BT Pushing Hyperlink Patent
There's been a lot of new publicity lately about the British Telecom trying
to defend a patent that they claim means
they invented hyperlinking. Currently they are going after Prodigy for
using hyperlinking back in the early eighties. We've
mentioned
this one before, but it really looks like they are going to
push it. Insane.
... to say BT sucks.
-1 redundant for the rest please.
thats a crazy idea!!!
I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
"All of your links are belong to us"
First Post!
I did, and i killed his pet penguin too! No more linux, its dead along with BSD, BeOS and Princess Margret!
The English newspaper Sun has a worth and informative article about the BT patent in its Internet section.
Excellent troll. First class.
-- Brian
You know when you get really bored at work and so you decide to scrape all the finger-cheese off the keys on your keyboard?
I've got a patent on that, I have.
What's next? Gutenberg's relatives filing a lawsuit against O'Reilly for printing books without paying royalties for using his invention?
Patents are evil (well, a lot of them).
Probably nothing.
Maybe they are thinking that Prodigy won't be able to afford such good legal counsel as BT and may lose the case. Even if BT shouldn't win, they could win, and that would be bad...
Personally, I don't think they have a snowballs chance in Hell, but the court of law is a funny place. Look what happened to OJ Simpson. That case was open and shut at the beginning too...
It would bode lots of companies to rally around Prodigy and give them a hand with legal costs. Even the EFF might be interested in this one.
-WolfWithoutAClause
"Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"Are you an idiot? Gore never fucking said that he invented the internet. Even if he did, that joke wasn't funny the first 9 trillion times it appeared on Slashdot. What makes you think it's funny now? Please go away.
Mod parent down, if only because he didn't bother to read the story he linked. The story clearly states that the demo was done at Stanford. Furthermore, other comments have already covered this link without such blatant factual errors...