Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Functional Languages Under .NET/CLR

Posted by Hemos on from the fuel-for-the-fire dept.

Numen writes "With all the talk of .NET being thrown about there is a common factor occuring through many discussions, namely the claim that .NET will be unable to address functional and logic languages such as Prolog and LISP. To this end I would like to drawn peoples' attention to two resources, that shown how this may well be a non-issue, and to ask, does this change anybodies mind? "

2 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. GNOME and .NET change of heart by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 4, Funny

    After reading Miguel's long response to the Register article, I've really changed my mind about .NET architecture. I think I'm going to get a book and start learning it, maybe try to contribute to his effort.

    --

    Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
  2. boy, good thing by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 3, Funny

    all four Prolog and LISP Win32 applications developers were getting nervous.

    nice solution to a non-issue.