Red Hat CTO Testifies at MS trial
An anonymous reader writes "Red Hat CTO Michael Tiemann testified on behalf of the 9 states in MS's trial. From the article on SF Gate: "Red Hat Chief Technology Officer Michael Tiemann said Microsoft adds 'extensions' to critical communications methods that computers use to transmit security information, print, and perform other tasks. Those extensions are proprietary to Microsoft, he said, and despite recent actions Microsoft has not been forthcoming in releasing details of those changes.""
I'm sorry, but Redhat wasn't even a company, AFAIK, when Micro$oft did most of the things that they are on trial for (OEM stuff that killed OS/2, Be, etc. for example).
Imagine this.
... [burst into tears] he hit me, pulled my hair, took my pizza and [more cries]
The bully M$ is standing at a corner, wearing a tight T-shirt with pizza
stains, and equally dirty shorts. His hands red with pizza sauce and ketchup.
The poor boy RH gets called in by the Law. He is bitting his nails, shivering
under his wet shirt.
The_Law: "Come here RH, don't be afraid, tell us what did he do to you?"
RH: [looks suspicously at the bully, afraid to utter a word he might regret]
M$: [smiles with evil, knowing nothing more than a wrist slap will happen to him.]
RH: He
The_Law: [ANGERED] M$$$
M$: [shocked]
The_Law: Don't EVER do that again to RH, now go and play together.
M$: [takes RH by the collar, and to the play ground]
RH was last seen going down the slide, face first. M$ pushed him, rumor has it.
Amen Brother!
/all | more" let alone actually doing something useful.
No Admin in his right mind (Linux user or not) wants his clients running Linux. Hell, I have a hard enough time getting them to type "ipconfig
It's human nature to pull for the underdog. I liked OS/2, I use Linux from time to time. But I am realistic about this whole thing. It's not my religion, and I don't need to spend 20 hours a day in front of my PC. I need to sit down, get some work done, then get on with my life. The day that Linux can match Windows in that regard is the day that Linux surpasses Windows. More power to them, but they're always facing an uphill climb. You must remember that MS has a LOT of programmers, and a lot of TALENTED programmers at that. In fact, I'm sure most of them are CS graduates. If only that were true with Linux.
As far as "not buying the products", you tell me where to buy a Windows-free PC and I'll run there; oh wait, you guys are harassing white-box shops that do that, and you certainly won't be able to get one from the major companies like Compaq, HP, Dell, etc.
I agree that I would have liked to see documentation of file formats as part of the settlement in addition to the APIs.
But doing that would require Microsoft's competitors to have to do work, so you can see why they didn't propose this to the dissenting states.
You said we don't need competition, yet Apple and Linux are in competition with UNIX.
Ideas come out, it doesn't matter which environment they came out from. What matters is that they evolved thanks to capitalism. Ideas who don't have enough money thrown at them will eventually fade away and die. Look at OS/2.
Hey, you don't like capitalism go to Cuba. Fidel Kastro will welcome you personally.