Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Non-Deathmatch: Preempt v. Low-Latency Patch

Posted by timothy on from the floor-wax-and-dessert-topping dept.

LiquidPC writes: "In this whitepaper on Linux Scheduler Latency, Clark Williams of Red Hat compares the performance of two popular ways to improve kernel Linux preemption latency -- the preemption patch pioneered by MontaVista and the low-latency patch pioneered by Ingo Molnar -- and discovers that the best approach might be a combination of both."

2 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Non-deathmatch, eh? by zapfie · · Score: 0, Troll

    Non-deathmatch, eh? I think I smell a Preempt vs. Low-Latency Quake 3 mod in the works..

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
  2. Re:Wow!, what an insightful conclusion. by clone304 · · Score: 0, Troll


    Know shit!! Wat teh fack waz I thincking? You got me.

    .