NY AG Sues Network Associates Over License Terms
An Anonymous Coward writes: "Excite is running an article about how New York is suing McAfee over what it considers a restriction of free speech because McAfee does not allow customers from publishing reviews without prior approval from McAfee. From the article: 'In one instance, Network Associates demanded a retraction of an unfavorable review published in the online and print magazine Network World, citing a clause on its Web site that prohibits product reviews without permission, the lawsuit alleged.'"
This is a statement found in many products, most notably oracle. You can't publish Oracle benchmarks without Oracle's permission. Hopefully these rules will be rendered moot by this case.
In .au, the goverment regulates Lease Agreements for housing, home building contracts, home buying contacts, finance contracts all to protect the consumer and give them a minumum set of rights.
Why don't the goverment do the same thing with software EULAs?
I vote to interview a lawyer for the next Q&A. Frankly between these EULA arguments and the BSA stuff in the last article I'm frankly VERY confused :(.