Knuth: All Questions Answered
sunhou writes: "The AMS published a lecture by Donald Knuth called All Questions Answered (pdf), where Knuth simply responded to questions from the audience. Topics ranged from errors in software ('I think Microsoft should say, "You'll get a check from Bill Gates every time you find an error"') to how he gets distracted by fonts on restaurant menus, to software patents. There were some really good questions (and responses)."
I hope it comes back up. As I'm involved in mathematics, I have been using TeX a lot, and (after trying LaTeX) have basically started to use it for everything that comes up. It's a really nice system (WYSIWYM - What You See is What You Mean) and has finally allowed me to be free of MS (Multiple Sclerosis?) Office. I highly suggest it since (after a bit of learning) you can put together really professional looking documents and automagically raise your marks, with much less effort. It even works on the command-line for people like me whose favourite internet program is telnet (for mail, http, irc...).
And now it looks like the pdf file is finally loaded, so I might actually be able to make an intelligent comment soon!
Some primal termite knocked on wood
And tasted it, and found it good,
And that is why your Cousin May
Fell through the parlor floor today.
-- Ogden Nash
Oh man. That's funny. You either have a fantastic sense of humor or a terrible hatred for the world. :)
It's been a long time.
I agree with the rest of your post. I'm agnostic, myself. But saying that you should believe in God just to be on the safe side, because you'll go to hell if He exists, is a logical fallacy. It's actually quite famous, and has a name, Pascal's Gambit. There are several problems with it, but the core problem is that you are reducing an infinite number of possibilities to an artificial either-or situation. It's not a simple choice between believing in a Christian God or believing in nothing at all: any number of deities could exist.
For example, if the Islamists are right, then Allah might be even angrier at me for believing in a Christian God than believing in nothing at all. Or, to be perverse, how about a deity with a sense of humor that sends atheists to heaven and religious people to hell? From the atheist's point of view, he has no evidence either way, and so, to him, this ironic deity has the same chance of existing as the Christian God. Therefore, it is not in his interest to change his beliefs: he has the same probability of going to hell either way. He may as well stick to what his reason tells him is true. Thus, Pascal's Gambit is a fundamentally unconvincing argument.
Are you OK?
:-) :-)
If you have an IRC client, you can always go online and
chat with people. Assuming you are not able to meet anyone
in real life.
Slashdot is not the best place to make friends. The moderation
system is too harsh on offtopic posts, and will silence you,
without any disregard to the human element.
I really sugest you don't follow this posts very seriously. They
are not personal in anyway, and no one knows any other.
As far as SNL is concerned, a great show
I usually watch the reruns during my lunch break. I also like
Kids in the Hall
Take care.