ZeroKnowledge's Freedom Server Code Available
hey writes: "The Register reports that
Zero Knowledge's Freedom Network source code is now available." This seems to be part of CodeCon, which is now underway in San Francisco. You can't use the code for commercial gain, but I could see a non-profit network springing up...
This is the FP! Yeah!
aihaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa fp?!?!?
Zero Knowledge... sounds a lot like me....
gayness popping up!
fp
Fuck Yeah!
Fuck em if they can't take a joke. Montreal, boot those asswipes out. Sexah French girls, invite me into your beds.
Go here, friend.
Behead me if you will, but people: Futurama sucks.
Fags have not hidden the fact that they target children (e.g., in
...that federal, state, and local governments and
schools, boy scouts, girl scouts, etc.). The reason is simple: they
want to teach children, at a young age, that it is OK to be gay; that
there is nothing wrong with homosexuality as an innocent, alterate
lifestyle; that people who engage in sodomy are to be respected in a
"multi-cultural" and "diverse" sense. There is no better place to do
this than in schools. If they can help raise a new generation of
children who have respect for different sexual orientations, then,
they think, their lives will be easier. If they can convince
impressionable children that sodomy is perfectly normal and natural,
they will no longer have to suffer the stigma of being homosexual. Of
course, fags can't have children through their perverted activity, so
they must target the children of other people. Whether they recruit a
child to that lifestyle (through the guise of helping "questioning
youth"), or whether they recruit a child to the ranks of those who
believe that sodomy is a normal thing to do, they are just as guilty.
To accomplish the goal of instilling "it's OK to be gay" into the
nation's youth, fags believe that homosexuality should be discussed
starting in grade school. Of course, nothing bad should be said about
it. Instead, it should be portrayed as "just another lifestyle."
Children should see men with men, and women with women, and think
that that is a good thing. In California, new guidelines are being put
in place to teach children about "alternative sexual lifestyles." In
the United Kingdom, a teaching guide called "A Whole Approach to Sex
Education" presents techniques for teachers to "discuss with children
as young as 4, homosexuality and anal sex." In America, the recent
film "That's a Family!," which targets children beginning at age 8,
includes several children speaking about their "moms" or their
"dads." One girl says, "My moms, Angie and Lee, are lesbians. That
means they only like men for friends and they want to be in a
relationship with other women." Another says, "My dads are gay, and
gay means when two men or two women love each other. It's sort of just
like having a mom and dad who love each other. It's just that it's a
man and a man or a woman and a woman." The director of the film said,
"There is an enormous amount of education that needs to be done with
kids so that they come to understand that gay is not a bad word but is
actually an adjective that describes how real people live and how
real people in their school communities live."
Later on, as children begin taking sex ed classes, fags want
homosexual sex to be discussed. The Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education
Network has been at the foundation of this kind of perversion. The
Washington Times (12/4/2000) had this to say: "The influence of GLSEN
on public schools can be seen in the San Francisco Unified School
Distrist, which is considering several lesson plans in which
homosexuality and tolerance are the subjects. One lesson plan, titled
'Jesse's Dream Skirt,' centers on a 'boy who likes to do things
differently than most other boys.' Questions following the story
include: 'Do you think Jesse wants to be a girl?' Karen Holgate of
the conservative watchdog group Capitol Research Institute says these
lesson plans teach children that if their parents disagree with
homosexuality, they're 'homophobes.' During a 'youth-only, ages
14-21,' workshop titled 'What They Didn't Tell You About Queer Sex
and Sexuality in Health Class,' students were taught sexually explicit
techniques. 'Children are being victimized by these groups, and their
parents don't even know it,'says Parents Rights Coalition's Brian
Camenker." The National Education Association (NEA) has the
following resolutions for the 2000-2001 school year. Notice that not
only do they want to portray fags as respectable people (as if
engaging in sodomy deems you worthy of respect), but they encourage
the government to pass laws making "verbal violence" illegal. That
means that if you believe and say "God hates fags," that should be a
crime. Discrimination and stereotyping based on...sexual orientation
must be eliminated." "(Public school) plans, activities, and programs
must -- Increase respect, understanding, acceptance, and sensitivity
toward...gays and lesbians." "Similarities and differences
among...sexual orientation...form the fabric of a society." "(NEA)
urges that formal sex education should include...respect for
individual differences...Such programs should include information
on...diversity of sexual orientation...incest...and problems
associated with pre-teen and teenage pregnancies." "(NEA) deplores
prejudice based on...sexual orientation." "(NEA) is committed to
elimination of discrimination based on...sexual orientation." "(NEA)
believes that...verbal violence against...sexual orientation...is
deplorable...and
community groups must oppose and eliminate hate-motivated (verbal)
violence." We encourage you to take a look at the NEA and GLSEN web
sites. If you are worried about fag influence on your children in
school, make sure you contact the schools about it, and make sure your
children are well-versed in the Bible. Otherwise, you're to blame.
Canadians don't know shit
We need someone to host an exit server at HavenCo!
you see canadianess popping up, which is far worse.
Cut and paste troll - as most of Metrollica's comments are. This one is from the remailer FAQ.
Yes, moderator, someone with troll in their name is probably a troll. Trolls don't deserve +1 bonuses.
Who wants to bet he copied and pasted that from somewhere? In fact, I never even read the article and it seems clear to me its fraudulent.
Sheesh. Check some BIOs out, people:
"Grant me the authority to suppress the arguments that I cannot win, the audacity to argue the points that I think I can win, and the trollishness to manipulate information so that no one can tell the difference"
This had better hit metamod soon.
+4 for a troll copied from a website, no doubt? Christ, are you people blind?
Idiots, the lot of you moderators, plain dumb idiots.