Phil Long and Open Courseware
WebWord Usability writes: "The Technology Source is running an interview with Phil Long. It is mainly about open source software and open courseware development at MIT (e.g., Open Knowledge Initiative). If you're interested in this stuff, CREN will be streaming a discussion with Vijay Kumar and Phil Long on Thursday 7-March-2002 at 4PM EST. Still want to know more? Syllabus Magazine ran an article on OpenCourseWare in January 2002."
MIT already has a course materials on the WWW page where they have links to the web-pages created by professors for their classes. And, a lot of them aren't just a class syllabus and problems numbers from the book, but exams, solutions, HW solutions and sometimes even class notes. It's neat browsing through those.
I guess this is just an extension of the idea so that all web-interface is the same for all classes. I just hope it doesn't end like other university web-site where 90% of the web-pages generated for classes are 90% the same and just contains the syllabus. Very frustrating browsing through 100 class links and they're all the same.
Last time it was Unix-based, developed X Windows for an interface, and was offered out for license by other institutions.
This time it's some interpretation of the idea "Open" (MIT-style which is usually pretty good) and now with infrastructure widely available they're concentrating just on syllabi & courseware.
Nice how they've delineated what MIT-as-an-educational-experience-offers and how that's different from using their materials; that giving the latter away doesn't devalue the former.
I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
I teach a final year Software Systems development course for one of the largest universities in the world, and the majority of the courseware we use is available online. The university is The Open University, the course is M301: Software Systems and their Development.
The course includes a number of aspects of development, including ethics (links from the main student website to other ethical institutions), project management, java, UML, and concurrency. Most of the materials are on that site, except of course for the two set books - a java book and a concurrency book.
The open philosophy of the Open University predates that of MIT, although has a lot in common with academia in general - that of a meritocracy where knowledge is shared, and the importance is placed on what you do with it and how you do it, rather than where you come from or what you look like.
I find the MIT angle to be very interesting, because they say they are not giving the "experience" or "education" away. This is true, and probably the only thing the OU lacks is regular face to face tuition. Having said that, I gave a tutorial just yesterday, and met my students for the first time this year, and we are in regular communication via email and webchat, so we are not losing that much!
I am very interested in seeing how MIT perform in terms of materials - because we in the OU don't have a large face-to-face component, the materials have to read very well, and I feel they do (check it out).
jer
We may be human, but we're still animals
- Steve Vai
Knowledge alone isn't a terribly useful commodity- it takes hard work and a certain degree of talent to turn knowledge into a set of useful skills and the ability to think critically.
The "knowledge" that MIT is making publicly available has always been available to those taking the time to acquire it- all MIT is now doing it showing how certain professors package this information up to present to their students.
When you go to a prestigious university, you are not paying for the trade secrets of how the world operates- you are paying for the opportunity to interact with and learn from professors who are at the cutting edge of their fields- the feedback and encouragement that these people can provide to a motivated student simply cannot be bound up in a book or presented on the web.
By now I have spent an unusually long period stuggling to complete an undergraduate degree at MIT. Do I still feel that the experince is worth it now that they will be giving away all this information that I have struggled so hard to acquire? Absolutely. All my neatly bound course notes wouldn't be worth anything had I not gone through the process of actually learning the material. For me, that process could only have occurred in an academic environment.
Ever want to take the infamous 15-412 Operating Systems class at CMU? Type 15-412 into google and you can get the homepage:
c ts /proj3/
http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~412/index.html
full of lectures, notes, homework, exams and projects.
How many of you have ever written your own shell from scratch? Maybe now's your chance. Or better yet, read up the kernel project:
http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~412/applications/proje
Here is a direct link to The MIT Open Courseware Program
http://www.kubuntu.org/