Slashdot Mirror
Hope for MIPS, From Toshiba
CDWert writes: "EE Times is reporting MIPS is teaming up with Toshiba, to develop their next generation 64 bit proccesor. After all the Itanium Speak and X86-64 talk going on here and the premature predictions of MIPS demise, through their inability to fund the next round I thought this would be refresing to MIPS fans." According to the article though, there will be no product until at least a year from now.
I have too much Karma. Fuck moderators.
<^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
I hearby claim this first post in the name of the Queen of Spain!!
You should team up with the Turd Report for some truly entertaining reading!
After getting used to the Free Software world, it made me feel physically sick to see "Gimme $20 or this program won't work" kind of greed in action. I can't believe so many people are content with that arrogant attitude...
mozilla users - new bug!
J'raxis sux0rz my cox0r.
you got it
I have to ask this question: Is it me or is the modding system here really subjective. Seems to me that a chosen few always get fours and fives while the rest of us wind up with ones and twos...or zeros. It doesn't really bother me too much, as I post to express my opinions...BUT..it implies that most here are dumber then the 'chosen few'..which to me seems to NOT be the case....
I presonally believe you should not accounce a product (or whatever) until it's pretty much ready for release. There is way to much vaporware announced each year. Yes, things take time, but until you're ready, please keep quiet. Announcing a product a year before it's ready is like taking orders before a product is built. Not a good idea.
my karma=10, why can't I moderate?
Riding on the ridiculous "war on terror" frenzy, Israel is now preparing her own Final Solution to the Palestinian Problem.
Today, the war criminal Ariel Sharon and his cabinet decided to "intensify" the attacks.
Hello? Of course you get suicide bombed when you oppress the shit out of your neighbours. Idiots. Sharon should be next in line to face charges at the war crimes tribunal in Hague.
I presonally believe you should not accounce a product (or whatever) until it's pretty much ready for release.
Never been in business, have you?
I've worked for a few start-ups, including one that has lasted for almost four years now. In the early stages, a company isn't fueled by sales, usually because there isn't really anything to sell yet. In the early stages, a company is fueled by investment and good press.
The only way to keep investors interested in your company, so they'll keep giving the money you use to keep the lights on and pay your people, is to keep the buzz coming. Investors-- an I'm not talking about VCs here-- want to invest in companies that have a lot of potential in the marketplace, and you generate that potential through press releases, demos, and (sometimes) unsubstantiated announcements.
It's not vaporware at that stage; vaporware is a product that purports to be ready, but isn't.
I dont want to sould old but.... I remember using a MIPS compiler back in my CS hayday (1994)for one of my CS courses.
MIPS is a great assembly language.
In any event, I got an A in my MIPS compiler course. How easy
I'm playing the worlds smallest violin! Can you hear it, Mr. Six Digit User Number?
My perception is that the posts that get modded high up are the ones which are: /. frontpage to check if there are any new stories. Or in the *NIX tradition, make a script to do it for you and alarm you when a new story has been published.
1. Reasonably intelligent
2. Among the first, say 20-30 comments posted.
According to this hypothesis, other people need not be dumber than the ones which consistently get high mod points, it's just they aren't obsessive-compulsive-/.-reloaders. So to reiterate my point, to get consistently high mod points:
1. Spend a lot of time hitting reload on the
2. Post a reasonably informed opinion.
3. Do it quickly before your post drowns among all the other comments.
The almost religious "must please the shareholders" attitude is particularly irritating. Fuck the shareholders if they don't like the way you run YOUR business!
I guess you've never been a shareholder, then. Do you realize that the shareholders actually own the company? So if there is more than one shareholder (other than you) then technically it isn't exclusively "YOUR" business. Thus even if you're Bill Gates, unless you hold the majority shares, if nobody likes you, the next shareholder vote is going to land your on your arrogant ass.
With that aside, I'm sure there is room for discussion on why the shareholders might want to kick you out. Perhaps you aren't making any money for the company (in other words running the company into the ground while still happily collecting a paycheck), or perhaps you make decisions without getting educated opinions first.
Remember, the shareholders own your job.
It's like Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest, CSA, may or not have said: You have to get there "fustest with the mostest."
Is there some physiological reason for this?