Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.0 Beta 2 is out

Subject says all - the next beta of KDE 3.0 is out, after a short delay. You can find the downloads at this announcement. Click below to read more details about this version. One of the most important things that the Konqueror teams wants from people are test cases of your regulary visited pages, where Konqueror either fails to render or render things incorrectly, and submit it using KDE's Bug Tracking system. URL's will not be helpful as it takes lots of time to strip a page from all the HTML code in order to find the actual problematic part of the web page.

Just to save the search for some people: Mandrake, SuSE, Slackware and Tru-64 binary packages are available now. Others will be available soon. Source code is of course available also.

4 of 316 comments (clear)

  1. The Usual... by Lethyos · · Score: -1, Troll

    KDE/GNOME blows ass. Any fuckwads using KDE/GNOME should switch over to GNOME/KDE. Why do they even bother developing KDE/GNOME anymore anyway?

    --
    Why bother.
  2. Re:Who Really Needs 3.0? by Mr.+Piccolo · · Score: -1, Troll

    Absolutely nothing. It still isn't better than Windows XP home edition.

    --
    Glückwünsche, haben Sie Slashdot ermordet, indem Sie zum korporativen Druck beugten und Subskriptionen einlei
  3. trolltech's QT by gol64738 · · Score: 0, Troll

    not a troll here. just read a little more.
    i never liked kde 1. when kde 2 came out, i was very impressed. but after using it for 2 months, i've gone back to ximian gnome.

    you know what? it's not kde that is blah, it is QT that makes kde blah. kde is a very well put together framework of a desktop, but building it on top of QT just ruined it.

    this reminds me of the amiga days. i found it hard to go from the soft, warm looking amiga desktop to the cold, filmy ibm win 3.1 desktop.

    i also find it hard to go from a colorful, crispy gnome desktop to a boring, blah kde desktop (i know about kde-look.org, been there, downloaded all kinds of icons, brackgrounds, etc.)

    BUT IT'S NOT KDE THAT IS MY PROBLEM, IT IS QT!

    qt, well, just sucks.

  4. Re:KDE - Beta is stable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Some KDE Myths.

    KDE Myth: Koffice owns, Kspread, Kword..they own, Gnome-office sucks.

    Truth:
    o Gnumeric has made some huge steps in the last 6 months, with the
    semi-intergration of Guppi (graphing)...its a very stable Spreadsheet
    application, offers many features that kspread dreams of. More Functions,
    more file filters,.. Kspread is more like a budget/cutdown version of
    Gnumeric.

    To put it blutantly KDE toolbars and general gui design are/have always
    been a mess.

    o Abiword also offers similar benefits of Gnumeric (features and File
    Filters) hey does Kword have a good import/exprt RTF?! alpha-quality? wtf?
    How long has Kword been in-existence? and they still cant properly render
    RTF still? Even the list of known filters (export and import) available
    looks very sad. http://www.koffice.org/filters/status.phtml

    Considering Abiword is also being developed for many other platforms, its
    done pretty well so far. Can you say WYSIWYG?

    o Kivio doesnt offer everything you would want, and if you want specific
    stencils, you have to fork out for them...Is this where FreeSoftware is
    going? We get cutdown versions of a product,... DIA isnt bound to a
    company hard bent in making a profit. So when DIA starts employing some of
    these Stencils, what happens then? you spent $$$ for nothing?

    http://www.thekompany.com/products/kivio/stencil s. php3

    KDE Myth: Konq ownz mozilla, netscape etc...

    Truth: Mozilla is truely more standards complient, as of late 0.9.4+
    series, The Mozilla engine is really starting to shine now, Konq has
    always had a hard time rendering any DHTML/Javascript, even with some
    webpages the fonts are screwed.
    Mozilla isnt Perfect, but hey, everything renders properly. Konq trys to
    hard to be "Internet Explorer" on the linux desktop, Its time to
    completely drop the KHTML shit, If theres a better, more mature
    engine...use it. KHTML was once needed, now its not.. And if you want to
    Compare Gnome Galeon,..I dare you.

    Nautalus was once critised as being a slow, dog, rah rah.. well it was,
    yeah it was slow,...but it has improved, but it seems kde users still like
    to think that. Well if it makes you happy. Nautalus is very themeable

    http://jimmac.musichall.cz/screenshots/ximian-so ut h-metatheme.jpeg Its a
    welcome change away from the Windows File Manager look.

    KDE Myth: GTK+ is just damn ugly

    So you havent tried the abundance of GTK+ themes? cleanice? eazel?
    thinice? pixmap?
    Yeah, Gtk themes that have been around longer than kde2... and with the
    upcoming release of GTK2, themes are getting better and faster. Themes
    under KDE just dont look "pretty". Even Gnome icons are better. So
    customising Gnome to look differently isnt that hard..however KDE just
    looks like that, Mosfet just looks tacky.

    KDE Myth: We have all the cool appz. QT/KDE rulesss!

    Oh really? So lets now count Evolution, GIMP, Red Carpet, Xchat, XMMS,
    Galeon, Balsa, Gnumeric, Pan, Abiword, mplayer, Glade, Anjuta ...Gnome/GTK
    has plently of cool apps.

    KDE Myth: Gnome is loosing, its dead, just use KDE.

    Well considering most new distros have KDE preinstalled as default, ie,
    Mandrake, Lindows, Caldera, Corel, Suse ..and some other I missed out, its not
    surprising Gnome is losing *some* support, But with Ximian and Redhat
    Gnome/GTK will keep on living. QT is hardly community developed, GTK+ has always been community developed...and thus we as the linux community we _should_ support it.