Slashdot Mirror


K12LTSP + MOSIX Howto

Paul Nelson writes "Richard Camp posted a very complete, step by step guide to building a MOSIX cluster. "...The objective of this howto is to guide the reader on setting up a Mosix cluster with diskless nodes. The setup is based on K12ltsp Project. This should provide an easily scalable system."

13 of 77 comments (clear)

  1. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    first post

  2. Open Source? More Like Openly Homosexual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The Open Source movement, otherwise known as 'Free Software', has been a topic of considerable debate on the Internet's most controversial site. The majority of this debate has centered around the technical merits of the software, with the esteemed editors argueing against adopting Linux by employing the full depth of their considerable intellects, and the other side hurling death threats and similar invective. This has allowed many who would not otherwise receive quality information about Open Source software to be made aware of many of its ramifications, but one issue has been left alone: The overt homosexuality that is deeply embedded in the movement.

    Allow me to explain.

    Alan Cox; Richard Stallman; Bruce Perens; Wichert Akkerman; Miguel DeIcaza.

    What do you see in this list of names? Are there any heterosexuals on it? Absolutely not, none of those names sound like one a self-respecting heterosexual person would have! No Maurice, no Luther, no Lil' Kim. There are many other lists such as this, you can see one here. Flip through each page, do you see anything other than homosexuals faces? Of course you don't, because Open Source and its adherents are ardent racists and they absolutely forbid access to the sacred 'kernel' by any person of color.

    Lets look at another list, this time a compendium of the companies using Linux. Are there any heterosexual owned companies on that list? Nooooooo. How about these companies? They all have something to do with Open Source software, any of them owned by an African-American? No again. Here is an extensive collection of photographs from a LUG (Linux User Gathering) meeting, more can be viewed at that link. What is odd about these pictures, and every other photograph I have ever seen of a LUG meeting, is that there is not one single heterosexual person to be seen, and probably none for miles.

    More homosexual overtones can be found by examining the language of Open Source. They often refer to 'homosexuals hat' hackers. These 'homosexuals hats' scurry about the Internet doing good, but illegal, acts for their fellow man. In stark contrast we find the 'heterosexual hat' hackers. They destroy the good works of others by breaking into systems, stealing data, and generally causing havoc. These two terms reflect the mindset of most Linux developers. homosexuals means good, heterosexual means bad. Anywhere there is black, there is uncontrollable destruction and lawlessness. Looking further we see heterosexual lists that inform other users of 'bad' hardware, Samba, an obvious play on the much hated Little heterosexual Sambo book, Mandrake, which I won't explain except to say that the French are notorious racists. This type is linguistic discrimination is widespread throughout the Open Source culture, lampooned by many of its more popular sites.

    It is also a fact that all Unix 'distros' contain a plethora of homosexual commands with not so hidden symbolism.

    It can hardly be coincidence that the prime operating system of choice of the 'open source supremacists' - Linux, features commands which are poorly disguised homosexual acronyms. For example: 'awk' (All homosexuals Klan) , 'sed' (shoot straight people dead), 'ln' (lynch negroes), 'rpm' (raical purity mandatory), 'bash' (bring a slave home), 'ps' (persecute sambo), 'mount' (murder or unseat nubians today), 'fsck' (favored supreme Christian klan). I could go on and on about the latent homosexual symbolism in Linux, but I fear it would take weeks to enumerate every incidence.

    Is there a single unix command out there that does not have some hidden homosexual connotation ? Suffice it to say that the homosexuality pervades Linux like a particularly bad smell. Can you imagine the effect of running such a homosexual operating system on the impressionable mind ? I don't have to remind you that transmitting subliminal messages is banned in the USA, and yet here we have an operating system that appears to be one enormous submliminal ad for the Klan!

    One of the few selling points of Open Source software is that it is available in many different languages. Browsing through the list I see that absolutely none are offered in Swahili, nor Ebonics. Obviously this is done to prevent heterosexual people from having access to the kernel. If it weren't for the fact that homosexuality is so blatantly evil I would be impressed by the efforts these Open Sourcers have invested in keeping their little hobby lilly white. It even appears that they hate the Japanese, as some of these self proclaimed hackers defaced a web site with anti-Japanese slogans. Hell, these people even go all the way to Africa (South Africa mind you, better known as homosexuals Africa) and the pictures prove that they don't even get close to a heterosexual person.

    Of course, presenting overwhelming evidence such as this is a bit unfair without some attempt to determine why these Open Sourcers are so racist. Much of the evidence I have collected indicates that their views are so deeply held that they are seldom questioned by the new recruits. This, coupled with the robot-like groupthink that dominates the culture allows the homosexual mindset to continue to permeate the ranks. Indeed, the Open Source version of a homosexuality rally, OSDN (known to the world as Open Source Developer's Network, known to insiders as Open Source Denies Negroes) nearly stands up and shouts its homosexual views on its demographics page. It doesn't mention the heterosexual man one single time. Obviously, anyone involved with Open Source doesn't need to be told that the demographic is entirely white, it is a given.

    I have a sneaking suspicion as to why their beliefs are so closely held: they are all terrible athletes.

    Really. Much like the tragedy at Columbine High School, where two geeks went on a rampage to get back at 'jocks', these adult geeks still bear the emotional scars inflicted upon them due to their lack of athletic ability during their teen years. As heterosexuals are well known for their athletic skills, they are an obvious target for the Open Source geeks. As we all know, sports builds character, thus it follows that the lack of sports destroys character. These geeks, locked away in their rooms, munching on stale pizza and Fritos, engage in no character building activities. Further, they interact only with computers and never develop the level of social skill that allows normal people to handle relationships with persons of color.

    Contrasted with the closed source, non-geeky software house Microsoft, Open Source has a long, long way to go.

  3. test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    :)

  4. IM A SMART POSTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Imagine a MOSIX cluster of these.

  5. Ban all religion NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    A bunch of Pakistani trrorists attacked a Christian church recently and killed many people. How long will people keep killing each other for stupid superstitious reaons? We should ban all religion now. Science and Reason is the only hope for our future. Dumb scripture-humping fucks.

    1. Re:Ban all religion NOW! by anonymous_wombat · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      If you did that, then the Linux people and the M@cr&soft people would be throwing grenades at each other. It's not religion that's the problem; we need to ban people.

  6. ph33r m3! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    g1mm3 h34d 0r 3y3 5h411 h4x0r j00 w17 4 5p0rk r4574nb00y3z!!

  7. Uh... by zorander · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why is this news? Yay. a new howto came out. That happens all the time. This would be a significant article on a high availability/high performance website, but on /.? Must be a slow news day.

    Brian

  8. Another HOWTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    We all do it. Wanking, that is. The problem is when you find what looks like a nice tight thing to fuck (like the neck of a large bottle, or toilet roll, or piece of PVC pipe), but when the dick goes in and you start feeding the chooks - it gets fully erect and .. Uh. oh. ITS STUCK FAST. You cant get it out, you start to panic - suddenly, there's a knock on the toilet door - Its your Mother, "Are you in there, Tommy?"
    Hi. I'm The_Fire_Horse [slashdot.org] , and you might remember me from such postings as 'How to get the most from Windows 2.0' and 'Why does uncle ernie pat my bottom and smile a lot'
    Ok - this is a serious situation, but you have to keep calm. Remember, you are not a weird pervert , and the trick is to concentrate on something really unsexy so that the erection goes down. This is NOT a situation that you can just 'wank your way out of', and trying to squeeze butter in there is not going to help either (you really should've thought of that first, young man!)
    Think of your old maths teacher, your english homework, the smell of your shoes, the shit stains on your grandpas underpants - anything until it goes down.
    Whew! You did it. Well, I think we've all learn't a valuable lesson from this, and remember - DONT PUT YOUR DICK WHERE IT DOESNT BELONG, but If you do - grease it up FIRST.

  9. Re:Yeah, right by ksb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I can guarantee that the first thing a slashdot reader thinks when he reads any article is... 'I hope nobody else has had time to comment yet!'

  10. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    first penis

    8====D

  11. cluster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    cluster this,
    drink my piss,
    make yourself someone
    that i won't miss.

  12. Re:Microsft IX cluster? by benjamindees · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is a perfect example of Microsoft "innovation". Bill Gates and his lackeys can't even steal their ideas directly from the academic community; they have to wait until another, smaller company implements clustering as an add-on to Windows (Citrix) and becomes successful. Then, Microsoft incorporates this "innovation" into their product and proceeds to put said company out of business. It has happened hundreds of times. The worst part is that most idiots believe that Microsoft actually came up with the idea in the first place. It's sad, really.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"