Video with Depth
Lifewolf writes: "A new technology from 3DV Systems uses pulsed infrared illumination to capture depth information for every pixel of a video stream. This allows for neat tricks like realtime keying without need for color backgrounds. JVC is already selling a product based on this, the ZCAM."
Can you imagine using this technology to insert your favorite politician in a porn video? George Bush Does Dallas.
Used within a survellance camera, it could detect motion without getting tricked by that tree near the air vent.
It could also be used in surgical situations where a specialist located in another state can more easily study facets of the video being provided to him (cutting out noise, if you will).
You could do some really weird video editing where you could create a scene of a person standing in a verdant field in the middle of summer with snow falling within his 'mask'.
Items recorded in this way (presuming the mask is also recorded) could perhaps be admissable evidence that helps the court focus on a specific action that might otherwise get missed.
It might also provide a less-expensive way to make 3-D videos. Precursor to holographic movies?
And so it goes.
Normally, when you want to key in a false background in a scene, you need to have a constant color in the background (Hence the use of blue and green screens). If the background isn't flat, then you either have to go at it with photoshop frame by frame, or use expensive border tracking software which is less than perfect. You could spend hours setting up a scene just right, with screens placed in all the right places, making sure that there is nothing else that is the same color as the key, and planning camera angles for an action sequence, not to mention the struggle of getting the keying to work just right.
with this new technology, however, you could film an actor just about anywhere with very little preperation, and key him/her out based on depth AND color (some situations may need both), and easily pop new things both in front and behind the actor. It could save movie studios a lot of time, effort, and money for doing special effects, especially after you consider how easily it would be to generate a virtual stunt double from the 3d mesh (film the actor from a few angles, and merge the resulting 3d wireframe. Voila, perfect model down to the wrinkles in the skin)
"Once you capture live action footage in object video format, you can not only make it more visually engaging, but also sell advertising right in context of the live event."
Great, now you won't be able to distinguish between the show you're watching and the advertisement. Now when I'm watching TechTV, I can look forward to Britney Spears bouncing thru with a Pepsi at 30 second intervals.
--It's Pimptastic!--
IMHO, this technology would rather do the contrary. It makes photo forgeries so damn easy: no afternoon-long sessions with the gimp to get exact contours of people to delete from or insert into picutres: just use the ZCAM's distance keying and you get instant masks. The example given was scary: a business meeting, from which they could edit out people at will. The ideal tool for anybody that wants to rewrite history. So, forget about photos staying admissible as evidence in court.
Say no to software patents.
The biggest problems are computational; it's hard to do a good job of stereo reconstruction at high frame rates in real time. It's by no means impossible, and there are commercial out there that do it, like this one.
Two cameras aren't really necessary, either, if your camera is moving in the scene. It's possible to recover both the movement of a camera and 3-d information about a scene just by moving a camera through it. Googling for structure from motion is a good place to start looking into those techniques, and there's a pretty cool page about one groups application here.
In short, this company may have an interesting prodect (depending on cost and more details on the error characteristics) but this isn't something that couldn't be done with existing methods.
Also, as an aside, I find it interesting that they take a swipe at laser rangefinders as requiring a spinning mirror, when just about all IR cameras have a spinning "chopper" as an integral part of the exposure system...:)
I don't believe nobody has posted about MPEG4. This is very interesting for that -- film using this, and you can encode into MPEG4 format with /huge/ compression almost automatically. The hard part about MPEG4 is object detection; this makes that almost free.
-Billy