Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Non-Deathmatch: Preempt v. Low-Latency Patch

Posted by timothy on from the floor-wax-and-dessert-topping dept.

LiquidPC writes: "In this whitepaper on Linux Scheduler Latency, Clark Williams of Red Hat compares the performance of two popular ways to improve kernel Linux preemption latency -- the preemption patch pioneered by MontaVista and the low-latency patch pioneered by Ingo Molnar -- and discovers that the best approach might be a combination of both."

4 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I did better by clone304 · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    You're an idiot.

  2. Re:The Right Reasons by clone304 · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    Ohh yeah.. I forgot to tell you. Fsck IE. Any fucktard that uses slow ass IE when Opera is available is a fucking moron.

    .
    And it doesn't surprise me at all that 95% of desktop users are morons. Hell, you probably use IE, and you chose Archie Bunker as a nick. You MUST be a moron. Thanks for speaking up for your species. Now please sit down and let the IQ-enabled people talk.

  3. Re:Wow!, what an insightful conclusion. by clone304 · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    Know they're usually 13 yr old trolls who end up breaking their necks trying to suck their own dicks.. But, you can believe what you want..

  4. liquidpc by blendin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    you are a fuckin cheat...you will never defeat me