Ok, the article is fine, informative and well shaped, needless to say that openbsd does it's work really well as a firewall.
But why the hell do we have 80% troll posts? This sucks... really.
Oh yeah, mod me down now, but you know i'm right...
-- Life sucks.
Re:My experiences with Windows XP Professional
by
sirket
·
· Score: 2
Why are you wasting Quad Xeon processors on an OpenBSD box? OpenBSD has always had poor dual processor support, and the performance boost drops even further when you go to 4 processors.
Are you sure these boxes weren't running FreeBSD?
-sirket
Re:My experiences with Windows XP Professional
by
Tuzanor
·
· Score: 3, Informative
um, actually OpenBSD doesn't have ANY SMP support. So if you add more procs it'll only use one.
OpenBSD as more then a firewall
by
Partisan01
·
· Score: 1
I am a OpenBSD fan, but I think that it doesn't get as much stage time for things other then a firewall. I use OpenBSD to run a webserver for my company, and an LDAP server. Granted I'm not running a high profile server, but it still gets the job done nicely, plus it's very secure. OpenBSD is a great firewall, but it also excells in many other aspects of serving...
-- ahh, the egg in the basket..
Re:OpenBSD as more then a firewall
by
artymiak
·
· Score: 1
Don't worry, there will be more OpenBSD coverage on ONLamp.com.
--
Jacek Artymiak
freelance consultant and writer
master of many a page
Take a look at emBSD at 32 meg it's small and secure (OS is on flash memory). Most inportantly it does one job, routing and firewall duties, and it does it well. http://embsd.suspicious.org/
is broken... please try again.
If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.
Ok, the article is fine, informative and well shaped, needless to say that openbsd does it's work really well as a firewall.
... really.
...
But why the hell do we have 80% troll posts? This sucks
Oh yeah, mod me down now, but you know i'm right
Life sucks.
Why are you wasting Quad Xeon processors on an OpenBSD box? OpenBSD has always had poor dual processor support, and the performance boost drops even further when you go to 4 processors.
Are you sure these boxes weren't running FreeBSD?
-sirket
um, actually OpenBSD doesn't have ANY SMP support. So if you add more procs it'll only use one.
I am a OpenBSD fan, but I think that it doesn't get as much stage time for things other then a firewall. I use OpenBSD to run a webserver for my company, and an LDAP server. Granted I'm not running a high profile server, but it still gets the job done nicely, plus it's very secure. OpenBSD is a great firewall, but it also excells in many other aspects of serving...
ahh, the egg in the basket..
Take a look at emBSD at 32 meg it's small and secure (OS is on flash memory). Most inportantly it does one job, routing and firewall duties, and it does it well. http://embsd.suspicious.org/