Slashdot Mirror


Review: Yellow Dog Linux 2.2

fabiolrs writes: "imaclinux.net is running a review on Yellow Dog Linux 2.2. They could manage to run it on the iBook. YDG 2.2 is a great distro with KDE 2.2.2, Gnome 1.4, kernel 2.4.18 and Xfree86 4.2.0." Nice to see PPC systems (meaning "Apple," mostly) getting so much attention in the Linux world lately -- Mandrake's 8.2 PPC is also getting close to a release.

12 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. Past YDL releases were good too by NewbieSpaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I managed to get YDL 2.0 running on my old Apple clone - A Power Computing Power Tower 220e. I have a G3 upgrade card in it, and it works well. I can't wait to try 2.2, hopefully it will be even better at supporting the weird clone hardware. I should download it soon...
    YDL's RPMs make it easy for anyone who's familiar with Redhat or Mandrake to get YDL running on a PPC. Woohoo!

    --
    ------
    Random, useless fact: I type in startx entirely with my left hand.
  2. Anyone know of a good faq by BiggestPOS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That has to do with dual-booting Yellow Dog Linux and OS X? just asking.

    --
    What, me worry?
  3. Debian & iBook by Leone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have used Mandrake on x86 for several years, but two weeks ago I bought myself an iBook (my old Toshiba fell on the floor, RIP) and decided to go with Debian Woody PPC.

    To my great surprise it went mostly smooth. I downloaded a minimal CD image and got up and running from there. apt-get install really is as cool as they say ;)

    My biggest problem was that by default I had kernel 2.2 something and PMU (APM for Mac) crashed and burned. 2.4 fixed that though.

    I really can't say that PPC is so mega-cool, but walking around with an Apple laptop (very rare) with Linux installed (almost as rare) is very geeky ;)

  4. Link to YDL by george399 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why is there no link to YDL itself , but instead there is actually a link to Mandrake in the main story?

    --
    Patience is a virtue, but I don't have the time - TH
  5. Also.. by transient · · Score: 3, Interesting

    meaning "Apple," mostly

    Terrasoft makes some nice PPC hardware in addition to their distro.

    --

    irb(main):001:0>
  6. I use a PowerPC by SerpentMage · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I use my Powerbook and have to say that yes it is nice, but no it is not nice.

    It is nice in the sense that the notebook works well. But it is a major headache to get software to work.

    While some folks may say, it is LINUX and therefore it will work, that is a figment of the imagination.

    Firstly when using closed software people only say Linux. When I mention PowerPC they say no problem if it is Linux it works. But then I mention it is not Intel and they say "oh, sorry, but it works on Intel".

    Secondly when using open source many people do not setup the ./configure and autoconf properly to take into account a PowerPc platform. Many times I get platform not support or it simply does not compile. Case in point, Anjuta, or PNET. Sure it could be fixed with a bunch of tweaks, but it gets my goat that I need to tweak at all!!!

    The only software that has worked without problem whatsoever are the bigger projects (Apache, Perl, etc) and Java. I am amazed at how well Java moves from Windows, Linux Intel and Linux PowerPC.

    My conclusion is that even Open Source and closed source are as arrogant about non-intel platforms.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  7. My experience: great support by Klox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I received my YDL 2.2 CDs the same day this was last referenced on Slashdot and posted a rant about the problems I had installing it on a brand new Power Mac G4. The next day, one of their support guys e-mailed me. After a couple of e-mails, I was up and running.

    I was really impressed with Terra Soft's support for scanning Slashdot for comments by little whiners like myself and actually giving me a hand. I had mad no effort to understand the problem when I posted my rant but yet this guy went out of his way to help me. I'm certainly not that forgiving to my customers, even though they've paid for my help.

    After resolving my install problem, I've been very happy with the distro. I'm planning on using this for the basis for future development at my company.

    Kudos to Terra Soft!

  8. Re:Also.. I'm about to get my hands on some by slithytove · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I should have 70 BriQs today or tommorow sans drivebay housing. I'm pretty dissapointed with the per-node pricing of Black Lab Linux (by the same folks).
    I'm thinking at the moment that I'll netboot Debian and install my own clustering libraries and tools, since as far as I can tell, everything included in Black Lab is available elsewhere except their graphical cluster management tools.
    Too bad they didn't see fit to GPL them and just make money on their rather expensive BriQ's (We paid $1500/per for G4s) before Black Lab was released.
    Does anyone have any experience with these? Any tips?

  9. Re:Why? by ichimunki · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No. You can't. Darwin is not the whole operating system. I also suspect that you don't get the source to any of the compatibility layers that help non-OS-X applications run. It's not a troll any more than your original post was. If you don't value software freedom then fine. But DUH, some of us do.

    So here's something else you can't do with OS X that you can with YDL: copy it to your friends' computers legally.

    As to your "why not x86 then?" post below: DUH again! It's a little thing called dual-booting. Yes, I'd like to have an all free software system, but why not *also* have the best proprietary OS available too?

    And for many YDL users, I suspect YDL came *after* the purchase of the PPC hardware. It sure did in my case. In fact, OS X isn't going to run on my old mac, but with YDL I get to do all the fun stuff like code in Perl or Ruby and run the web browsers that give me control rather than the web designer, I get the email client I like, I get GnuPG, I get emacs, the list goes on and on. The only time I boot to Mac OS is to print or get pix off my digital camera.

    --
    I do not have a signature
  10. MacOSX vs. YDL by tqbf · · Score: 4, Interesting
    YDL is interesting because, if your day-to-day operating system is Linux, you cannot do better than a TiBook running Yellow Dog. There simply is no hardware in the X86 world that is comparable (wide screen display, slim, lightweight, with adequate processing power).

    I used YDL when I first got my TiBook. I had to, because I needed 802.11 support and Apple didn't support Orinoco. I switched because I needed Firewire more than I needed Orinoco. My experiences:

    YDL: Works as well as any mainstream Linux distribution. Yup works, by some definition of "works". Better still, Ximian's stuff builds from SRPMS, and Ximian now explicitly supports them with binaries. Not hard to get current, buildable kernel source, and FreeSWAN works nicely for IPsec. The (major) negative is that Firewire support blows, and it is pointless to buy hard drives that don't come in Firewire enclosures. When I left YDL, SBP2 drivers didn't work at all. The (minor) negative is that companies don't distribute closed-source binaries for YDL, and they do for X86 Linux.

    OSX 10.1: A dream; xterms, xemacs, and Adobe Illustrator on the same screen. Rootless XFree86, transparent anything, beautiful user interface, antialiasing. It's faster than Linux for applications and slower for tools. The one (big) negative is that there is no credible IPsec or VPN support. A minor negative is that you can't keep current with BOTH the dev kernel AND Apple's updates.

    I'm on OSX 10.1.3 now and I'm not looking back. However, I can understand why people want PPC Linux, if they already simply use Linux for everything and want good portable environments. It's good to hear that YDL continues to move forward.

  11. Re:my YDL (2.1) experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    ChristTrekker writes:
    So I'll probably give 2.2 a miss, but maybe I'll be ready by 2.3. I'm happy just having Linux available for my hardware, so I'll probably pay for my next copy.
    I don't know what your financial situation is, but if you have a good job, it wouldn't hurt to support TerraSoft by buying a copy of YDL. TerraSoft is a very small company, and your purchase carries a lot of weight. Small companies really need the support of their fans. It can be a make or break situation. If you don't support them now, who knows if they'll be there for you at some future date? $30 is not much money; you probably earn that much before you finish your morning cup of coffee.
  12. Re:Get it! by jchristopher · · Score: 2, Interesting
    iTunes takes 30-40% of the CPU on my 500mhz macintosh. A common MP3 player on Windows (WinAmp) takes around 4% of a PIII 500.

    Something is wrong with that picture. Obviously ripping and encoding is going to be CPU intensive - playback should not be. One of the first things I erased from my iBook was iTunes, for exactly this reason.

    iTunes is not exactly the greatest thing since sliced bread.