it wouldn't take long to crack the box and get their favorite kernel running on it. So where is it? Or are Microsoft actually smarter than the smelly unwashed masses?

    1. Re:Where is Linux for XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "porting the code over will be childs play" Yes, of course it will. And there you will be, leading the pack... I look forward to seeing your name gracing the credits for the first port...

  2. Tom's Problem by zerocool^ · · Score: 5, Funny

    The only problem


    with Tom's hardware is


    the ammount of information

    that they display


    per page, in order

    to get as many
    advertisment

    views as possible

    .

    --
    sig?
  3. What a badly written article... by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let me quote:
    "The cache has been reduced from 256 to 128 KB/sec, which shouldn't be overloaded. "
    ???
    "As far as memory is concerned, the PS2 has a 250 MHz processor, even if the two are not comparable. "
    Huh?
    "The wait times in dedicated programming on a dedicated platform have nothing to do with the PC, where the CPU spends its time fishing for information, in every sense of the word. To better understand this, it's enough to compare it with the Mac, which, because of its more closed architecture, also makes do with less cache. "
    ??? I stopped reading there. I already have a headache. :-)
    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  4. Re:MS Tactics by jmccay · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't think Microsoft studied the history of the gaming systems market. Anybody remember some of the failed systems. I beleive there was the NeoGeo. The wasn't a whole lot of games out for the system. THe graphic rocked for the time, but the just wasn't that many games. (Of course, I am also ignoring the high cost of the system.) Sega also had a few failed systems becuase they just didn't have the games.

    The PS II has been estimated to have 400+ games including PS I & PS II games. I know the XBox doesn't have that much games out. There are more likely to be games I like when there is a lot of them. I know I am thinking about getting a PS II. I won't consider an XBox. It just isn't worth playing the waiting game for games!

    --
    At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that