Slashdot Mirror
Glimpses of the Future from the Intel Developer Forum
km790816 writes: "Lots of cool stuff on CNet about the Intel Developer Forum, including the next version of the P4, followed by 3GIO on the desktop (1st version 0.5 gigabytes per second of data-transfer capacity but bumps up to 1, 2, 4 and 8 gigabytes per second with the use of more wires.), and Intel's work to embed wireless in silicon. Quote from the CTO: 'We could get it to the point where radios are built into every product we make, giving every device seamless, roaming connectivity. You will see orders of magnitude of cost (decreases) through integration into silicon.'"
Troll 80 of 90 from the annals of the Troll Library .
I like AMD.
My favorite Microsoft subpage
Yet another!
Intel predicts that Linux is Dying.
cool stuff... Go intel... you rule ...
It is slightly ironic that this intel technology post-- about the great future they will bring us with everything having wireless connectivity and whatnot-- appears right after another article about SSSCA and how we won't really be able to share much without DRM and a note from our mother.
Will technology really be made to bow down before a Britney Spears CD or a Glitter DVD? The dark ages would then be upon us once again.
The big question, though:
"DDR or RAMBUS or ????"
Seriously... with Intel recently dumping RAMBUS (see slashdot article a few days ago) what would these new P4s use? I would imagine that this "hyper-threading" along with higher-than-ever clock speeds would make the memory bandwidth even more of an issue than it already is.
Will they go back to using RAMBUS?
Will they continue to choke the P4 with DDR?
Or...do they have something totally different in mind without telling us?
-kwishot
Quote from the CTO: 'We could get it to the point where radios are built into every product we make [...]
:)
Radio? Gimme sattelite tv, radio is old news...
Here it is.
It would be really interesting to see how AMD is able to compete with Intel with the 'departure' from the common standard. Of course the new AMD chip ClawHammer, will be able to support current x86 instructions, but it won't really help you much to run it that way.
;-O
Hopefully AMD will really work on a compiler that take advantage of the new chip's strength. Maybe hire those SGI engineers?
I just hope we will still have a choice in the processor market a few years from now.
geek page at KY speaks
The R&D engineers at Intel have an impressive record of coming up with innovative designs, but I think they have been going in the wrong direction lately. For example, take their research into reducing the size of silicon transistors. Right now they are making transistors at something like .07 micron(I think). How much smaller can we go?? Eventually, we'll make a transistor the size of an atom and then there will be no more advances. And that day could come very soon.
What Intel should be doing is reasearching new materials. For example, silicone. The advantages silicone has over silicon are numerous. For example, if Intel made an entire microprocessor out of silicone then they could corner the market on embedded systems in female breasts. Think of the possibilities: You could expand and shrink the size of your girlfriend's breasts!! By remote control!! So when you are getting nasty in bed you can make then watermellon size, but when she leaves the house make sure to shrink them to almost nothing so studly pimps(like myself) don't steal her. And if you break up then make her breasts the size of skyscrapers!! She won't even be able to walk!! There's no way you could do cool stuff like this with lame old silicon. Remember: Silicone is the future!!
... if you think the Hitachi mu-chip + RFID raised privacy concerns (see http://www.usethesource.com/articles/01/09/26/1052 39.shtml), guess what Intel Chip ID + WiFi will do for your filters. It's not going to be just the transparent society but downright naked in having lifestyle choices spammed up places where they shouldn't be. Maybe it's not too late to buy real estate in places where it is just to expensive to have blanket net coverage (Canada? Australia?). Is it my imagination or are chip designers serving a self-selected group (BSA, DRM, etc) rather than the consumer nowadays? Either that or all CxOs are branded with the same mental template.
LL
If the current P4's are shipping with hyperthreading on the chip but not enabled, then how do we flip the bit to turn it on? Or is that something Intel is disabling at the factory on shipping chips?
On another note, with gigs per second of speed, imagine beaming TV shows between televisions and even from your TiVo to your PC... I can already see the lawsuits.
I'm wondering what radio spectrum they are going to use to accomplish this. Its a finite resource. If 3G ever gets going every bit of spectum left except the ISM bands is going to be used up. And I have a hard time imagining that products are going to work in a city where there are 10000 other people sharing the band at the same time. Marketing clashes with reality on this one.
One thing I am waiting for with wireless is some decent security functionality. What with the farce that is 802.11 and the proliferation of 'secure' data within companies I work with, wireless has become one of the major security threats.
The number of people I have found using RF keyboards/mice on computers in 'secure' areas, and not even believing that these can be snooped (which is quite trivial), then insisting that we have a 802.11 hub for their flashy new laptop, simply because it has that functionality built in.
I would love to see a standard developed for a plugable security model on top of these transports, so a 'suitable' level of protection can be installed for the situation.
- It's an ultra-low-power x86 chip line.
- It's due in 2003.
- It's not based on the P-4 core, but is a fresh design, possibly related to the P6 core. (Boy, that's a bad pair of abbreviations, but you know what I mean.)
- It probably has a completely redesigned instruction decoder; I found some mention of combining instructions into common bundles.
- It's capable of turning off unused portions of the chip to save power.
- It's intended for laptops and blades (of course).
- It's being designed in Israel.
That's a slim set of factoids; anyone have any more? Or any corrections?Although I recognize that the general noder population is far more literary than the general population at large, I find quite often that even the most literary among us run into trouble with the bard. Here's a new (read: Better) way of looking at it, in a few painless steps:
Shakespeare is like sex.Why? you ask. Sure he was bawdy and lewd, but most of his subtle penis jokes go straight over our heads in these days of T&A. *ahem* "Why, then is my pump well-flower'd," and "Give us the swords, we {women} have bucklers of our own," among others. Use your imagination for those. Get your mind into the gutter.
Shakespeare is like Sex, however for the following reasons:
The first time you do it, you're fumbling all over the place, unsure of what goes where or how. Hell, maybe it even hurts a little. There are all these crazy sweaty pieces that are supposed to fit comfy together and make some happy sort of thing. We all know that is not exactly what happens. "Ow! Ouph... Ah, yes right there- OW! wait, maybe, no, now you, um, Okokok, like that?" *wiggle* That's all very well and good - for the first time. It takes a little practice to really be able to milk (so to speak) this stuff for all it's are worth. We're allowed to fumble a little bit. The first time.
But just think of how some people can never quite get the "good sex" thing down. (After all, beyond age... ok, "beyond virginity", if you will, the fumbling is just not pretty. Bad sex is... Bad. But that's for another node.) Sometimes, even the best of us cannot quite get the "good Shakespeare" thing down either: Dost thou kickest me cur thou ruffian? I spit in thee general direction!
How bout.... NO! Stop. If ya can't do it right, please, don't do it at all. Eugenics anyone? But don't despair either, I won't cut off your balls just yet, because anyone with a mind to CAN learn to do it right. There are schools (respectable ones!) that offer courses in tantric sex. I propose to you: Tantric Shakespeare.
In these modern days, we tend to approach Will Shakes in a Discovery channel Special: "Mating Behaviors Through the Ages" type way. Get over yourselves! Turn on the Playboy channel! Seriously, you'll learn more. Most places, Shakespeare is studied as literature, like Jane Erye or Great Expectations. BORING. Shakespeare is in the THEATRE, not the libraries. Theatre is alive, it's people, it's personal; it's nitty gritty not sleeping on the wet spot up against the wall limbs flailing shouting and moaning orgasmic fun. Literature can get kinky too, sure, but the study of it is seems to tend towards the missionary postion. This world hangs tight to some pretty strange Puritan-type morals. We don't like to let go with our horny, animalistic desires. It's too scary for us, too dirty! What if someone gets hurt? What if... we like it? We mustn't let that happen! Our mommies wouldn't approve, right?
Problem is, Shakespeare is meant to be performed, it is not meant to be read, not even to be read "as a play." We've all been told this a million times, and yet we continue to disregard it. He wrote the plays for the actors. Many parts in the script are written just for the actors. You may notice, that before nearly every entrance in every play, a character already on stage says: "Lo! Here comes so-and-so!" followed by a few more lines, and then the actual entrance of aformentioned so-and-so. This statement told so-and-so, waiting backstage, that it was time for them to get onstage, and then gave them the time to actaully do it. (See: Role for more on that) The audience doesn't care that King whats-his-face is coming. They'll see him when he gets there. But the actors needed to know when to make their entrances, and Shakespeare was nice enough to tell them.
The half of the play that was not written for the actors was written for the audience. Now, obvioulsy, every play is "written for the audience." But Shakespeare was a master manipulator. He knew his audience like nobody else. He knew how he wanted them to feel, and he knew how to make them feel it. He gave them what they wanted to see. And he used them like his... "bitches." It's a great S&M love triangle. And most librarians/English professors are not "down for whatever." Shakespeare doesn't want to be analyzed. He wrote the plays for the actors so that they could give it to the audience. He wants you to be there, breathing in sync with him, butterfly position, and making eye contact. What he dishes out is supposed to be fun for us all. This is no Wham-Bam-Thank You Ma'am. Shakespeare wrote nine minute screaming orgasms. Multiple Ejaculations! When you hit the Shakespearean G-Spot, you just know, cause it feels sooo good.
You wanna fuck Shakespeare like a porn star? Approach the play as if you were the actor. Imagine that you're trying to become these characters, and portray them to an audience clearly. Shakespeare didn't care so much about leaving some great literary mark. He didn't even own the plays, technically, after he wrote them. They belonged to the theatre and the company. All he wanted was to make money. In order to do that, he had to write something that people would want to see. He also had specific actors, the "principals" whom he had to write certain types of characters for. When he invented new words, it wasn't necessarily because he was having deep thoughts on the nature of the English language; it was because he needed something to rhyme so that he could have a nice end scence. Nearly every scene ended in a rhyming couplet. The audience expected this, and so when they heard one, they figured it was time for something new to start. Some scenes keep going after one character has made his rhyming statement. This signals to the audience that another character is being particualrly wordy, or that perhaps something odd is underfoot, and they need to pay closer attention. The character of Puck, for one, in A Midsummer Night's Dream, does almost nothing BUT rhyme. He's a faerie. That's weird in and of itself. But to distinguish him as the bad ass faerie that he is, Shakespeare gave him some mad jive talkin skills.
"When in that moment, - so it came to pass, -
Titania waked, and straightway loved an ass."
SO: Next time you bust out your First Folio, do it naked, armed with a cat-o-nine and covered in metaphorical whipped cream, cause that's the way Will wants it. Oh Baby!
...but when can we turn the damn pc on INSTANTLY? like a calculator or a palm!
I think that it will be hard to get devices without this universal locatability soon.
while this is good for people who want to get their sports scores at 3 am while careening down the highway, it's not good for people who wish to place a private call without some agency knowing what house they are placing it from.
Your extramarital affair, your whistle-blowing telephone call, your obfuscation of whereaboutsa from your parents, etc. could all be negatively impacted by the predominance of radio-implanted devices. That's fine, just allow the option of devices that still allow privacy.
Goat sex free since 2001
The ham radio bands are some prime spectrum
real estate, and ham radio is essentially dead anyway -- or it will be in 10 years or so, since
the average ham is a 75-80 year old WWII vet.
Today's Cock Lengthening Troll brought to you by Senior Troll and theletter G (it's a G thang) Special props to these trolls Keep up the goodwork my homies! Genghis Trollreal_b0fh CmderTacoThe BOFH Troll RoboTrollMayor McPenisman The_Fire_HorseCarp Flounderson
aria-giovanni.tv_0359.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0360.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0361.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0362.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0363.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0364.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0365.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0366.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0367.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0368.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0369.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0370.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0371.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0372.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0373.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0374.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0375.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0376.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0377.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0378.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0379.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0380.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0381.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0382.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0383.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0384.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0385.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0386.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0387.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0388.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0389.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0390.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0391.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0392.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0393.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0394.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0395.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0396.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0397.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0398.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0399.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0400.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0401.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0402.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0403.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0404.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0405.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0406.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0407.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0408.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0409.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0410.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0411.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0412.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0413.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0414.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0415.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0416.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0417.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0418.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0419.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0420.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0421.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0422.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0423.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0424.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0425.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0426.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0427.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0428.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0429.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0430.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0431.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0432.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0433.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0434.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0435.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0436.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0437.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0438.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0439.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0440.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0441.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0442.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0443.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0444.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0445.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0446.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0447.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0448.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0449.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0450.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0451.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0452.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0453.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0454.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0455.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0456.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0457.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0458.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0459.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0460.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0461.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0462.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0463.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0464.jpg
Apropos yesterday's thread on "the price of doing business" http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/01/181520 0&mode=thread&tid=98, the mentioned CNET link http://news.com.com/2100-1001-848115.html that goes into how Intel wants to embed wireless communications capabilities in silicon gives another clue as to how "the price of doing business" will lead to more hiring offshore. Here's a quote from the CNET story:
"Increasingly, an incremental amount of the company's research projects will migrate overseas. The company's research grants "are too heavily biased in the U.S. today," Gelsinger said during the interview. "The U.S. graduates about 50 percent of what U.S. industry needs."
Foreign engineers also need jobs. When the company opened offices in Nizhny-Novgorod, Russia, it received approximately 100 applications for every position. "We hired strongly qualified applicants with Ph.D.s for about one-fifth" the cost of their U.S. counterparts, Gelsinger said."
This excerpt represents a forward-looking larger trend that will impact technology workers in the US far more than most currently believe.
I'm not writing to elicit xenophobia, but to encourage technology workers to think about how this trend - which is unstoppable, and in some ways desireable - will change the landscape of technology innovation, and it's implementation on the domestic front.
A wireless mouse is a good example. Sure it could encrypt its communication with my computer, but how are the keys exchanged? How do I know that my mouse is only talking to my computer? Will this problem be multiplied by 100 when every device has some kind of radio in it?
So far only server/workstation chipsets support dual DDR channels, but VIA has plans to push this down to the desktop.
In the UK it means only one thing, and that is John Prescott the deputy prime minister (roughly the equivalent of Dick Cheyney). By the admitidly low standard of politicians he is quite a character. He single handedly made the last general election interesting by punching a voter who was stupid enough to throw an egg at him (when choosing your egg target, don't choose one who used to earn spare cash by bare knuckle boxing!).
I can't decide if the phrase "Prescott PC" would be good for sales or not. I guess it might suggest a machine with a bit of punch!
Why was the above moderated up? This is the fourth time in the past two weeks I've noticed a moderator (or is it moderators) do that! /. needs to let anyone vote on mod points so that a few abusive moderators don't cause all of us to see posts like that.
And RDRAM is good for bandwidth and it clocks well but it has a more latent read time then SDRAM. Intel is moving to a quad pumped 133 FSB (533 MHz) and I don't think they have will be pushing RDRAM in the near future. AMD however does own a RAMBUS licence and may use it for it's Hammer. Rambus is now working on a dual channel 4.2GB "RIMM 4200" module and I don't know what the current max throughput is for the current DDR 333. AMD's 266 FSB will not currently take full advantage of DDR 333 but the addional bandwidth can be used be devices with DMA (direct memory access) as well, the downside is that there is some performance loss having the ram run out of sync with the CPU. AMD hs the capibility to up the FSB but is holding off for marketing reasons.
There are some fragmented thoughts, anyone have a link to a well written article detailing the current state of the technology?
Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
Well I found the background for the codename 'Banias' which ties into the mention that it's being developed in Israel. But I couldn't find a damn thing about the codename 'Prescott'. Anyone? Could it be really referring to the British deputy prime minister?
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2085308,00. html ...
Banias, formerly Caesarea Philippi, is the Arabic name for the Hellenistic city of Paneas whose name derives from Pan, the Greek god of herds and shepherds. His cult was observed in a large cave at the foot of Mount Hermon, where a source of the River Jordan emerges.
Pepperdine University has conducted digs in the area that have unearthed parts of a palace from Herod Agrippa II. Modern-day Banias is located in Israel, where the Intel design team for the new chip is based. The company typically codenames its chips after geographical features.
What you wintel guys dont see coming is that
AMD will not be the real competitor to P4 and
Itanium.
Once the Motorola G5 hits the street (a few months
at most), the performance crown will solidly be
back on the Mac side...for good. There's no way a
CISC or hybrid can compete with a full, true RISC processor at comparable MHz. All the important
benchmarks show that the initial 1.6Ghz G5 will run rings around a 3GHz Pee4.
Add to that the high quality Apple motherboard
and chipset design, coupled with MacOS X, will
extend it's advantages even farther.
The CNet article mentioned the next version of P4 architecture. However it says nothing about progression of clock speed on the current P4. Does anybody have any information about it. Some sort of release schedule (2.4GHz in ...? 2.6GHz in ..., etc. and so on).
A religious war is an adult version of a fight over who has the best imaginary friend
How much simpler can installation get? You take out the plate, lightly shove the card into the slot and screw it in, then reboot windoze. /hour fee to install said pci card.
OTOH, there are plenty of users in this world who pay the teenager down the street $20 to install a new NIC or modem. Or, even worse, pay the local FutureShop (insert US equiv. here) $40 + a $50
One innovation I would like to see would be a total overhaul of the concept of installing a driver (mainly for Windows, although *nix would be nice too).
Basically, I envision a ROM chip on every card, containing a copy of the device driver. User A puts card B in slot C, boots Windows, driver D is auto installed from the chip without the user clicking a button.
This would be especially useful for those situations where Windows PnP loads the wrong driver for the device, or asks the user for a file located 7 directories deep on a floppy.
Of course, both of the above are of little to no use for the average /. user, but could be a godsend for Joe Newbie.
My other sig is funny!
Sigh, another wide post moderated upwards.
I'm sure it can be as secure as it needs to be with another layer of security like a VPN, but as it stands today how secure is bluetooth. Could my laptop start using any printer in range, or sniff anything in the air ect? Could I listen in on the conversation of someone using a bluetooth headset on their mobile phone? If the devices work out of the box, it seems logical...
Okay, the title's a joke. although it did make no provision for DRM. Anyway, the one part that bugs me is the wireless networking. I don't care how good the think it is, it still seems like a Security hole? cavity? cavern? Every hear of war-driving?
Leave the gun, take the cannoli -- Clemenza, The Godfather
slashdot die
Man, do you have your priorities mixed up. Driving faster than the speed limit can only kill people. Without DRM, though, the big record labels / movie studios could lose money!
Cheers
-b
What about Intel's previous entry into the novelty denture market? One can hardly forget the "WHO LET THE DOGS OUT" canine dentures for 'ol Rover. For a few weeks after that, you couldn't walk into a Walgreen's without seeing miles of displays of that. Why not?
Life is a scam. - Steve McQue
Perhaps if Eastern Germany decides to adopt Linux, they will insist on using DDR memory ;-)
--
The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.
I find it amusing that The 3GIO article didn't bother to mention the other competing serial protocols like Infiniband. A few years ago, when Intel's NGIO (yes, to predicessor to 3GIO) and FutureIO merged to become (eventually) Infiniband, the industry all hopped on board, expecting it to becomed the Next Big Thing. But int the last year or so Infiniband has turned into the ugly stepsister. The industry lost intrest in it when Intel quit and started their own protocol (because they couldn't control the spec enough).
Our company was no different. We were pushing to make Infiniband products just like everyone else, but when we finally had time to start working on one, the party had ended and everyone had gone home. Well, it looks like we should be gearing up for 3GIO soon...
the Apple chips are *NOT* RISC. Reduced Instruction Set Computing means that you have a processor with vary few instructions,
That's not what RISC is about. More precisely the acronym would have been Reduced Complexity Instruction Set. But that is hard to pronounce. Number does not necessarily equal complexity. Even better would have been to leave "Instruction Set" out. RISC is limited to the instruction set but a design philosophy.
The following should clear up the confusion better than I.
Dennis O'Connor in comp.arch
more support for Mashey's def
Mashey on RISC CISC passage
Thread containing Mashey's long post