Slashdot Mirror


Nokia Set-top Boxes to Ship with AmigaDE

AtlasT writes: "Amiga Inc. announced today that Nokia will be shipping their Linux-powered "Mediaterminal" STBs with AmigaDE pre-installed. These news along with the previously announced cooperation with Sharp for their Zaurus PDA make the future of Amiga Inc. look a bit brighter indeed. What we who use computers more often than PDAs and STBs wonder is when we'll see the release of AmigaOS 4 and new machines. If you'd like to have a pre-view of AmigaDE and some applications you can buy the AmigaDE Player for Linux or Windows. I wouldn't mind running games like Payback, a GTA2 clone, on a PDA!" The Nokia Media Terminal was supposed to be launched in the second quarter of 2001, then by the end of 2001, now... who knows. Update: 02/23 21:24 GMT by M : It seems the Mediaterminal is already available but expensive.

11 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. Too expensive by Sircus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With a 566MHz Celeron and that amount of RAM (64Mb), they won't reach the price point which would lead to mass-market uptake. There's also way too many connectors, etc., etc.

    Having worked on a set-top box project, the prime goal seems to be cost-reduction on a per-unit basis. Various developments are in the pipeline which will enable PVR/MPEG/DVD/DVB boxes to be made at a cost point where cable and sat providers can afford to subsidise them to a zero cost. This is where the market lies for these things, and the first company to succesfully bring such a box to market will be the one who wins the big share of that market.

    We've been hearing about STBs for a long time. Projects like these, with or without Amiga software, are the reason we hear a lot and see nothing.

    Amiga have been claiming to have deals with STB manufacturers for a long time now. Aside from press releases and cryptic mails from Fleecy Moss, I've never seen anything solid come from any of these.

    --
    PenguiNet: the (shareware) Windows SSH client
  2. Do you believe? by mbrubeck · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe in the second coming of Amiga! Death to the nonbelievers!

    1. Re:Do you believe? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 3

      Actually, no.

      Amiga Inc. is the first time since the Commodore bankruptcy that Amiga has been self owned and run with some sort of direction.

      Escom AG only wanted the Amiga brand name. Gateway the same. And QuickPak (who never actually got their hands on the name anyway) had their own uses for Commodore's Intellectual Property as well.

      What it boils down to is that all of the previous "Buyers" of the Amiga name didn't actually aim to do anything with the company other than exploit the Amiga community.

      Amiga Inc. have a vested interest in the ressurection of the Amiga. Amiga Inc. IS the Amiga.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    2. Re:Do you believe? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, I was never much for such advocacy no matter what the system is. Though the Amiga WAS in most ways superior to the MAC, and most of the Mac emulators did much better than just 3% performance increases over a real Mac. Some of them were head and shoulders over a real Mac, but that's unimportant to what I'm going to say.

      In the end I was never one to force any of my Amigas to run MAC software. If I had wanted a MAC I would have bought a MAC.

      That sort of advocacy annoyed me be it from other Amiga users, from MAC users, or more recently, from Linux users.

      What am I now? Certainly my Amigas, though they all mostly work, are only so much use to me. And certainly I use Windows for the vast share of software available for it. But now days I consider myself orphaned.

      I use FreeBSD, I toy with BeOS from time to time, I use Windows (ME and XP), and I'll play with anything I can get my hands on just to tinker with it.

      It's been a long time since I can say I loved an OS. I'm very much a multi-platform guy because no one OS is anywhere close to perfect anymore. Some would say for it's time, AmigaDOS 2.0 was about perfect back then. And others would say OS/2 hit that mark at some point as well. I don't know that I'd say I've ever used a perfect OS and I will certainly say the further along we go the further away from perfect they will all get.

      That includes Windows as well as Linux.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  3. Zarus no longer uses AmigaDE by jockm · · Score: 3, Informative

    While the Zaurus was originally announced to use AmigaDE, the developer version is using QT/Embedded + the Jeode VM

    --

    What do you know I wrote a novel
  4. Re:A bunch of really dumb questions by ColdGrits · · Score: 4, Informative

    No.

    It is related in name only. the current owners bought the name from Gateway 2 or 3 years ago, promised the Earth to existing Amiga users, and then proceeded to do stuff all except rebadge and try to resell TAO's software.

    Oh, and put out lots of announcements of annoncements.

    Oh, and tell us how wonderful it is working with Corel (nothing happened), how the Sharp Zaurus (sp?) was shipping with AmigaDE (it doesn't), and how AmigaInc was helping Matroxto design the new Matrox gfx chips (they aren't).

    Despite their best efforts to kill off AmigaOS, though, third parties are stilldeveloping it thankfully. However, AmigaInc has nothing to do with thateffort (other than getting huge royalties on the name when AmigaOS4 finally gets released, if ever).

    --
    People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
  5. This ain't your old Amiga. ;-( by dammy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Simple answer, no. This DEad is more of a .com business trying to sucker developers in so they can sucker OEMs into contract$.

    If your more into the Amiga OS, I suggest you take a look at Amithlon, AROS, AmigaXL or MorphOS.

    Now if your really into a OS developed by a game porting company (that as the official Amiga badge), your in luck. HyperOS4 should be out this year.

    Dammy, awaiting the Faithful Follower's of The Name Cult to come out flaming me. Who needs Scientologist, we have Amiga Inc!

  6. This isn't bad at all. by tcc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course a lot of you will say "where does it fit, why would I want this" well the fact is it's not a majority of people that owns a PVR or a media station box (new buzzword?) should ring a bell.

    I wanted one of these since I saw the replay/tivo hardware, but 2 things stopped me, first generation so probably there would be firmware issues, better revisions not too far ahead, etc.. and the other was the price for the non-upgradability (well without hacking it :) ) that it offered (and we can also add the price/meg of the HDDs that are getting very interresting the more the time go), and HDTV support, I could go on for days. OF COURSE the positive aspect of being an early adopter is that you already have the technology and can actually do something while the others wish.. but if I would have bought it right off I wouldn't have wanted to spend again on another box. The dream machine of course is some kind of tivo, with ethernet access, dual IDE brackets, divx codec in firmware, transcoder from grabbed->divx realtime, DVD+RW, and for most of you "not running windows" :).

    This machine is a step in the right direction, and yes I am an avid amiga fan, if you think all the amiga people are lame zealots, you probably never owned or programmed or enjoyed that piece of advanced technology way ahead of it's time. That being said, I don't beleive it would do a comeback on the desktop unless it doesn't repeat all of linux's errors or arguable moves, even then, there would be a great need of marketting power and it doesn't mean it would still take off...(just look at where BE is today...) Nevertheless, amiga was famous for video, for one thing, whether it was for video processing, all it's gazillion video output possibilities, colors or advanced features, when you heard amiga you were thinking "multimedia" before that term became a buzzword on a 486PC that had a cdrom.

    I think it's very nice to see amiga striking tangible deals like this and finally see a product, it's not what everybody wanted (i.e. a computer that rights off the bat kills windows mac and linux and is so revolutionnary that it will be the second video toaster), this will probably never happen because of the current infrastructure in companies, and besides, a lot of projects have tried before, and there are already 1000s of people paid just to think of the future and desings, and they aren't all FOC people. The time when one person could really change things in the computer realm is probably over (of course there's always exeptions so I keep an open mind) what you need to target now is "what is going to be the next electronic revolution and how can I bypass all my competitors" Cellular technology is gaining a lot since a few years, so is HDTV or any new video technology... I just hope they do the right moves and not to many errors, I wish them the best.

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  7. The MediaTerminal is cool... by CondeZer0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hi

    michael: FYI the media terminal *was launched by the end of 2001*, I live in Sweden, and they
    have been selling for quite a while now.

    We also had a demo of the new version, that will be launched in 2 weeks or so, in the FOSDEM, at
    the Mozilla developers room, it was really great, it runs Linux(2.4.10+ I think), uses an embedded
    version of mozilla as browser(0.9.5+, and will be upgraded automatically to 1.0 when it's released),
    have 2 USB, 2 FireWire, 1 PCMCIA, Ethernet, and I don't remember what else, but it was really cool...
    (full specs here: http://www.nokia.com/multimedia/tech_specs.html)

    I don't have a TV, so I doubt I'll buy one, but you can be sure that it will take very short
    time to be hacked, also almost all(if not all) the software it runs it's opensource, and you
    can find it at: https://www.ostdev.net/(I think they are
    going to release even more software there in the very near future)

    A really cool project, that uses opensource software... <rant>ah, sorry, I forgot that this
    days slashdot is full of M$ zealots that run WinXP/IE and think that in linux you have to do
    "./configure; make; make install" to install anything(have you heard of RedCarpet? that makes
    me think.... RedCarpet/Ximian desktop for the MediaTerminal? that could be cool...(not for me,
    of course ;) )</rant>

    [End rambling, back on topic ]

    I think it's great that somebody is doing something like this, have in mind that this
    will compete directly with the next version of the X-Box(HomeStation or whatever it's
    going to be called), and I really prefer to see people using a product based on opensource
    (so I can hack it if I want) than having to run windows on their TV(<troll>anyone wants to get
    a BSOD in the middle of his favorite movie ;) </troll>, ah, and one last thing, the person
    from nokia(hi Magnus!) that made the presentation, said that they are going to release xDSL modems
    for it, that means that this modems will have drivers for Linux, something that in the past was a really
    big problem... in resume(I have to go back to work!) this is a "Very good thing(tm)" and
    anybody that cares about open source should be happy that it exists..(even if like me, many
    of us aren't probably going to ever use it, after all, we don't have a life, right? ;)


    \\Uriel


    P.S.: I use FreeBSD with Ion instead of any desktop, but it's really funny
    to see people complaining that linux is hard to use when even a 3 years
    old could install RedHat(in my experience much easier than installing any
    WinXX)

    P.P.S.: Hmmm. I think in the end it could be useful for me: a Plan9 CPU or file server...
    and I could mount the TV screen(if I had one) from my Plan9 termianl ;)

    --
    "When in doubt, use brute force." Ken Thompson
  8. Launch by labil · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Nokia Media Terminal was supposed to be launched in the second quarter of 2001, then by the end of 2001, now... who knows.

    Actually, it's already available in Sweden, and I guess the rest of Europe, though at a price of 8.495 SEK (~ $1000), I can't imagine they sold many of them...

  9. Re:I've been wondering... by BlueGecko · · Score: 3, Informative
    An infinite number of registers? Are you a troll, or just a crackfiend? You know nothing of assembly language, or you would be laughing as hard as I am now. If you emulate a cpu, and you design the virtual cpu in such a way that there are unlimited registers, they are no longer registers, but rather the equivalent of variables and/or pointers.
    Neither troll nor crack, although if you haven't seen the AmigaDE documents I do understand why you think I might be. AmigaDE registers are 32-bit integers only which may be pointers or data. AmigaDE also has variables (data stored that must be fetched by pointer), just like every other assembly language. Without this, you couldn't have strings or complex data structures. It just so happens that it also allows you an infinite number of registers. In common use, I'd say a function uses maybe 12 or so registers on average when written in the Amiga's virtual assembly. On an x86, only 4 to 8 get to be lucky enough to be register variables. The rest will be regular variables, with all the lag associated with them. On a PowerPC, which has 32 integer registers and 32 floating registers (and 32 vector registers on a G4), you could fit them all in registers. On an x86-64 as well, you could fit all of them on there, and on an Itanium, with its 320 registers, you could probably keep all pointers and integers in register space. It's not really any different from declaring a variable "register" in C. The compiler tries to make it a register, and if it can't, it won't. Similarly, as long as a variable happens to be a 32-bit number, you can make it a register in VP, and if you're lucky enough to be on an architecture with lots of registers, it will be one. Further, if you use named registers, when the code is compiled, the assembler aggressively checks scoping to see where a specific register may be reused. When no additional registers are available, and for more complex data, you need pointers anyway, and you've got them.

    Thus, they are not variables; but I suppose that, you are correct, they are not full registers, either. That said, you might want to be slightly less aggressive when you say someone's wrong. I understand why you think I'm nuts, but surely there was a more polite way to point that out.