Slashdot Mirror


Cray's New Solid State Storage

Sivar writes: "Cray, a well known vendor of extremely fast supercomputing hardware, has introduced a storage system with a 224 GB capacity. The large size seems impressive, but the device can also transfer an unprecedented 80GB(!!) every second. That's more bandwidth than the main memory of most servers, and it's just for storage. For comparison's sake, a typical dual channel DDR motherboard has a bandwidth capacity of barely 4.2GB/sec." Yow.

9 of 355 comments (clear)

  1. Hole E Shyte... by CrazyDuke · · Score: 0, Troll

    Need I say more? I want one!!!!

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  2. Oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    My second first post in 2 days. Glory be to me.

  3. fp byatch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    w00t

  4. Re:Wow, that is utterly amazing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Whats amazing is an FP that doesn't brag about being an FP...

  5. Yow indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Dude, this is FAST! Of course, /. editors get paid the same even when they add nothing to the story.

  6. AHH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Woo Hoo.

  7. *BSD is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    It is official; Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of the latest Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as further exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood. FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

    Fact: *BSD is dead

  8. Playstation 2 (aka PS2) by Jagasian · · Score: 1, Troll

    Well, it doesn't beat my Playstation 2! It's 100 times for powerful than a super computer!

  9. Re:Transferring my genome by bonzoesc · · Score: -1, Troll

    One important thing to note is the substitute recieving units that some people without the proper hardware use, and the bidirectional mode it supports.