Slashdot Mirror


MSNBC on Infinera's Optical Chip

pnoti writes: "This article at MSNBC is a loose overview of Infinera's new chip with circuits that control the flow of light instead of the flow of electrons. 'If this chip performed as they hoped, it would shatter many of the theoretical limits regarding the behavior of light in optical communications networks.'" Update: 04/10 04:26 GMT by T : That's MSNBC, not The New York Times -- oops.

132 comments

  1. Postus With the Mostus by YourMissionForToday · · Score: -1

    Beetlejuice, beetlejuice, beetlejuice!

    1. Re:Postus With the Mostus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the balls are
      never can see more
      is it true
      i am told to guess
      telephones and vicoprofen
      sharply televating ok

    2. Re:Postus With the Mostus by Bitter+Old+Man · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      When I was a boy, my dear father bought my brother and I a magnifying glass. It was an unseasonably warm and sunny summer on the farm, and we had just discovered a nest of spotted Wyoming honey beetles. Why, I certainly wouldn't have wanted to be them under the heat of that magnifying glass! No, sir. Nowadays, I tell this story, and the animal rights killjoys just get all over me. I tell you, PETA is an organization from Hell. None dumber, or more annoying! They tell me I can't even eat meat. How in the sam hill am I supposed to get through my week without my sixteen ounces of fresh-cut tenderloin? I'll eat my steak, I'll eat it well-done, I'll eat it with salt and pepper, and none of it is any of those damn hippies' business! None of their business, I tell you! None! Then want to take away my freedom, and turn this fine country into a police state, but I won't let them. The liberal bastards haven't taken my guns away yet. Let them try, I say. Let them try.

      - Bitter Old Man

    3. Re:Postus With the Mostus by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      A fairly large, but cheap, Fresnel lens can reach a thousand degrees or more. Try that on Peta.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  2. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    fp

    1. Re:fp by YourMissionForToday · · Score: -1

      Isn't it pathetic when ACs try to get FP and fail. You pussies will never know the joy of being a LOGGED IN CRAPFLOODER.

  3. asdf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    woohoo hey baby whoopy whoop

  4. Makes you wonder by cscx · · Score: 1

    Is such an implementation of ICs reliable, when compared to the trusted-and-true silicon ICs of today? I mean, I understand the huge quest for faster and faster chips, but I hardly see this making an impact into the IC industry. Maybe 10-20 years down the road, but not now. Plus, the manufacturing has to be a lot more expensive.

    1. Re:Makes you wonder by Soko · · Score: 4, Interesting
      From the article:


      Hardly. Infinera's thumbnail-size chip is the first integrated photonic circuit. Though Infinera won't reveal the chip's cost, when built with manufacturing techniques used by chip makers like Intel and Advanced Micro Devices, it likely could be made very cheaply. The savings in manufacturing in turn would lower the cost of network equipment by half, perhaps even more. Beleaguered network carriers like Level 3 Communications and bankrupt Global Crossing could build networks for much less, and run them more efficiently and at a lower cost--maybe even profitably. For consumers, Infinera's chip could be instrumental in allowing communications companies to offer high-speed Internet access at affordable prices. And one day this technological breakthrough could lead to a device capable of projecting a holographic display, as on the TV series Star Trek.


      Pretty much refutes your points.

      The best thing about photonics is the absence of (photon) migration, which is a big problem with small trace size electronics (electron migration). (Aside: If a silicon engineer knows better, please correct me.) No migration happens because photons have 0 rest mass, and therefore don't have intertia. This means they are a lot less likely to over shoot the switching mechanism, and maintian signal. This is in addition to thier electrical interference resistance.

      Commercial products may take a while to come to fruition since there will have to be some major re-tooling at the fabs, but with so many huge benefits, it'll come sooner than you think.

      Now, where to put that Holodeck....

      Soko
      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:Makes you wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      Hey, where did I ever claim to have a point?

      -CSCX

    3. Re:Makes you wonder by J.+J.+Ramsey · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not so sure that photons not having mass means that they have no inertia. Photons have momentum, can exert a (very) slight pressure, and can be pulled on by gravity. Given that, their inertia is likely to me small, but nonzero.

    4. Re:Makes you wonder by harvardian · · Score: 3, Informative

      Being pulled-on by gravity doesn't mean anything. Gravity (according to Einstein) is the warping of space-time, so things that are massless still experience it. According to Newton's equations, that wasn't the case.

    5. Re:Makes you wonder by gTsiros · · Score: 1

      Photons don't have inertia ?!?

      Where did you come from?!

      Photons DO have inertia!
      Inertia has nothing to do with rest mass, but it has with mass.

      photons have mass

      they have inertia.

      they are particles after all (this is the basis of QM. particles can be seen as waves and vice versa)

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    6. Re:Makes you wonder by cornjones · · Score: 2, Insightful

      gravitons (the particles we hypothesis are responsible for gravity but have not been able to observe) are generated in proportion to the mass of an object. the object they are working on doesn't (i believe) need to have mass

      But gravity is such a weak force that the mutual attraction (ie both objects be attracted to each other) is often necessary for any significant effect.

      That being said, light can be/is observably effected by large gravity producing bodies (stars, etc...) and would stand to reason that there is some effect by smaller gravitational pulls, even if that effect is, as yet, unobservable to us.

    7. Re:Makes you wonder by sluke · · Score: 1

      You state:

      The best thing about photonics is the absence of (photon) migration, which is a big problem with small trace size electronics (electron migration). (Aside: If a silicon engineer knows better, please correct me.) No migration happens because photons have 0 rest mass, and therefore don't have intertia. This means they are a lot less likely to over shoot the switching mechanism, and maintian signal. This is in addition to thier electrical interference resistance.

      Actually photons can still "overshoot" switching devices etc. Photonic Band Gap materials have all of their properties because of they way they exploit the quantum nature of the light. So, just like semiconductors, there is a finite probability that the light will tunnel to another place. The reason that I don't think this will be a problem any time soon is that for the wavelengths of light people are interested in making "photonic circuits" with, the features of the material are so small and at this point difficult to manufacture, that the tunneling barriers are effectively infinite. Once methods are developed for working effectively with arbitrary 3-D fabrication at the precision we are accustomed to in silicon, photon migration will likely become a problem.

    8. Re:Makes you wonder by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      No migration happens because photons have 0 rest mass, and therefore don't have intertia.

      Ahh, yes... a very common mistake by the non-physicist. It seems to make sense that something that has zero rest mass cannot possibly have inertia. This is, however, completely wrong. The problem is that massless particals travel at the speed of light, which is where some interesting things happen in the equations. We start out with the general equation:
      E^2 = m^2*c^4+p^2*c^2

      Substituting 0 for m, we can solve for p = E/c. It's well known that photons carry energy, and thus they must carry momentum. (There are other methods of deriving this, however I will not get into them... pretty much all waves carry momentum, one way or another).

      How else would projects like the Astronomical Society's Solar Sail function?

      As for this being the primary reason that optronics are better than electronics, I'm not entirely sure... definately massless particals are in general better for things like this (where you want maximum information carried for a minimum amount of energy, in a minimum amount of time). Photons typically propagate faster than electronic signals, and optical circuits usually have a much higher bandwitdth due to frequency-level multiplexing.

      Also, it is possible to use physical properties of photons to compute fast fourier transforms, which are especially important for digital signal processing. Not to mention the amazingly fast access times of ultra-huge holographic databases.

      Dislaimer: I'm not a physicist, but I'm studying to become one.

      -Justin

    9. Re:Makes you wonder by jo2nathan · · Score: 1

      Electron migration is only a problem because it knocks (migrates) metal atoms out of a section of wire when you have high current densities. Basically it leads to an break in the connection. Light can travel through 'empty' space. If it one photon knocks something out of the way the next one can still come through. The thing is you can't use the same manufacturing processes to create a photonic chip. Plain/doped silicon (that intel and AMD use) isn't a practical way to deal with light. Eventually the processing for something like this could get to the point where it is as inexpensive but only after Billions of dollars of investment in processing techniques. And then the fabrication facilities will still cost billions. This kind of thing has great potential but nothing that is going to happen overnight, or even in a year or two. Probably not in the next 3 years, not unless Intel/IBM/ (your choice of multi-Billion dollar corporation) invests majorly in it.

    10. Re:Makes you wonder by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      That's not what this one is for. This is about the LSI of an optical communications set, whether a multiplexer, a booster (can't remember what they call them... the repeater thing), whatever.... all these things that involve lots of big discretes under control of asics, now can be built using lithographic processes, instead of robots, soldering irons, and people. Righ now, if you lose one of those suckers, you fix it. with this breakthrough, you replace it.
      It's like in the old days, when you'd have a hard drive fail, a tech would come out with an oscilloscope and debug it... time lost, labor bought. Now, if you have a hard drive fail, you tell the software it's offline, flip the lever and pull out the old drive, push in the new drive and flip the lever, tell the software to set up the drive and put it back in the pool.

    11. Re:Makes you wonder by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      Of course photons have inertia. Haven't you heard of light sails? Those are pushed by sunlight.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  5. second post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    yeah.
    optical networking is cool.
    optical networking is theoretically fast.
    optical networking is theoretically as fast as the speed of light.
    yeah.

  6. uhhhh by iamjim · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sign me up...

    Intel Lasium?

    1. Re:uhhhh by mark_lybarger · · Score: -1, Redundant

      me too! me too!

  7. ny times? by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Title of article says new york times, link points to msnbc... editors on crack yet again.

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    1. Re:ny times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      This is slashdot, can't give microsoft credit!

    2. Re:ny times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Awww come on, that was funny. Some moderator needs to get a sense of humor, or at the very least, an appreciation/acceptance of those who do.

    3. Re:ny times? by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: -1

      Newsflash, THIMOTY is a GAYMO.

      --
      _________________
      EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
    4. Re:ny times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic?
      bleh.

  8. What about beer? by VirexEye · · Score: 1

    Yes but when will they have microchips than can control the flow of beer?

    1. Re:What about beer? by Nilatir · · Score: 1

      He who controls the beer controls the universe...

      --

      "We were half way to Rivendell when the drugs began to take hold."
      -- Hunter S. Tolkien
    2. Re:What about beer? by lambsonic · · Score: 1

      Yes but when will they have microchips than can control the flow of beer?

      You don't need any particular chip, just the right protocol.

      --
      # make clean sig
  9. Login for New York Times by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    username: privatenospam
    password: privatenospam

    --
    Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    1. Re:Login for New York Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Umm... it's not nyt you fucking cut/paste doofus.

    2. Re:Login for New York Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      +1 Informative? Informative?!?!? I should post porn passwords if they are completely off topic and I know I get modded informative!

    3. Re:Login for New York Times by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 1

      Ha! I just saw New York Times and karma whored it. Boy do I feel stupid. :^)

      --
      Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    4. Re:Login for New York Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like it bumped you up to +1 bonus!

  10. New York Times? by NearlyHeadless · · Score: 0, Redundant
    MSNBC, Red Herring != NYT


    Perhaps Slashdot might considering having some kind--any kind--of editorial process. At the minimum, have the article proofread by one other person before it gets posted.

    1. Re:New York Times? by Usquebaugh · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Heretic, were's the spanish inquisition when you need them. Comfy pillow?

      /. does have an editorial process, they read, they like, they post. You expect them to actually have a spell check or a grammar check or get their facts right, ha!

      Next you'll be asking that Timmy & Mikey grow up or that Taco will be sure what to think about articles or Katz thinks before he writes.

      In short /. sucks get used to it, it just has a large readership who happen to dig up most of the stuff I like to read about. Although it's been a bit to much of YRO and not enough tech recently.

      I'm pretty sure that editors think they're /. and /. couldn't exist without them. They pay little or no attention to the ideas of their readers and do not even have a discussion about /. The only time they ask for ideas is when the bills are due.

      /. is not a community rather a site with decent links.

    2. Re:New York Times? by leviramsey · · Score: -1, Redundant

      The reason there are too many YRO stories: michael kidnapped taco and hemos.

      If you want your news from a site that Michael "The Nazi" Sims has nothing to do with, use Monolinux !

    3. Re:New York Times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No one expects the Spanish inquisition!"

      Posting AC to protect the guilty!

    4. Re:New York Times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many FUCKING TIMES DO YOU HAVE TO POST YOUR FUCKING MONOLINUX SEXUALLY DEVIANT GARBAGE!!??!?!

      Shut the fuck up your stupid mother fucking asstwit sister fucking mom raping dog licking father molesting anal probing alien believing communist pinko nazi bastard stalinistic fecal boy!
      Shut the fuck up your stupid mother fucking asstwit sister fucking mom raping dog licking father molesting anal probing alien believing communist pinko nazi bastard stalinistic fecal boy!
      Shut the fuck up your stupid mother fucking asstwit sister fucking mom raping dog licking father molesting anal probing alien believing communist pinko nazi bastard stalinistic fecal boy!
      Shut the fuck up your stupid mother fucking asstwit sister fucking mom raping dog licking father molesting anal probing alien believing communist pinko nazi bastard stalinistic fecal boy!
      Shut the fuck up your stupid mother fucking asstwit sister fucking mom raping dog licking father molesting anal probing alien believing communist pinko nazi bastard stalinistic fecal boy!
      Shut the fuck up your stupid mother fucking asstwit sister fucking mom raping dog licking father molesting anal probing alien believing communist pinko nazi bastard stalinistic fecal boy!
      Shut the fuck up your stupid mother fucking asstwit sister fucking mom raping dog licking father molesting anal probing alien believing communist pinko nazi bastard stalinistic fecal boy!
      Shut the fuck up your stupid mother fucking asstwit sister fucking mom raping dog licking father molesting anal probing alien believing communist pinko nazi bastard stalinistic fecal boy!

  11. Brought to you by G and K and the number 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

    And patents.

  12. Red Herring by The+Gardener · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yeah, Red Herring carried the story, and with a little lower "fluff factor". At least, it seemed to me . . .

    The Gardener

    --
    --
    1. Re:Red Herring by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this story is the same as on MSNBC, except for the layout is less good.

    2. Re:Red Herring by leviramsey · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Red Herring, MSNBC, the NYTimes, and Slashdot have all been scooped by:

      MONOLINUX , which has found that Mozilla 1.0RC1 is less than a week away!
    3. Re:Red Herring by zeno_2 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, this story is the same as on MSNBC, except for the layout is less good.

      less good?

    4. Re:Red Herring by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Yeah, Red Herring [redherring.com] carried the story, and with a little lower "fluff factor". At least, it seemed to me . . .

      That's strange, since the byline on the MSNBC article says they got it from Red Herring. I guess the MS in MSNBC has their editors used to trimming articles for the lowest common denominator?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    5. Re:Red Herring by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this story is the same as on MSNBC, except for the layout is less good.

      less good?


      Would you prefer "more bad"?

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    6. Re:Red Herring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a serious hard-on for monolinux, don't you?

      By the way, I have a hard-on for your mom and your cat, but I'm only 1 of 2 right now. You can guess which one.

      Spank me hard, baby. And tickle my sphincter with your tongue! Your dad turned me on to that, though he practiced on your sister first.

      What gets me rock hard is Linux. Monolinux, duolinux, quadcocklinux, I take it all in all the wrong orifices.

      The best part is the AC... just who could this asshole be? Hmmm.....

    7. Re:Red Herring by zeno_2 · · Score: 1
      "Yeah, this story is the same as on MSNBC, except for the layout is less good."

      How about..

      The layout is not as good =)

    8. Re:Red Herring by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      most writer's freelance. write a good story for Red Herring, MSNBC says "hey, we want that too" and the writer thinks "ka-ching!"

    9. Re:Red Herring by rot26 · · Score: 1

      You mean "worser".

      --



      To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
    10. Re:Red Herring by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      How about, I'm not english, so I might suck sometime at grammer? :-)
      No offense taken, anyway, thanks for the tip.

    11. Re:Red Herring by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      Sorry I wasn't really trying to offend you in anyway, none taken so no biggie. And don't worry, people that have spoken english thier whole life still say that.

      When I posted the reply, I was REAL bored at work, and it caught my eye =).

      Cheers!

    12. Re:Red Herring by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      I bet you we're real bored at work again to reply to this also. So am I right now :-)))

  13. other news, Microsoft bought out the New York Times Press. Get more information at nytimes.com/acquisition.

    1. Re:In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, this site redirected me to screwmesomemore.microsoft.com

  14. Read before you whore for karma by Neil+Blender · · Score: 1

    The story is on msnbc. Not really sure where the NYT comes in.

    1. Re:Read before you whore for karma by Genghis+Troll · · Score: -1

      Are you THE Neil Blender?

  15. Who cares? by leviramsey · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Monolinux reports that Mozilla 1.0RC1 is due within a week. This is surely News for Nerds and Stuff that Matters!

    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      HOW long have I been waiting for 1.0??? An announcement that it is due in a week doesn't mean anything, I want to actually see it compile on machine before I believe it.

    2. Re:Who cares? by on+by · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Cool! That r0x0rz my s0ks0rz!!

    3. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in related news, a whole bunch of people just decided that "leet speak" was stupid about 2 years ago.

      AC'd 'cause you are a flaming idiot, and if I were you I wouldn't get your hopes up about the "sex0rs" any time soon.

      Christ on a trampoline- at least be funny if you troll, asshat.

    4. Re:Who cares? by on+by · · Score: 0

      screw you

  16. It's SHooooWTIIMMMME by Fecal+Troll+Matter · · Score: -1

    Nice FUCKING MODEL!!!!!!

    [::honk honk::]

    Beetlejuice, beetlejuice, beetlejuice....

    1. Re:It's SHooooWTIIMMMME by Penis+Bird+Guy · · Score: -1

      Excuse me, sir, have you seen my...

  17. Spelling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    indium phosphide valley?! Yuk!

  18. +1 Informative? My ass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    "Fluff factor" my ass! It's an identical copy of the same article? What, different font size or something? Get real, karma whoooooooooooooore.

  19. The shock will come when by tcd004 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's revealed that one can spy on another's computer activity by tracking the flickering light escaping from the cracks of the computer case!

    Switzerland shifts out of Neutral

    Tcd004

    1. Re:The shock will come when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, sooner or later they'll be able to spy on them, like how you can spy using the flicker on the walls from a crt (This istrue, cos it was on /.)

  20. Re:Porn Passwords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    YES YES!!! Please post pr0n passwords, get moddes up, come on.. post em.. you know you want to ;)

    PLEASE POST THEM

  21. Hewy there fellas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I cannot seem to load Jedi Outcast in lenis, fella. How for is the loading help here? Many users seem knowledgeable in the natalie portmans and the grits and the j00nix how can I play star wars my obsession on lenis penis?

    Oh, Can I not? I am needing the help here, hella. I hope the fish has tansliterated well for justivce!

  22. Photonic bandgap technology by Vireo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, they are certainly not the firsts to make photonic chips. Optical mux/demux (cascaded couplers) are routinely built as planar waveguides on semiconductor materials. However, the size of their chip seems really small, which suggests that they use photonic bandgap technology, which uses very small arrays of refraction index changes in which light at certain wavelenght can't propagate to make it perform tricks, like turning at 90 degrees on very small distance. However, I didn't saw any mention of this in the article. Anyone can confirm it is the case?

    1. Re:Photonic bandgap technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Your are missing the point.
      Of course, optical components have been out for years. But no body was able to create an optic-based IC. That is, until Infinera.

    2. Re:Photonic bandgap technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Photonic IC in InP can use low-loss curved optical waveguides with bending radius down to 30 microns. There are no commercial photonic IC's at the moment that are based on photonic bandgap technology.

      For an example of what's possible in today's InP technology have a look at these circuits from Delft University and ThreeFive photonics in the Netherlands. They show a photograph of the bare chip containing a 4-wavelength optical crossconnect on 1.5 mm by 3 mm! This is without use of photonic bandgap structures (which could in principle reduce the size even further).

  23. informative my ass. by stubear · · Score: 0, Troll

    The stories are identical except you didn't have to keep clicking "next" to read the entire article on MSNBC. Nice attempt to discredit the article because of the association between Microsoft and NBC (MSNBC). I can't believe the moderators gave this troll +1, informative.

    1. Re:informative my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe that your brain allows you to still breath. Or have you just hooked your anus up directly to your mouth, like MicroSuxor does? Are you Bill Gate's fluff boy? Does he have super-sexy tasting spewage? Or are you just Ballmer, which means you take it in all orifices?

      Christ on a purple pony- you fucking apologists for the company which produces the worst fucking software in the known universe just piss me off. It wouldn't surprise me if you were with Clinton raping that Broderick women.

      Asspony.

  24. India's Brain Drain is US's gain by raahul_da_man · · Score: 0, Troll

    Serving on the company's board are Pradeep Sindhu, founder, vice chairman, and chief technology officer of Juniper Networks; Dan Maydan, president of Applied Materials; T.J. Rodgers, president and CEO of Cypress Semiconductor; Alex Balkanski, a general partner at Benchmark; and Vinod Khosla, a general partner at Kleiner Perkins.

    I can't help wondering what they could have achieved in India, instead of coming to the US and helping make an already rich country richer.

    1. Re:India's Brain Drain is US's gain by leviramsey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The answer: nothing. India has been a country that has been "almost there" for decades.

      The real important news, though, is Mozilla 1.0RC1 is almost here!

    2. Re:India's Brain Drain is US's gain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've yet to meet an Indian tech person that is half as good as any of my co-workers.

      "What they could have achieved in India" you ask? Maybe make that hellhole a civilized country? Adopt a real religion? Stop breeding like animals? Maybe invent deoderant, or a sanitary bathroom?

      The possibilities are endless!

  25. Optical router and switches? by cyphixation · · Score: -1

    If these guys are holding the key to such things...they do indeed have the motherfuckin' Holy Grail...

    --
    odium|||nunquam|||obticesco
  26. Go ahead, mod me down your communist gnu fucks. Yk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    They might have achieved enlightment. Or cholera. Or NUCULAR WEAPONS.

    Perhaps even a spicier curry? Or a stinkier armpit? Or even a non biased opionion from an obvious sand-nigger-camel-jockey named "raahul_da_man"

    Dirty towel head terrorist fag.

  27. Cheaper, maybe, cheap? No. by bertok · · Score: 2, Informative

    Slashdot is not the only publication with bad editors! To quote the article: "Though Infinera won't reveal the chip's cost, when built with manufacturing techniques used by chip makers like Intel and Advanced Micro Devices, it likely could be made very cheaply."

    Well, not quite. You see, the article later mentions that Infinera used InP (Indium Phosphide) chips instead of silicon, probably because they needed it's superior electrical and optical properties. With InP, it's possible to make 100 GHz circuits, but not cheaply. Certainly not for the same cost as a modern, silicon CPU.

    1. Re:Cheaper, maybe, cheap? No. by duct_tape_n_wd40 · · Score: 1

      Aw nuts, a Slashdot article that I can ramble on about ad nauseum shows up (I work in a related field, none of that sissy network administration stuff for me), and I have to catch a plane this afternoon...

      Sure this sounds neat, and I'm not trying to knock anybody, but a few quick points -

      i) as others have mentioned, this is a really nice press release disguised as a magazine article. They made some devices - congratulations!

      ii) Fab - it sounds like they're doing this on bits of wafers in beakers on a wetbench, with presumably less than state-of-the-art litho. Great for proof of concept, but keep in mind that larger, better capitalized and more experienced outfits have trouble moving small-scale hero devices into assembly-line style production mode. It constantly amazes me how much compound semiconductor processing is still done by a combination of black magic and luck by a few process engineers with "golden hands".

      iii) Related note: [these things will be cheap] when built with manufacturing techniques used by chip makers like Intel - try buying modern process equipment that will handle 2" and 3" InP wafers. I dare ya. All the modern interesting tools are built to handle acres of dinner-plate sized Si wafers, and can't cope with the teeny-tiny ones (hey, the Si market is about 100x bigger, can't blame the equipment manufacturers).

      On the other hand, maybe I should take a look through Welch's publications in my ample free time...

      --
      .siggy .siggy .siggy .siggy hoi hoi hoi - Prosit!
  28. Ouch... by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    "Some of Infinera's 700 or so competitors"...

    Even if they do it, the cost competition is gonna make sure they never make any money....

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  29. At least Monolinux by leviramsey · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Doesn't forget that The New York Times and MSNBC are not the same!.

    MONOLINUX : Where the editors can actually read!
    1. Re:At least Monolinux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, lookee here, our monolinux hippy again! So nice to see you are spouting your gay love, anal intrusions again!

      I'd love to lock you up in a room with trollaxor (sp?) for an hour, just to see how mangled you'd be.

      Move on people, nothing to see here besides this assmonkey.

  30. Questions??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well suppose one day everything that is electronic today becomes optical.

    What will our test instruments look like? What will be the units of measure?
    How is work done in an optical device? Will we have 'fiber buss bars' a la Outland that carry 'DC light' everywhere?
    Will we have to break open circuits to measure things a la current probe?

    Will there be optical equivalents of everything electronic or will the optical stuff be a specialized peripheral of electronic devices?

    1. Re:Questions??? by BakaMark · · Score: 2, Informative
      What will our test instruments look like?

      At least there is one current example of this today. There are devices that are used to tap optical fibre lines, that work by actually splicing into the line.

      These devices have been around for a number of years now, and I have heard of one such device being able to tap an optical fibre bundle that has 50 individual optical fibres within it. Of course it will leave the optical pathways semi-intact, and detection is only by using complex test gear on either end that will tell you the consistency of the fibre as well as the points where the joins have been made. These things are usefull if you want to wiretap an optical fibre cable.

      Of course removing such a device from the optical fibre bundle will effectively break the connection.

    2. Re:Questions??? by benhaha · · Score: 1

      If you squeeze optical fibres the leak light, so no problem there.

      For chips, I would think you'd have to design in ports specifically for monitoring, as is done for regular chips anyway.

      --
      NO ID: BEING FREE MEANS NOT HAVING TO PROVE IT
  31. Is this really a photonic switch? by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From the description, this is a switch or router on a chip with optical in/out, but the usual transistor processing. The innovation is that the lasers and receivers are on the same chip as the switch.

    There are true optical switches (from Nortel, for example), although they're circuit switches for backbone links. An optical IP router is a ways off.

  32. Light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Couldn't this theoretically be thrown off by light nearby? Like internal LEDS for the power switch?

    1. Re:Light by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      wrong wavelength. any visible light would be of a wavelength that is way to huge to fit. besides, it will be a closed circuit, just like any electrical circuit should be.

  33. change of address by tux-sucks · · Score: 4, Funny

    Indium Phosphide Valley, anyone?

  34. Light inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I thought I was tired of changing light bulbs already...

    Darn the computer's dead... lemme check the light bulb.

  35. Recognizing space savings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the size of the device will allow companies to recogize significant space saving costs.

  36. I think I know how it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's elementary physics, really. You basically just have to tweak the harmonic resonance to the flux capacitor - and EUKEKA - photonic routing!

    1. Re:I think I know how it works by America+Uber+Alles · · Score: 0

      You basically just have to tweak the harmonic resonance to the flux capacitor

      Then all you need to do is get the machine up to 55MPH and supply 1.21 Gigawatts.

    2. Re:I think I know how it works by katcoker · · Score: 1

      Why are things so heavy in the future? Is there a problem with the earth's gravitational pull?

      --
      Max: "You mind if I drive?" Sam: "Not if you don't mind me clawing at the dash and screeching like a cheerleader."
    3. Re:I think I know how it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's 88mph, git

  37. A CLOCKWORK ORANGE Part 1 by Mao+Zedong · · Score: -1

    "What's it going to be then, eh?"
    There was me, that is Alex, and my three droogs, that is
    Pete, Georgie, and Dim. Dim being really dim, and we sat in
    the Korova Milkbar making up our rassoodocks what to do
    with the evening, a flip dark chill winter bastard though dry.
    The Korova Milkbar was a milk-plus mesto, and you may, O
    my brothers, have forgotten what these mestos were like,
    things changing so skorry these days and everybody very
    quick to forget, newspapers not being read much neither.
    Well, what they sold there was milk plus something else. They
    had no licence for selling liquor, but there was no law yet
    against prodding some of the new veshches which they used
    to put into the old moloko, so you could peet it with vel-
    locet or synthemesc or drencrom or one or two other vesh-
    ches which would give you a nice quiet horrorshow fifteen
    minutes admiring Bog And All His Holy Angels and Saints in
    your left shoe with lights bursting all over your mozg. Or you
    could peet milk with knives in it, as we used to say, and this
    would sharpen you up and make you ready for a bit of dirty
    twenty-to-one, and that was what we were peeting this even-
    ing I'm starting off the story with.
    Our pockets were full of deng, so there was no real need
    from the point of view of crasting any more pretty polly to
    tolchock some old veck in an alley and viddy him swim in his
    blood while we counted the takings and divided by four, nor
    to do the ultra-violent on some shivering starry grey-haired
    ptitsa in a shop and go smecking off with the till's guts. But, as
    they say, money isn't everything.
    The four of us were dressed in the height of fashion,
    which in those days was a pair of black very tight tights with
    the old jelly mould, as we called it, fitting on the crotch
    underneath the tights, this being to protect and also a sort of
    a design you could viddy clear enough in a certain light, so
    that I had one in the shape of a spider, Pete had a rooker (a
    hand, that is), Georgie had a very fancy one of a flower, and
    poor old Dim had a very hound-and-horny one of a clown's
    litso (face, that is). Dim not ever having much of an idea of
    things and being, beyond all shadow of a doubting thomas,
    the dimmest of we four. Then we wore waisty jackets without
    lapels but with these very big built-up shoulders ('pletchoes'
    we called them) which were a kind of a mockery of having real
    shoulders like that. Then, my brothers, we had these off-white
    cravats which looked like whipped-up kartoffel or spud with a
    sort of a design made on it with a fork. We wore our hair not
    too long and we had flip horrorshow boots for kicking.
    "What's it going to be then, eh?"
    There were three devotchkas sitting at the counter all
    together, but there were four of us malchicks and it was
    usually like one for all and all for one. These sharps were
    dressed in the heighth of fashion too, with purple and green
    and orange wigs on their gullivers, each one not costing less
    than three or four weeks of those sharps' wages, I should
    reckon, and make-up to match (rainbows round the glazzies,
    that is, and the rot painted very wide). Then they had long
    black very straight dresses, and on the groody part of them
    they had little badges of like silver with different malchicks'
    names on them - Joe and Mike and suchlike. These were sup-
    posed to be the names of the different malchicks they'd
    spatted with before they were fourteen. They kept looking
    our way and I nearly felt like saying the three of us (out of the
    corner of my rot, that is) should go off for a bit of pol and
    leave poor old Dim behind, because it would be just a matter
    of kupetting Dim a demi-litre of white but this time with a
    dollop of synthemesc in it, but that wouldn't really have been
    playing like the game. Dim was very very ugly and like his
    name, but he was a horrorshow filthy fighter and very handy
    with the boot.
    "What's it going to be then, eh?"
    The chelloveck sitting next to me, there being this long big
    plushy seat that ran round three walls, was well away with his
    glazzies glazed and sort of burbling slovos like "Aristotle
    wishy washy works outing cyclamen get forficulate smartish".
    He was in the land all right, well away, in orbit, and I knew
    what it was like, having tried it like everybody else had done,
    but at this time I'd got to thinking it was a cowardly sort of a
    veshch, O my brothers. You'd lay there after you'd drunk the
    old moloko and then you got the messel that everything all
    round you was sort of in the past. You could viddy it all right,
    all of it, very clear - tables, the stereo, the lights, the sharps
    and the malchicks - but it was like some veshch that used to
    be there but was not there not no more. And you were sort of
    hypnotized by your boot or shoe or a finger-nail as it might
    be, and at the same time you were sort of picked up by the old
    scruff and shook like you might be a cat. You got shook and
    shook till there was nothing left. You lost your name and
    your body and your self and you just didn't care, and you
    waited until your boot or finger-nail got yellow, then
    yellower and yellower all the time. Then the lights started
    cracking like atomics and the boot or finger-nail or, as it
    might be, a bit of dirt on your trouser-bottom turned into a
    big big big mesto, bigger than the whole world, and you were
    just going to get introduced to old Bog or God when it was
    all over. You came back to here and now whimpering sort of,
    with your rot all squaring up for a boohoohoo. Now that's
    very nice but very cowardly. You were not put on this earth
    just to get in touch with God. That sort of thing could sap all
    the strength and the goodness out of a chelloveck.
    "What's it going to be then, eh?"
    The stereo was on and you got the idea that the singer's
    goloss was moving from one part of the bar to another,
    flying up to the ceiling and then swooping down again and
    whizzing from wall to wall. It was Berti Laski rasping a real
    starry oldie called 'You Blister My Paint'. One of the three
    ptitsas at the counter, the one with the green wig, kept push-
    ing her belly out and pulling it in in time to what they called
    the music. I could feel the knives in the old moloko starting
    to prick, and now I was ready for a bit of twenty-to-one. So I
    yelped: "Out out out out!" like a doggie, and then I cracked
    this veck who was sitting next to me and well away and
    burbling a horrorshow crack on the ooko or earhole, but he
    didn't feel it and went on with his "Telephonic hardware and
    when the farfarculule gets rubadubdub". He'd feel it all right
    when he came to, out of the land.
    "Where out?" said Georgie.
    "Oh, just to keep walking," I said, "and viddy what turns up,
    O my little brothers."
    So we scatted out into the big winter nochy and walked
    down Marghanita Boulevard and then turned into Boothby
    Avenue, and there we found what we were pretty well looking
    for, a malenky jest to start off the evening with. There was a
    doddery starry schoolmaster type veck, glasses on and his rot
    open to the cold nochy air. He had books under his arm and a
    crappy umbrella and was coming round the corner from the
    Public Biblio, which not many lewdies used these days. You
    never really saw many of the older bourgeois type out after
    nightfall those days, what with the shortage of police and we
    fine young malchickiwicks about, and this prof type chello-
    veck was the only one walking in the whole of the street. So
    we goolied up to him, very polite, and I said: "Pardon me,
    brother."
    He looked a malenky bit poogly when he viddied the four
    of us like that, coming up so quiet and polite and smiling, but
    he said: "Yes? What is it?" in a very loud teacher-type goloss,
    as if he was trying to show us he wasn't poogly. I said:
    "I see you have books under your arm, brother. It is indeed
    a rare pleasure these days to come across somebody that still
    reads, brother."
    "Oh," he said, all shaky. "Is it? Oh, I see." And he kept look-
    ing from one to the other of we four, finding himself now like
    in the middle of a very smiling and polite square.
    "Yes," I said. "It would interest me greatly, brother, if you
    would kindly allow me to see what books those are that you
    have under your arm. I like nothing better in this world than a
    good clean book, brother."
    "Clean," he said. "Clean, eh?" And then Pete skvatted these
    three books from him and handed them round real skorry.
    Being three, we all had one each to viddy at except for Dim.
    The one I had was called 'Elementary Crystallography', so I
    opened it up and said: "Excellent, really first-class," keeping
    turning the pages. Then I said in a very shocked type goloss:
    "But what is this here? What is this filthy slovo? I blush to
    look at this word. You disappoint me, brother, you do
    really."
    "But," he tried, "but, but."
    "Now," said Georgie, "here is what I should call real dirt.
    There's one slovo beginning with an f and another with a c."
    He had a book called 'The Miracle of the Snowflake.'
    "Oh," said poor old Dim, smotting over Pete's shoulder and
    going too far, like he always did, "it says here what he done to
    her, and there's a picture and all. Why," he said, "you're
    nothing but a filthy-minded old skitebird."
    "An old man of your age, brother," I said, and I started to
    rip up the book I'd got, and the others did the same with the
    ones they had. Dim and Pete doing a tug-of-war with 'The
    Rhombohedral System'. The starry prof type began to creech:
    "But those are not mine, those are the property of the mu-
    nicipality, this is sheer wantonness and vandal work," or some
    such slovos. And he tried to sort of wrest the books back off
    of us, which was like pathetic. "You deserve to be taught a
    lesson, brother," I said, "that you do." This crystal book I had
    was very tough-bound and hard to razrez to bits, being real
    starry and made in days when things were made to last like,
    but I managed to rip the pages up and chuck them in handfuls
    of like snowflakes, though big, all over this creeching old
    veck, and then the others did the same with theirs, old Dim
    just dancing about like the clown he was. "There you are," said
    Pete. "There's the mackerel of the cornflake for you, you dirty
    reader of filth and nastiness."
    "You naughty old veck, you," I said, and then we began to
    filly about with him. Pete held his rookers and Georgie sort
    of hooked his rot wide open for him and Dim yanked out his
    false zoobies, upper and lower. He threw these down on the
    pavement and then I treated them to the old boot-crush,
    though they were hard bastards like, being made of some new
    horrorshow plastic stuff. The old veck began to make sort of
    chumbling shooms - "wuf waf wof" - so Georgie let go of
    holding his goobers apart and just let him have one in the
    toothless rot with his ringy fist, and that made the old veck
    start moaning a lot then, then out comes the blood, my
    brothers, real beautiful. So all we did then was to pull his
    outer platties off, stripping him down to his vest and long
    underpants (very starry; Dim smecked his head off near), and
    then Pete kicks him lovely in his pot, and we let him go. He
    went sort of staggering off, it not having been too hard of a
    tolchock really, going "Oh oh oh", not knowing where or
    what was what really, and we had a snigger at him and then
    riffled through his pockets, Dim dancing round with his
    crappy umbrella meanwhile, but there wasn't much in them.
    There were a few starry letters, some of them dating right
    back to 1960 with "My dearest dearest" in them and all that
    chepooka, and a keyring and a starry leaky pen. Old Dim gave
    up his umbrella dance and of course had to start reading one
    of the letters out loud, like to show the empty street he could
    read. "My darling one," he recited, in this very high type
    goloss, "I shall be thinking of you while you are away and
    hope you will remember to wrap up warm when you go out
    at night." Then he let out a very shoomny smeck - "Ho ho ho"
    - pretending to start wiping his yahma with it. "All right," I
    said. "Let it go, O my brothers." In the trousers of this starry
    veck there was only a malenky bit of cutter (money, that is) -
    not more than three gollies - so we gave all his messy little
    coin the scatter treatment, it being hen-korm to the amount
    of pretty polly we had on us already. Then we smashed the
    umbrella and razrezzed his platties and gave them to the
    blowing winds, my brothers, and then we'd finished with the
    starry teacher type veck. We hadn't done much, I know, but
    that was only like the start of the evening and I make no appy
    polly loggies to thee or thine for that. The knives in the milk
    plus were stabbing away nice and horrorshow now.
    The next thing was to do the sammy act, which was one
    way to unload some of our cutter so we'd have more of an
    incentive like for some shop-crasting, as well as it being a way
    of buying an alibi in advance, so we went into the Duke of
    New York on Amis Avenue and sure enough in the snug there
    were three or four old baboochkas peeting their black and
    suds on SA (State Aid). Now we were the very good mal-
    chicks, smiling good evensong to one and all, though these
    wrinkled old lighters started to get all shook, their veiny old
    rookers all trembling round their glasses, and making the suds
    spill on the table. "Leave us be, lads," said one of them, her
    face all mappy with being a thousand years old, "we're only
    poor old women." But we just made with the zoobies, flash
    flash flash, sat down, rang the bell, and waited for the boy to
    come. When he came, all nervous and rubbing his rookers on
    his grazzy apron, we ordered us four veterans - a veteran
    being rum and cherry brandy mixed, which was popular just
    then, some liking a dash of lime in it, that being the Canadian
    variation. Then I said to the boy:
    "Give these poor old baboochkas over there a nourishing
    something. Large Scotchmen all round and something to take
    away." And I poured my pocket of deng all over the table, and
    the other three did likewise, O my brothers. So double
    firegolds were bought in for the scared starry lighters, and
    they knew not what to do or say. One of them got out
    "Thanks, lads," but you could see they thought there was
    something dirty like coming. Anyway, they were each given a
    bottle of Yank General, cognac that is, to take away, and I
    gave money for them to be delivered each a dozen of black
    and suds that following morning, they to leave their stinking
    old cheenas' addresses at the counter. Then with the cutter
    that was left over we did purchase, my brothers, all the meat
    pies, pretzels, cheese-snacks, crisps and chocbars in that
    mesto, and those too were for the old sharps. Then we said:
    "Back in a minoota," and the old ptitsas were still saying:
    "Thanks, lads," and "God bless you, boys," and we were going
    out without one cent of cutter in our carmans.
    "Makes you feel real dobby, that does," said Pete. You could
    viddy that poor old Dim the dim didn't quite pony all that,
    but he said nothing for fear of being called gloopy and a
    domeless wonderboy. Well, we went off now round the
    corner to Attlee Avenue, and there was this sweets and cancers
    shop still open. We'd left them alone near three months now
    and the whole district had been very quiet on the whole, so
    the armed millicents or rozz patrols weren't round there
    much, being more north of the river these days. We put our
    maskies on - new jobs these were, real horrorshow, wonder-
    fully done really; they were like faces of historical per-
    sonalities (they gave you the names when you bought) and I
    had Disraeli, Pete had Elvis Presley, Georgie had Henry VIII
    and poor old Dim had a poet veck called Peebee Shelley; they
    were a real like disguise, hair and all, and they were some very
    special plastic veshch so you could roll it up when you'd done
    with it and hide it in your boot - then three of us went in.
    Pete keeping chasso without, not that there was anything to
    worry about out there. As soon as we launched on the shop
    we went for Slouse who ran it, a big portwine jelly of a veck
    who viddied at once what was coming and made straight for
    the inside where the telephone was and perhaps his well-oiled
    pooshka, complete with six dirty rounds. Dim was round that
    counter skorry as a bird, sending packets of snoutie flying and
    cracking over a big cut-out showing a sharp with all her
    zoobies going flash at the customers and her groodies near
    hanging out to advertise some new brand of cancers. What
    you could viddy then was a sort of a big ball rolling into the
    inside of the shop behind the curtain, this being old Dim and
    Slouse sort of locked in a death struggle. Then you could
    slooshy panting and snoring and kicking behind the curtain
    and veshches falling over and swearing and then glass going
    smash smash smash. Mother Slouse, the wife, was sort of
    froze behind the counter. We could tell she would creech
    murder given one chance, so I was round that counter very
    skorry and had a hold of her, and a horrorshow big lump she
    was too, all nuking of scent and with flipflop big bobbing
    groodies on her. I'd got my rooker round her rot to stop her
    belting out death and destruction to the four winds of
    heaven, but this lady doggie gave me a large foul big bite on it
    and it was me that did the creeching, and then she opened up
    beautiful with a flip yell for the millicents. Well, then she had
    to be tolchocked proper with one of the weights for the
    scales, and then a fair tap with a crowbar they had for opening
    cases, and that brought the red out like an old friend. So we
    had her down on the floor and a rip of her platties for fun and
    a gentle bit of the boot to stop her moaning. And, viddying
    her lying there with her groodies on show, I wondered should
    I or not, but that was for later on in the evening. Then we
    cleaned the till, and there was flip horrorshow takings that
    nochy, and we had a few packs of the very best top cancers
    apiece, then off we went, my brothers.
    "A real big heavy great bastard he was," Dim kept saying. I
    didn't like the look of Dim: he looked dirty and untidy, like a
    veck who'd been in a fight, which he had been, of course, but
    you should never look as though you have been. His cravat
    was like someone had trampled on it, his maskie had been
    pulled off and he had floor-dirt on his litso, so we got him in
    an alleyway and tidied him up a malenky bit, soaking our
    tashtooks in spit to cheest the dirt off. The things we did for
    old Dim. We were back in the Duke of New York very skorry
    and I reckoned by my watch we hadn't been more than ten
    minutes away. The starry old baboochkas were still there on
    the black and suds and Scotchmen we'd bought them, and we
    said: "Hallo there, girlies, what's it going to be?" They started
    on the old "Very kind, lads, God bless you, boys," and so we
    rang the collocol and brought a different waiter in this time
    and we ordered beers with rum in, being sore athirst, my
    brothers, and whatever the old ptitsas wanted. Then I said to
    the old baboochkas: "We haven't been out of here, have we?
    Been here all the time, haven't we?" They all caught on real
    skorry and said:
    "That's right, lads. Not been out of our sight, you haven't.
    God bless you, boys," drinking.
    Not that it mattered much, really. About half an hour went
    by before there was any sign of life among the millicents, and
    then it was only two very young rozzes that came in, very
    pink under their big copper's shlemmies. One said:
    "You lot know anything about the happenings at Slouse's
    shop this night?"
    "Us?" I said, innocent. "Why, what happened?"
    "Stealing and roughing. Two hospitalizations. Where've
    you lot been this evening?"
    "I don't go for that nasty tone," I said. "I don't care much
    for these nasty insinuations. A very suspicious nature all this
    betokeneth, my little brothers."
    "They've been in here all night, lads," the old sharps started
    to creech out. "God bless them, there's no better lot of boys
    living for kindness and generosity. Been here all the time they
    have. Not seen them move we haven't."
    "We're only asking," said the other young millicent. "We've
    got our job to do like anyone else." But they gave us the nasty
    warning look before they went out. As they were going out
    we handed them a bit of lip-music: brrrrzzzzrrrr. But, myself, I
    couldn't help a bit of disappointment at things as they were
    those days. Nothing to fight against really. Everything as easy
    as kiss-my-sharries. Still, the night was still very young.

    --
    old enough to set the table, old enough to pass the meat
    1. Re:A CLOCKWORK ORANGE Part 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Slashdot republishing copyrighted material... I smell lawsuit. I think I am going to anonymously mail someone about this. I bet you have MP3's too that illegal you know!

    2. Re:A CLOCKWORK ORANGE Part 1 by Mao+Zedong · · Score: -1

      Hi, thanks for writing.

      I recommend you use http://www.bsa.org/usa/report/

      OR one of the following numbers.

      Thanks!

      United Arab Emirates
      800.4828

      United Kingdom
      0800.510.510

      United States
      1.888.NO.PIRACY (toll free)
      202.872.5500

      --
      old enough to set the table, old enough to pass the meat
    3. Re:A CLOCKWORK ORANGE Part 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, thanks for writing!

      Now shut the fuck up!

  38. Batman or Spider-Man in a corporate environment? by YourMissionForToday · · Score: -1

    YourMissionForToday: Quicktime probably won't help you find love

    YourMissionForToday: I suggest becoming Spider-Man

    coed.jpg: But I'm batman

    YourMissionForToday: It might be time to transition your servers to Spider-Man. Netcraft's latest survey says that *Batman accounts for less than 1% of allservers on the internet

    coed.jpg: Batman was fighting hax0rz when spiderman was shittin yellow

    YourMissionForToday: Yes, but Spider-Man is infinitely more scalable, offers volume discounts for licensing and has new Sticky-Web(TM) software

    YourMissionForToday: http://store.sun.com/catalog/doc/BrowsePage.jhtml; $sessionid$LPKWARRPH0GHLAMTA1ESTGT5AAAACJ1K?cid=80 487 refer to this page for more info

    coed.jpg: spider-man is a hacked-together superhero. just some guy with a freak mutation. batman was built from the ground up by dedicated professionals and strong financial backing to be a quality superhero

    YourMissionForToday: I won't deny that Batman was very much ahead of his time, and if this was 1996, I'd probably be recommending him. But this is 2002, Spider-Man's working better than ever, and capturing market share from tons of low and medium end businesses everywhere

    coed.jpg: well first of all, market share is no indicator of a superhero's quality. just because there are millions of petty crimes for spider man to make right doesn't mean he's a better superhero. meanwhile, batman has better resources tailored specifically for doing his job well. he's the real superhero for mission-critical applications

    YourMissionForToday: You can't deny Spider-Man's continued profitibility year after year. He squashed Dr. Octopus and was hailed as the savior of Wall Street. Meanwhile, Batman is hacking around in his garage, trying to tweak his Batmobile hour after hour. Is that really the superhero you want to send to your clients?

    YourMissionForToday: http://www.sun.com/desktop/products/graphics/sunvi deoplus.html

    coed.jpg: are we trying to save Wall Street or the people of Gotham City? I dunno about you, but when i'm at the hands of a villain i don't want to put my life in the hands of some teenager who happens to know something about fighting crime. i want a trained professional who makes it his job to offer stable and robust crime-fighting powers.

    coed.jpg: and it's not like batman's license is as restrictive as people make it seem. in fact, spider-man's license is probably even more restrictive. he wants you to call him no matter what the crime. batman's license may not require the revelation of bruce wayne's identity, but i'm still free to make use of batman's products to meet all my needs. and personally, i don't care if bruce wayne keeps himself a secret, as long as he's the best fighter of crime

    YourMissionForToday: The truth is, Batman just isn't very scalable. He's great for low-end crimefighting such as your Joker or Riddler, but if he were to take on guys like the Shocker or Venom, you could expect hours of configuration headaches as he picks out the correct tool from his Bat-arsenal. With Spider-Man, all the tools you need are already pre-loaded

    coed.jpg: i think you're confusing "scalable" with "bloated." spider man isn't better just because he has to carry every single one of his limited and hackish tools with him everywhere he goes. Yeah, batman is a more sophisticated crimefighter, with a wide variety of specialized tools. but how often is a crime ever really a surprise? batman actually knows something about the criminal he's fighting, and he takes the time to plan out his strategy. yeah, spiderman is fine for a wide variety of small-time applications, but when it can't be done with spidey-sense, you need the console back at the bat-cave. don't blame batman if you can't figure out what you're doing before you try to fight a crime

    YourMissionForToday: Spider-Man's not overloaded with tools. For example, he only uses the Spider-Man belt signal if its appropriate for his job. In addition to the industry acclaimed Spider-Sense(TM), he also developed his own webbling fluid in house, which is provided free to all customers, regardless of volume. Can Batman make any claims like that?

    coed.jpg: come on, batman INVENTED the utility belt and just about anything you'll find on one today. that's what happens when you back a project with some private funding. Granted, it's cool that spiderman has the webbing built right in. but you can't deny batman's more modular approach. you always know batman's tools will work with one another, which can't always be said for spiderman. his web can stick to some impossible things, but not everything. but there's not much that batman can't grapple if he has the right hook.

    YourMissionForToday: Batman's glory days are long past. I mean, sure he invented the utility belt, but when has he UPDATED it? I wouldn't be surprised to find a Bat-Hourglass in there! LOL!

    coed.jpg: funny, i didn't think spiderman had a timepiece whatsoever

    YourMissionForToday: during normal operation, Spider-Man is in view of number of clocks? Why waste space when he doesn't have to

    coed.jpg: Yeah but what happens when there are no clocks? Batman's utility belt with his bat-clock comes in mighty handy. but the point here is not clocks, it's about whther you want a robust crime fighting system or a flashy newcomer that hasn't quite got all his powers sorted out yet. i mean which would you rather have, some kid that can swing from buildings with his own excretions, or the bat-copter?

    YourMissionForToday: Let's not let this degenerate into mere flaming.

  39. Straight-thru by lostchicken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For this to be any good, the signal path must be pure optics, e.g. the same photon must go all the way thru the switch, and just be routed around. That means the switch would have to understand the rays of light out my 100baseFX network, or fibrechannel bus, and deal with it in photonic form.

    This solves EMF issues, and other nasties. Electronics could be used for low speed control, and indicators, but fibre be used for ALL high speed stuff, including PCB traces and everything else.

    Anybody developed optical solder yet... ;-)

    --
    -twb
  40. If you keep clicking next enough times, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you'll find that the Red Herring story continues on after the MSNBC article stops.

    1. Re:If you keep clicking next enough times, by stubear · · Score: 2

      I think you'll find you're wrong. Open both side by side and scroll through the MSNBC article. You'll find they have the exact same sections which are exactly the same length and both end on the "Absolutely Fab" section. The ONLY difference I found in content was in the subtitle. The Red Herring article contained a semicolon followed by a qualitative comment about everything prior. The MSNBC article only contained the subtitle leading up to but not including the semicolon and qualitative comment.

  41. How much does that material cost in comparison.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with silicon, and can the same fabrication plants acutally work on both materials?

  42. Good Business Plan by nackrm · · Score: 0

    They continue to look for additional ways to make optical communications even cheaper through applications of their integrated photonic circuit.

    ___
    Wow, Infinera seems to be on to something here. It is a company based solely on making a product, making it better, then trying again to make things work better. I wonder what Micro$oft would have to say if they heard of this idea.

    "Do you remember how we won the Second World War?
    We cracked their codes and we never let them know."
    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp--Dr. Robert Thibodeau

    --

    Be a man! View at -1
    acm.cs.uwec.edu
  43. Where's the beef? by apk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I read the article -- verbatim -- in Red Herring's printed rag. There's no meat to that article. What exactly is it that this thumb-sized chip does, and how/where will this device be used (to reduce cost, or increase functionality, or increase circuit density per rack, or...) in the optical systems being deployed by the optical carriers?

    Does this chip offer SONET layer switching (or muxing/demuxing)? SONET layer Performance Monitoring? Does it bring anything to the DWDM playing field, in either the long-haul or metro arenas?

    Optical carriers buy optical transmission and switching systems, not components, with accompanying network management platforms to operate, integrate, and manage it.

    I ask again, where's the beef? As it is, this is just a glorified press release.

    Andy

    1. Re:Where's the beef? by ckedge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Absolutely.

      This article is the equivalent of Bell Labs EXECUTIVES and CEO's claiming that they were in the process of single handedly pulling the transistor out of their a**es, before the transistor had even been created yet.

      It ignores the 20-30 years of physics and engineering physics that came before it, it ignores the thousands of people and hundreds of groups who have been working at the dozens of different approaches to this EXACT problem, and it ignores the engineers who actually came up with the designs for the devices they are intending to use, and the related background between all of these.

      I should know. I spent four years doing a degree on one possible approach to creating the exact components they claim they are working on. I worked with InGaAs/InGaAsP/InP Quantum Well structures and one possible method of creating a fundamental process to modify such a structure into the types of devices they are thinking about. We were thinking ahead to the exact thing that they are thinking of.

      And we ourselves were basing our work on 10-15 years of other people's work. The first people who came up with the possibility of using non-silicon semiconductors was 3+ decades ago, and of creating fully integrated InP/etc based all optical ciruits is about 20-30 years old.

    2. Re:Where's the beef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Bitter much? If there's a fault it's with the reporters, not Infinera, and it's a simple matter of not bothering to state the obvious. It'd be different if they were *actively* claiming to've invented this from the ground up, but they're not. Get over it, and get over yourself.

    3. Re:Where's the beef? by cornjones · · Score: 1

      this may be nitpicky but when you say "we ourselves were basing our work on 10-15 years of other people's work" I think of two things.
      1. DUH!!!
      2. You are basing it on a lot more than 10-15 years of work. as the simplest example, did you come up w/ the mathematics that you were using. no? oh thanks newton, that calculus sure did help (to say nothing of the fancy things we have built on top of it). what about feynman and QED? not that I know about your work specifically but any scientific observation really owes itself to the last 4000 years (thanks euclid, aristotle, etc) of human scientific development.

  44. Beer Chips? Old News by Tokerat · · Score: 2, Informative
    Yes but when will they have microchips than can control the flow of beer?

    ...This one keeps the flow going pretty steadily. :-D

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  45. skip it... by doooras · · Score: 2

    what we need are isolinear chips and optronic relays

    maybe throw in a few bioneural gelpacks

    1. Re:skip it... by cybercomm · · Score: 1

      LOL... i always wondered what a mixture od Star Trek TNG+Voyager would be like...though i presume gelpacks would be considerably faster than the IC chips =D

      Oh well those things are far far away into the future, but there is one thing that isnt (or at least the article claims it is not) and that ia a hilodeck... /me starts planning holo-emmiter infrastructure....

      --
      Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
  46. That begs the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does he rate an imposter?

  47. Re:Makes you wonder theWhy.com by theWhy · · Score: 1

    it will become reliable with time. IC industry folks need to keep all options open.

  48. zero REST mass, in theory, and YMMV by StandardDeviant · · Score: 2

    But while the current theory holds that mass is invariant, the particle's _energy_ (which, when you think about it, is what you're worried about anyway) is most certainly not invariant. Since these little fellows are zipping along at a literally astronomic clip, even the "massless" photon has energy. IIRC, experiemental data held the mass of a photon as being something like 3.9x10^-(12?15?) that of the already quite svelte electron...
    Electric fields generate magnetic fields, and both can in theory interfere with the propagation of electromagnetic waves, which are the other side of the photon coin (really, at that level, what is a wave? what is a particle? they're two ways of looking at the same thing. actually this is valid all size levels, but the wave/particle duality effects for anything larger than an angel's behind is vanishing, incredibly, stunningly small)
    Besides, I was under the impression that quantum tunneling was the origin of some of the migration patterns in (or should I say through?) circuits. The lighter a particle is, the more prone it is to this "now I'm here, FOOLED YA! now I'm there" behavior... I'm too lazy to go dig up my pchem text, i'm sure somebody will follow up with a more precise explanation and some of the relevant equations. (I'm not a particle physicist, just a chemist, but we do rub elbows occasionally, much like every now and again a molecular biologist will talk to the chemists next door ;-))
    This is not to say this isn't a cool advance. It's just that I'm even more curious now as to how they got the magic chip to work, given what I imagine the physical and technical hurdles were...

    1. Re:zero REST mass, in theory, and YMMV by rainwalker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah, glad to see a fellow P Chem student here! I have my book handy, and so I figured I'd make a stab at posting that more precise explanation you asked for.

      Tunneling has to do with the energy of the particle. In the one-dimensional particle in the box theory, the transmission coefficient T is given by an equation that I cannot reproduce due to the ascii art issues, but is a roughly second-order polynomial curve when plotted as T versus E/V0, where E is the energy of the particle and V0 is the "height" of the potential barrier, moving from T=0 at E/V0=0 to T=~1 at E/V0=~2. This would mean that the higher energy of the particle, the higher of a potential barrier needed to prevent tunneling. Now, free electrons have higher energy than photons, so it would be harder to contain them, as it were. Plus, this isn't the only issue. Photons have no charge, and so are undisturbed by electrical and magnetic fields, but electrons of course are negatively charged, which complicates things in 2 main ways, first they do not travel in a straight line (like photons), and having 2 narrowly separated regions with different charges (such as in a transistor) will lower the potential barrier. I believe this is why SOI (silicon-on-insulator) is useful, as it makes it more difficult for the electrons to migrate from region to region.

      I hope this helps some, and if I am wrong, feel free to correct me!

  49. Storyline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who can't remember this movie here is a short summary:
    Adam Maitland (Alec Baldwin) and Barbara Maitland (Geena Davis) drown as a result of a car accident. They come back as ghosts and must haunt their old house. They are dismayed when they find out that the artsy fartsy Deitz family and their gothic daughter are now living in the Maitlands' home. The Maitlands hire looney ghost Beetlejuice (Michael Keaton), to rid the Deitz family from their house, but he has other plans. I won't spoil the plot, but this movie is a must see classic. The movie has an original feel, excellent soundtrack, and is absolutely hilarious. Definatly Michael Keaton's best work. Still waiting for a sequel....

  50. There is some T&M stuff by TalShiar00 · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of test and measurement equipment available for the optical market. Look around Agilent's T&M lightwave page.

  51. Anybody developed optical solder yet... by TalShiar00 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately no. But that woudl be cool to breadboard a optical circut. Unfortunately we have to resort to special cutting and polishing tools just to connect a few components together.

    How to piss a optical network admin off: go to the long haul switch and yank a few wires out, they will be there for hours redoing all the lines.

  52. Not about Si vs. InP!! (Re:Makes you wonder) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Sigh*...

    This InP technology is not going to be replacing Si anytime soon. Si is wonderful and there's still quite a bit more we can squeeze out of it before we've reached the limits of such technology. This company is using InP because like many III-V semiconductor compounds, it has good optical properties.

    If the original poster had taken the time to actually read the thing, maybe he would have realized that this is an important step forward in terms of optical switching and networks. This device performs one or more of the functions necessary for this type of work (there are 5 of 'em if I read the article right). Silicon is no good in this regard since it's an indirect gap semiconductor.

  53. Buckets o' beer by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    > Yes but when will they have microchips than can control the flow of beer?

    I don't know about that, but AI thought experiments include a device that mimics a human brain made via buckets of water, poured. I suppose buckets of beer could work just as well keeping the brain moving along at a steady clip.

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  54. SSSCA workaround? by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hrm, If the SSSCA passes as is, it will dissallow "electonic digital" devices from being used without copy protection. But it dosn't say anything about optical digital devices :P

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  55. Re:How much does that material cost in comparison. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With silicone, can the same fabrication plants actually reproduce Pamela Anderson?

  56. Star Trek: Voyager is dying by Voyager+Sucks+Ass · · Score: -1

    Star Trek: Voyager is dying.

    Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered Star Trek: Voyager community when last month Nielsen confirmed that Star Trek: Voyager accounts for less than a fraction of 1 percent of all viewers. Coming on the heels of the latest Netcraft survey which plainly states that Star Trek: Voyager has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Star Trek: Voyager future. The hand writing is on the wall: Star Trek: Voyager faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Star Trek: Voyager because Star Trek: Voyager is dying. Things are looking very bad for Star Trek: Voyager. As many of us are already aware, Star Trek: Voyager continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood. Tuvok is the most endangered of them all.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    Star Trek: Voyager producer Rick Berman states that there are 7000 viewers of Star Trek: Voyager. How many fans of Tuvok are there? Let's see. The number of Star Trek: Voyager versus Chakotay-specific posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 Tuvok fans. Tuvok posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of Chakotay-specific posts. Therefore there are about 700 Tuvok fans. A recent article put Seven of Nine at about 80 percent of the Star Trek: Voyager fanbase. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 Seven of Nine fans. This is consistent with the number of Seven of Nine Usenet posts. Due to the troubles of Paramount, abysmal ratings and so on, Star Trek: Voyager was ended as a series and the syndication rights were sold to another troubled company. Now that company is also dead, its corpse turned over to another charnel house. All major surveys show that Star Trek: Voyager has steadily declined in the ratings. Star Trek: Voyager is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Star Trek: Voyager is to survive at all it will be among hardcore Star Trek nerd fucks who are hoping to see Seven of Nine in a bikini. Star Trek: Voyager continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time.

    Star Trek: Voyager is dying.

    1. Re:Star Trek: Voyager is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What really cracks me up about this is that the Voyager Sucks Ass troll didn't even bother to write a new troll for it. He just uses the BSD is Dying troll post with a few words changed around.

      He at least could have changed Netcraft to NBC or somthing. Or whatever channel STV is on.

      Funny in it's own way though. These kind of trolls are one of the reasons I view at -1. Just watch out for the goatse. LOL.

  57. Competitors Abound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What these guys are doing is hardly unique. Take a look at Luxtera.

  58. point here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hot grits, linux, freebsd, M$, conspiracy theory, the shrub, beowolf cluster, and ___ post.

    I'm a troll and proud of it mod me -4

  59. can this chip calculate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can you process with this chip? or is it only good for switching and stuff.