Slashdot Mirror


Mac OS X Secrets of the Elite

anti-drew writes "Stepwise has posted a list of fantastic secrets in MacOS X, which reveals all of the hidden features that you just knew were lurking in there, including preferences you can set from the command line to make everything 10% faster, and extensive class libraries and undocumented Objective C APIs that take all the work out of coding. Literally. Check it out!"

52 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. April by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Funny

    April 1st post? :)

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  2. Compiler directives... by Glove+d'OJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    I espcially liked the Compiler directive:

    --dwimnwis (Do what I mean not what I said)

    Kind of like WYSIWYG, or WYWINWYS (What You Want Is Not What You Said.)

    I wonder if the new documentation explains the ID-10T errors?

    1. Re:Compiler directives... by dschuetz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I espcially liked the Compiler directive:

      --dwimnwis (Do what I mean not what I said)


      April fools aside, I actually wish there were a switch for this.

      Compilers are often smart enough to be able to parse out what you mean (how many times have you gotten a perl error saying "You left a quote off up there at line 123"?).

      I'd like to see a switch that gives the compiler (interpreter, whatever) the authority to try to fix, for itself, some of these stupid issues. If other non-recoverable errors happen later, then fine, it doesn't have to complete the compile. But if I drop a semicolon and get a hundred new errors as a result, and the compiler can see that if that semicolon is replaced, then why can't I ask it to replace that, warn me what it did, and see if it works?

      Just a thought...

    2. Re:Compiler directives... by coolgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dunno. The best way my old High School computer lab teacher taught me was simply by saying: "It's doing _exactly_ what you're telling it to do". Many many times I imagined strangling the guy for saying that...it really was the best thing he did for me.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    3. Re:Compiler directives... by MWright · · Score: 2, Informative

      TeX does this when it's run interactively. If it comes across an error, it tries to fix it; it then dispays the message on the screen, and gives the user several options (they can accept what TeX did, type in a replacement, quit, edit the original file, etc.) It then generates a log file for the user to fix the errors in the original source file.

      --
      "But really, I think life is just a game of Mao Nomic." -Purplebob
    4. Re:Compiler directives... by David+Gould · · Score: 2

      Aside from the at-best-questionable disirability of automatic error-correction, you guys have surely seen this, right? There are times when you'd really rather have the machine ask you to explicitly what you wanted instead of having it try to guess, with potentially dire consequences.

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
  3. Aha! by CoolVibe · · Score: 5, Funny
    defaults write com.apple.EOModeler CrashRandomly No

    I was looking for that setting... Great article!

  4. April Fools. by saintlupus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh, God, when will this stupid-assed holiday end?

    It would be funny if there were one or two joke stories. But this just ruins the "Slashdot experience" for a day every year. Annoying and funny are not the same thing, editors.

    --saint

    1. Re:April Fools. by cjpez · · Score: 2

      And what exactly is this "Slashdot experience?" that's being ruined here?

    2. Re:April Fools. by Malc · · Score: 2

      Since when was it declared a holiday? To me, a holiday means a day off work. In some countries, it is a holiday: Easter Monday. But that is just a coincidence.

      As for your sentiments, I couldn't agree more. It seems every web site and their dog are posting April Fools stories for the sake of it. Unfortunately, most of the stories are extremely dumb and unfunny. Did all of these authors throw out their sense of humour before writing these stories?

    3. Re:April Fools. by saintlupus · · Score: 2

      And what exactly is this "Slashdot experience?" that's being ruined here?

      Why, "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." of course.

      I read this site, and especially the comments, because they contain a lot of information I can't find anywhere else in such a concentrated form. I like reading about news in hardware and software and science, I like reading commentary from people who've been in this business longer than me. Hell, I even like some of the trolls.

      Despite all the bitching a lot of people do, this is still a hell of a resource for geeks like me. It's just annoying that the very valuable, very appreciated service is suspended once a year for unbelievably clumsy and juvenile attempts at humor.

      Hell, if I wanted something painfully unreadable and irritating, I'd unblock Katz.

      --saint

    4. Re:April Fools. by sllort · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Annoying and funny are not the same thing, editors.

      Yes, they are. That's the first rule of Trolling. The point isn't to make you laugh, it's to make you complain, so they can laugh at you. I think they're doing a fine job.

    5. Re:April Fools. by cjpez · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Have you considered that maybe the whole "basically make the site worthless for a day" thing you're perceiving is actually a part of the "Slashdot Experience?"

      Sure, Slashdot's fun. Slashdot brings me some "news" items I might not have heard about otherwise. But it's not like the world's going to end if, for one day out of the year, there's a bunch of bogus stories.

    6. Re:April Fools. by saintlupus · · Score: 2

      But it's not like the world's going to end if, for one day out of the year, there's a bunch of bogus stories.

      True enough. Maybe I'm just irritated because this is the third year I've been reading Slashdot on April 1, and I can't remember any of the prank stories _ever_ being funny.

      Ah, well, fuck it. Tomorrow is another day. Oh, and to the fellow who called me a Karma Whore, bugger off. I've been at the cap for months.

      --saint

    7. Re:April Fools. by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Maybe they aren't supposed to be funny? Some of them are amusing, but I think the funny part lies in the fact that they get to read through all these comments and listen to all of us complain about how stupid slashdot is and how april fools stories suck. If I worked up there, I'd be laughing so hard all day my entire cube would be filled with my own urine. Actually, I'll take that back, I find it amusing here too. Amusing that so many people take /. so seriously that a day of crap news and they're lives are going to end. Now THAT is hilarious.

      --
      What?
    8. Re:April Fools. by jafac · · Score: 2

      I woke up, and turned on the news and I saw that the Queen Mum had died. I thought CNN had gone all slashdotty on me for 4/1.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    9. Re:April Fools. by Mignon · · Score: 5, Funny
      Oh, God, when will this stupid-assed holiday end?

      April second, by my calculations.

    10. Re:April Fools. by Anus+Bird+Girl · · Score: 2, Funny
      And what exactly is this "Slashdot experience?" that's being ruined here?


      • "Check out this cool case mod!"
      • News of scientific discoveries from a couple of years ago.
      • "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of..."
      • Jon Katz
      • Ask Slashdot: Can you guys do my homework for me?


      (!)
    11. Re:April Fools. by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      I don't know about you, but the following exchange made me spit coffee out my nose:

      cjpez: And what exactly is this "Slashdot experience?" that's being ruined here?

      saintlupus: Why, "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." of course.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    12. Re:April Fools. by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Well, you wish. Experience shows, people will still find "new" ones in the next couple of weeks, and some will slip through.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  5. I hope it has the feature... by !splut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope it has a feature that allows you to turn off april fools jokes. Anything that lessens the tide of fools joke spamming is a plus in my book.

    --
    The angel in the oatmeal.
  6. Re:I hate calculus! by cyclist1200 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll contact The Hague and let them know the International April Fool's Treaty has been violated.

  7. Re:Aaaggh! WTF! by MKalus · · Score: 2

    Well.. Yes, it does...

    They decided apparantly that Mac's need a "sleeker" Slashdot interface.

    --
    If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  8. Goatse.cx sued under DMCA by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 3, Funny

    from the stare-into-the-abyss dept.
    MEEPT! wrote in to report that the famous troll site goatse.cx has been shut
    down under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act by a gay linux industry trade group called the
    Alternative Network OS and Gay Anus Penetration Enthusiasts. Michael S, an ANOSGAPE spokesman,
    was quoted as saying "goatse.cx has made a mockery of the anal fisting industry, and left themselves spread
    wide open to litigaytion. We hope this anal action will send a clear message to this "trolling" community
    that wide-open man-holes are not a laughing matter." The goatse.cx webmasters were optimistic, however,
    stating that the graven image, now sacred to trolls and crapflooders everywhere, was found in the
    pubic domain and was in no way infringing on any GAPE copyright.
    Similar sites such as Comp-u-geek and "Hey everybody, I'm looking at gay porno!" were unaffected.

  9. You idiot by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 2


    Who in their right mind would want their very serious issue/product/idea/news to be posted an April 1?


    Be it so plain as "this statement is true", noone will ever believe it in any context, bar idiots.


    The FIRST THING many people do when faced with a dubious, or controvesial story is CHECK THE DATE.
    Anything Apr1 is tagged <Disinformation type="Humourous">


    So stop whining, and go away

  10. Re:April 1 by Biolo · · Score: 2
    one can only deal with so much sarcasm in one day


    What? Try being British, and a student, at a technical university, volunteering in a students union. Now that's sarcasm! Fun times though.

    :-)

    --
    Stealing a rhinoceros should not be attempted lightly.
  11. Taco's fiancee by wiredog · · Score: 3, Informative

    Has been redecorating...

  12. Re:STOP IT! by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2

    Well, no one said you had to read it, did they? Are Taco and Hemos standing behind you with a shotgun forcing you to read /.?

  13. There is one place that's trying by wiredog · · Score: 2

    Look at cybercrime.gov.

  14. The Great Slashdot Moulting by TrevorB · · Score: 5, Funny

    OK, I've about had it with April Fools, and I have a suggestion to end this nonsense. I call it "The Great Slashdot Moulting"...

    Every year, when April 1st comes along and the Slashdot stories are nothing but repetative joke-fare, all of us with karma > 20 should flood the system with crap, ALL POSTED AT +1 bonus. First posts, Second posts, 50th posts, Taco's wife ain't so hot, whatever...

    Better yet, if you've got mod points, mod the crap UP. :)

    Evryone blow all their karma IN ONE DAY... (-3 per post * 17 posts is about -50 karma). Then on April 2nd, create a new account and start over for the year.

    The system will clog up with so many moderator requests it will either break the system or they'll actually HAVE TO STOP POSTING THIS CRAP on April 1st. They can't put us all in jail! Or that whatever that user flag that Taco appears to be weilding around like a penis replacement. Bwahahaha!

    What the hell is karma good for if you can't burn it all in one amazing burst of glory? And imagine everyone doing it at once. An orgy of reverse karma whoring ... WOOHOO!!!

    Let the modding war on this post begin.

    1. Re:The Great Slashdot Moulting by Tsian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or, of course, we could just laugh at the jokes. (Or would that be to simple?)

    2. Re:The Great Slashdot Moulting by TrevorB · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It would be simple if the jokes were actually funny. Right now I'm worried the cumulative groaning effect is detrimental to my health.

      The other simple solution is to not read slashdot for the day. But that's a head in the sand resolution. It seems like a large percentage of the posters (and I know that's not the readers) hate this shit. And my scheme doesn't affect Taco's other 90%, so why does it matter to the readers?

      Focusing all the jokes on a single day turns laughter into a Hallmark greeting card day. Like only showing love on Valentine's Day, or only showing ramapant commercialism on Christmas Day.

      Geez, and to think about 40 of my 50 mod points came through funny mods. Bloddy Malcontent...

    3. Re:The Great Slashdot Moulting by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Amen. I'm reminded of William Shatner on Saturday Night Live. Between this carping and the boycott talk, there's plenty of evidence that some folks around here than need "Free Life" coupons. Badly.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    4. Re:The Great Slashdot Moulting by Evro · · Score: 2
      --
      rooooar
    5. Re:The Great Slashdot Moulting by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      An orgy of reverse karma whoring

      That would be a karma slut ... you know, someone that does it just because they like it, not for the money.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  15. If you insist! by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple Announces Next Version of Mac OS X

    New Version 10.2 To Be Available For Macintosh And Pentium 4 Computers

    CUPERTINO, California--April 1, 2002-Apple® today announced Mac® OS X version
    10.2, the second major upgrade to Apple's UNIX-based operating system. Mac
    OS X v10.2 will deliver significant performance improvements and new
    features and will add support for Intel® Pentium® 4 computers. Mac OS X
    v10.2 will be available at the Macworld Expo San Francisco during the week
    of July 15, 2002.

    Mac OS X v10.2 is the ultimate digital hub, with the ability to create a
    music library and burn music CDs with iTunes, burn data CDs from the Finder,
    make movies with iMovie(TM) 2, watch DVDs with the DVD Player and create DVDs
    with iDVD.

    Throughout the operating system, Apple has ensured that Mac OS X v10.2 fully
    leverages its UNIX-based design, significantly increases performance and
    provides new features. The groundwork for Pentium 4 compatibility was laid
    two years ago when Darwin, the core of Mac OS X, was made available for
    PowerPC and Intel platforms under an open development model. Since then,
    Darwin customers and developers have helped make it a powerful and efficient
    operating system. Because Mac OS X v10.2 is identical on Macintosh and
    Pentium 4 computers, applications written for one can be made to run on both
    with little or no additional development effort.

    "With this new version of Mac OS X, Apple brings the most advanced operating
    system on the market to computers using Intel Pentium 4 processors," said
    Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. "Mac OS X v10.2 includes the Aqua(TM) interface and
    allows users of Intel-based computers to experience the performance and the
    ease of use which Macintosh users have enjoyed for years."

    Availability & Requirements
    Mac OS X v10.2 will ship this July and will be available as a full retail
    package through The Apple Store® (www.apple.com), at Apple's retail stores
    and through Apple Authorized Resellers for a suggested retail price of $129
    (US). Mac OS X v10.2 will be available for current Mac OS X users as an
    upgrade package through Apple's Mac OS Up-to-Date program for $19.95 (US).

    Using Mac OS X on a Macintosh computer requires a minimum of 128MB of memory
    and is designed to run on the following Apple products: iMac(TM), iBook(TM), Power
    Macintosh® G3, Power Mac(TM) G4, Power Mac G4 Cube and any PowerBook introduced
    after May 1998. Using Mac OS X on an Intel Pentium 4 computer requires a
    minimum of 128MB of memory. Refer to http://www.apple.com/macosx for a
    complete list of hardware compatibility.

    Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple
    II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the
    Macintosh. Apple is committed to bringing the best personal computing
    experience to students, educators, creative professionals and consumers
    around the world through its innovative hardware, software and Internet
    offerings.

    Apple, the Apple logo, Mac, Mac OS, Macintosh, Apple Store, Aqua, iBook,
    iMac, iMovie, Power Macintosh, Power Mac and PowerBook are trademarks of
    Apple Computer, Inc. Intel and Pentium are trademarks of Intel
    Corporation. Other company and product names may be trademarks of their
    respective owners.


  16. Re:Geez... by ocelotbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's always been a stretch. The trick to any good AFJ is to come up with a good, yet outlandish, prank, and a delivery so brilliant and so believable that people fall for it, such as the infamous write only memory ad.

    --

    Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  17. But it's my IQ! My value as a human being! by dswensen · · Score: 2

    Are you crazy? Do you have any idea how long it took me to build up this much karma? Thinking up all this funny, insightful, informative crap ain't easy, you know!

    Besides, this karma is going to cure cancer and grant me a seat on the secret spaceship that will be traveling to Mars when the Krulls return to destroy the planet in 2012. And I'm not going to blow it.

    1. Re:But it's my IQ! My value as a human being! by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      If you're building karma by thinking stuff up, then that's your problem. Cut/paste and a minute with a thesaurus will make all your karma dreams come true.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  18. Amusing, but this Macslash article is much funnier by Arcturax · · Score: 2, Funny
    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  19. April fools... by SkyLeach · · Score: 2

    sucks... It sucked when I was a little twerpy geek in HS and it sucks now.

    I long for a mac os X that works, just like everyone else. I am forced to investigate crap like this. It takes up useful time.

    You rarely see a real geek running a screen saver because it wastes cycles. Slashdot is like a brain-saver on 100% processor usage on April 1st. Just another useless line dump from ps that needs to be purged.

    the traditional solution:

    ps -A | grep slashdot
    27213 pts/2 1:20:05 slashdot
    kill -9 27213

    the daemontools solution:

    svc -d /service/slashdot

    whatever. Time to get something useful done...

    --
    My $0.02 will always be worth more than your â0.02, so :-p
  20. Re:the secrets of . . . your TOASTER!!! by MadCow42 · · Score: 2

    Secrets are quite often "intended" features that were never fully implemented, or ended up being more support hassle than they were worth.

    The main software that our group puts out has a few "secrets" too... things that sounded cool at the time, or things that were put in by developers to help them debug their code or use it while it was still half-baked.

    Now, having said that, a few of those secrets are still pretty cool... but as the Product Manager, I'd hate to have to support people using them, or having problems with them (after all, we never did get to do extensive QA on those features). The features are there, but not documented. If you find them, great. If you have problems, great. Don't call me about them. q:]

    MadCow.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  21. I see your problem, here by medcalf · · Score: 2

    You wrote:

    ps -A | grep slashdot
    27213 pts/2 1:20:05 slashdot
    kill -9 27213

    When you meant to write:

    kill -9 `ps -A | grep slashdot | awk '{print $1}'`

    or, slightly more efficient:

    shutdown -F now

    --
    -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
  22. Re:OK, a sort of off-topic question about burning by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

    I have that same release, it seems. I got a .img file from edonkey that turned out to be actually .img.sit, which then did not de-stuffitize itself on the imac, but did on the pc, producing puma something blah blah macosx .toast, and now I can't do fuck all with it.

    I tried an dfs iso -> real iso program but it said the file wasn't a multiple of (something) long.

    And btw, I wouldn't worry about being off-topic. How can you possibly be off-topic on April-Fools' day with /. posting all this nonsense. (/. editors would get into real trouble if we had another terrorist attack like 9/11 on 4/1 as everyone would think they were making a sick joke...)

    graspee

  23. Now I'd take this seriously if... by HiThere · · Score: 2

    If you'd said that it was for the Itanium I would take it seriously.

    I recently ran across a rumor (on Slashdot, so you know it's guaranteed!) that Apple, Compaq, etc. were going to be merging this month.

    Well, after a bit of thought, I decided that it made sense. The 64 bit chips present a whole new ball game, and one can expect "great and frightening changes". So just suppose you create General Computers on the model of General Motors. You place Apple where Cadillac was, and HP where Chevrolet was, and, O, Compaq where Buick was. (I don't really know my cars, so I forget who the middle tier players were, but you get the point.) Now Apple has their custom *nix layer (Darwin) and a really snazzy interface, and a bunch of fans, etc. They'll be likely to be the big cheese here, and get most of the stock, but there'll be shares for everyone, and one real benefit is that everyone gets out from under the heel of MS.

    This sure doesn't sound like a sure thing to me, but it sounds like a plot with real potential. And it would explain the HP/Compaq merger/fight so nicely...

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  24. Shut the Pandoras Box while there's still time! by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 2

    - (NSScaryThought *)Steve:(id)Jobs nakedAndPetrified:(BOOL)hotGritsFlag

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  25. Not a chance by Roy+Ward · · Score: 2

    > Well, after a bit of thought, I decided that it made sense. The 64 bit chips present a whole new ball game, and one can expect "great and frightening changes".

    The Macintosh uses the PowerPC chip which has a 32-bit and 64-bit version on the architecture (although currently only the 32-bit versions are currently made), so when Apple wants to transition to 64-bit, it will have an easier time than everyone else (assuming that by then Motorola or IBM make 64-bit chips) because it can just keep using PowerPC.

    I'm hoping 64-bit makes it into the G5. It was supposed to into the G4.

    1. Re:Not a chance by addaon · · Score: 2

      The 64 bit are made. IBM uses them in the iSeries (AS/400) and pSeries machine. Nothing special, but they exist, they work, and they're nice.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    2. Re:Not a chance by Roy+Ward · · Score: 2

      I think those are POWER chips, not PowerPC. They are similar architectures that have subtle differences, so are not directly comparable and certainly not quite compatible (unless the architectures have converged without anyone telling me). PowerPC was originally based on POWER.

  26. Grr. by TheMCP · · Score: 2

    Do not taunt happy fun ball.

  27. Re:It is, and has been by Roy+Ward · · Score: 2

    The chips Apple uses are currently only 32-bit (even if there are possibly 64-bit chips out there), but the _architecture_ has compatible 32 and 64 bit versions (and yes, I mean address bus and register size) - therefore a really easy migration path (do a web search for something called "Book E").

    And PPC smoking Pentiums? Unless you are talking about Altivec or Photoshop, what are you smoking? I mean, they are really nice chips, but sadly they just haven't kept up with x86 for speed (although I still plan to keep using Macintoshes for the forseeable future).