Slashdot Mirror


It's (Almost) Hammer Time

thelizman writes "C|Net is catching up on the buzz with AMD's Hammer line of processors. Of note in the article is how AMD demonstrated their 64-bit contender using Linux and Windows, instead of just Windows. In reality, Linux will likely have 64 bit applications more quickly than Microsoft, and will see use on this processor more readily than your average WinTel machine, so you know...like...it only makes sense."

6 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. Offtopic Request to CmdrTaco by MicroBerto · · Score: 3, Insightful
    so you know...like...it only makes sense."
    When a user submits a good link, but includes lame garbage like this at the end, do you think you could modify it to look a bit better?

    I'm not sure which is better journalism though... on one end, you're looking more professional by not having stupid 14-year-old-girl talk on the front page. On the other end, you're cutting up someone's quote!

    I'd rather have it look nicer.

    --
    Berto
  2. AMD was right to grab every DEC Alpha engineer by ejoe_mac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    AMD: Takes an existing archetecture and extends it with an excellent talent pool of engineers that speak in 64 bit.

    Intel: Buys its way out of a lawsuit for stealing 64bit microcode from the DEC Alpha, then buy's the Alpha from Compaq to discontinue it. Then create a brand new 64 bit chip using their own limited talent, while shoving the existing 64 bit platfrom into an early grave.

    Does this make sence to anyone? Alpha's rock, and they have been 64 bit for years. There already was versions of Win2k, Linux and Unix in addition to major apps like SAP and Oracle tuned for the platform.

  3. Re:Is x86 really the way to go? by AaronW · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually the Hammer series adds 8 more general purpose registers and more SSE registers. Read up on X86-64, there's more to it than just going 64-bit. For example, there's better support for relocatable code (i.e. shared libraries).

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  4. Re:Windows at disadvantage? by sean23007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You may well be right. In fact, this could be AMD's way to get back at Microsoft. For so long, MS and Intel have been sleeping together, both helping eath other out in each other's industries, forcing the other computer manufacturers to use their products in computers.

    In the transition to 64 bits, if AMD can get there faster (and by there, I mean readily available to the consumer, not readily available to the bored millionaire), they can enlist Linux as their Microsoft and do the same thing to the market that has been happening for a decade: only with a free OS.

    Actually, I wouldn't mind, and I don't think many would.

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  5. Re:Windows at disadvantage? by inburito · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What would you benefit from running a 64bit platform?

    Key applications for 64bit computing are more or less involved with anything that requires a huge amount of memory. Servers(massive databases), high-end engineering(airplanes, ships, etc.) and scientific computing come into my mind.

    In these kind of applications and systems you're not concerned whether or not you like windows xp but rather: how cost effective is it and what is the performance advantage?

    Unless your computers memory capacity is exhausted(what, 4 gigs is not enough for everyone?) and it is crunching numbers on full load 24/7 I don't see too many reasons aside the coolness factor to even consider 64bit computing. Heck, smp systems would make much more sense in most of the cases.

  6. Desktop applications requiring lots of RAM by mbessey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A short list of desktop applications that could reasonably use multi-gigabytes of RAM. These are all arguably "high-end" applications, but that goes with the territory:

    1. Non-linear video & film editing:
    Current video editing software can work from and to disk, but availability of more RAM will make it easier to do more sophisticated effects in real time.

    2. Genome sequence analysis
    Okay, not very many people will be doing this, but it IS a growing field, and people are doing the work on desktiop machines now (albeit slowly).

    3. Modelling / CAD
    You can never have too much memory in a CAD workstation.

    4. Software development
    Again, you can never have too much memory. More memory enables more agressive optimization, as well as supporting more productivity features in the IDE (like full source indexing). I have used toolsets that need 2+ GB of RAM to compile a relatively simple program (they swap now, of course).

    So, probably not for Microsoft Word '03, but there are definitely applications for 64-bit computing out there other than servers.

    -Mark