Slashdot Mirror
Centuries-Old Longitude Clock Runs Again
douglips writes "BBC News has published a story about John Harrison's H4 chronometer and how it has been wound up for the UK's National Science Week.
After 40 years of work [Harrison] proved in 1764 that a clock could be used to locate a ship's position at sea with extraordinary accuracy." Ah, the GPS system of its day. T. adds: This is the timekeeping device which Dava Sobel wrote about in Longitude .
Pretty interesting concept for its time. Pretty easy to think of if you could see the big picture. But back then, they couldn't. Gotta hand it to Harrison. Good idea.
Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
The interesting thing about the Harrison clocks, is not only were they the GPS of their day, they were also the atomic clocks of their day.
The Harrison clocks, created in the 1700's, are still more accurate than your average digital watch today.
Longitude the movie was pretty cool, and has been airing on A&E a lot recently late at night...
And you get to see a prop version of the H1 running -- some cool mechanical engineering; even though the first 3 didn't really work on the open sea.
Longitude
James Burke mentions this in the Connections tv series. A lot of people tried and failed to make a clock accurate at sea.
I wish I could get that series on DVD.
-fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
I was in London last November, and visited the Royal Observatory in Greenwich. I was familiar with the Harrison clocks and story, but I hadn't known they were kept there. So it was a pleasant surprise to find them there. If you're a geek and you happen to be in London, it's well worth your time to go take a look.
The first three clocks are these large (roughtly 1.5 ft in each dimension) contraptions with lots of visible moving parts, wooden gears, etc. Then you get to H4, and it's this elegant little package. The leap between the first three clocks and the fourth is enormous.
There's a fair amount of other neat stuff at Greenwich, too. They have a number of displays about the development of "time infrastructure". I remember reading one bit that talked about how, in 1852 (I believe), Greenwich began transmitting the time to the rest of England via telegraph. I couldn't help but be reminded of how clock signals are distributed around a CPU and other synchronous logic devices, and think that maybe humanity is somewhat more borg-like than we usually acknowledge.
Clocks in heavier gravitational fields tick at a slower rate.
Clocks in faster relative motion tick slower.
So:
A clock at the equator ticks slower than a clock at the north pole, because the relative velocity of objects at the equator is higher than those at the poles (the axis of spin) due to earth's rotation, but,
The equator clock will tick faster because it's located farther from the earth's center of mass (due to earth's spin, it bulges a bit in the middle) resulting in slightly lower gravity- and the effects don't always cancel each other out.
So then,
Relativity predicts that atomic clocks onboard GPS satellites will tick faster by about 50 microseconds per day (compared to ground-based clocks), due to the weaker gravitational field in orbit, but,
They also will tick slower by about 7.2 microseconds per day, due to the satellites' orbital velocity.
GPS's designers compensate for this by changing base time rate for the clocks onboard satellite.
Fun facts:
The cesium atomic clocks onboard GPS satellites are accurate to about one nanosecond, and light travels about one foot in one nanosecond. Hence, the best accuracy of GPS is about one foot.
GPS satellites have been used to experimentally verify that light moves at constant speed at all times/locations visited by earth.
And there are other confirmed predictions as well. One other I've heard is that GPS's radio signals experience frequency shift due to earth's gravitational field (photons want top accelerate but can't surpass C, so the acceleration energy increases their frequency) and this had to be compensated for as well.
Time be time.
Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma
I've tuned my digital to accuracy within 10 seconds a year, but this is at room-temperature. The quartz crystals used in modern watches (be it digital or analogue) are quite sensitive to heat and a few degrees can alter accuracy plus or minus several seconds a month. (I'm a watchmaker by trade, so we have the equipment to do this, and I'm using a digital because I require the convenience of some of its additional functions over my Omega automatic)
Many (most in fact) modern quartz watches by default are not overly accurate, even expensive ones often can be out by as much as 2 minutes a month. If you're lucky they have a trimpot on the circuit - most don't.
It took over 45 years to develop a watch that kept time accurately at see. And loosing over a second a day of accuracy was considered accurate!
It is amazing to think about the rate at which technology is improving. The changes we see in our life time are clear evidence of an acceleration in the rate at which technology is advancing. It was only since about the time of Jules Verne that technology has begun to change rapidly enough that humans recognize its effect on society. It was this recognition that was necessary to give birth to speculation about the effect of technology on the future, otherwise know as science fiction.
[news for me, stuff that doesn't matter]
Mechanical clocks and watches are still hand manufactured by a company in sweeden after 200 years. They are accurate up to 1/10 of a second per week and the spring mechanisms have gotten so advanced that they go for a month without rewinding them. This may not sound so impressive in a large clock, but consider that this is all done in a watch! The only downside is due to the lack of trained watchmakers and the fact that these are all handmade, each watch can run you several thousand dollars! But think of all the money you'd save on batteries.
William F. Libby (american) invented the atomic clock in 1948 and got nobel prize eventually in 1960.
Britain should review why USA took tech lead 1800s and 1900s instead of endlessly glorifying this achievement.
Of the top 100 most vital inventions from 1850 to 1950 only one was a British and 99 were american inventions.
The one Brirish contribution was the Jet Engine, but they had to "give it away for free" to usa military as part of war debt so essentially it is american in a roundabout way.
Britain spends all its BBC documentary dollars reliving its conquest and Imperial domination empire years again and again.
Oh how british: a perfect clock to win a prize that Britain was unwilling to honor as the prize winner...
They should instead study how Americans patented and created the top 99 technological marvels of the years between 1850 and 1950 and quit being maudlin and nostalgic about the British Empire years.
They are a dying irrelevant kingdom of socialist welfare programs.
Oh thats right everything hostile on slashdot is automatically a troll eh? Well then do not COMMENT, do not REPLY but not because this is a troll (its not) but because by requesting you not to reply i prove logically and 'de facto' that this is NOT a TROLL. The definition of a troll is that a troller wants a reply or two. I want no replies I said my piece. Go write your own opinions elsewhere and wuit using your British Mod points to stiffle and censor american Free Speech.
There is a beautiful picture of H5 in "The Story of Longitude". If I owned a scanner, I'd post it. It is much like H4, but far less ornate.
IIRC from reading Longitude, some of Harrison's earlier models (perhaps as early as H1 or H2) actually performed more than adequately during sea trials. As for certifying the results of the sea trials of Harrison's clocks (and giving Harrison a rather hefty prize), the Board of Longitude never actually did this due to alot of political Chicanery (there were astronomers on the board who favored a Rube Goldberg method of measuring the moons of Jupiter (Saturn?))
A bit of trivia, I was watching My Fair Lady recently and if you remember the foreign accented professional rival of Higgins at the Diplomatic Ball is revealed to be the affected son of a provincial watchmaker who becomes rich. I assumed this was an allusion to the Harrison episode (he eventually did get a huge prize awarded by the King).
It is by coff... er, will, alone I set my mind in motion...
Lol... funny you should say that :-
:-
:-
According to the US Navy
"In 1958 the Naval Observatory and Britain's National Physical Laboratory published the results of joint experiments that defined the relation between Atomic time and Ephemeris time. (An interesting scientific and philosophical question is whether the relationship between Atomic time and gravitational time remains constant.) Since 1967 the international definition of the second has been based on these joint experiments. Atomic time is kept synchronized with universal time by the addition or subtraction of a leap second whenever necessary."
According to the NPL
"It was Louis Essen's research into the physics of frequency generation and measurement that changed the way the world measures time. In the 1930s he worked on the first quartz oscillator-based clocks and by the 1950's he had devised a caesium atomic-beam tube which could be used as a clock. This led to a better definition of the second using the world's first atomic clock, built at NPL in 1955."
And the Canadians
"A method to replace astronomical observations was urgently sought. The atomic clock, first developed in Britain, was the solution. Scientists at the NRC made a Cesium atomic clock (Cs I) (660528), which went into operation in 1958."
Erm... you don't know your history, anybody worth their scientific salt is aware of Louis Essen :-
"Essen is the only British physicist ever to have been honoured for his contribution to science by both the USA and USSR during the Cold War.
He received the Rabi Award from America and the Popov Medal from the former Soviet Union."
Now... William F. Libby was a brilliant Chemist in his own right, but he didn't invented the Atomic Clock, he created C14 dating (carton dating), he recieved the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1960, according to the Nobel Institute.
So ironically you've gone on to prove the very opposite of your insults and suppositions, the Atomic Clock was actually invented in Britain and you quote a Chemist that actually invented something quite different (though still valid).
Get your facts right unless you want to make an idiot of yourself.