Slashdot Mirror


Id Software and Activision Wolfenstein Source

An enthusiastic Anonymous Coward writes: "Id Software and Activision released the sources of Return to Castle Wolfenstein. Single-player and multiplayer included. Unbelievable! Another great surprise from Id Software!" Update: 04/14 15:19 GMT by T : Note: don't get your hopes up -- these are the sources for the game code, not the engine.

11 of 146 comments (clear)

  1. first post by keshto · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    this post generated by a bunch of sleepy old guys

  2. The troll slap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I found this code on slashcode as an evil ploy to install linux on trolls computers

    // The trollslap, Written by Jon Katzes penis
    // Not released under the General Pissing Licence (GPL)
    // Written in Slashcode

    var trolls=memberswhohavekarma

    Slashcod is easy to understand, because they use their own language.

    More news on this scandal!

  3. The Trollslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I found this code on slashcode as an evil ploy to install linux on trolls computers

    // The trollslap, Written by Jon Katzes penis

    // Not released under the General Pissing Licence (GPL)

    // Written in Slashcode

    var trolls=memberswhohavekarmalessthan0

    If troll

    mail trolladdress subject Hey you attach linuxinstaller.exe

    P0st prolinux article on slashdot

    moderate atrandom() 200 comments -1

    Slashcod is easy to understand, because they use their own language.

    More news on this scandal!

  4. WHAT!!!! by Niksie3 · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    wow
    unbelievable
    w000t
    crap this is cool... man... wow... /me is speechless

    GO CARMACK!!!

    Now you can mod me down

    Ps: to all those people who are complaining about cheaters, get a live.

    --
    Sig you!
  5. No, U R Stoopid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    and you are obviously a troller, and not a very good one at that.

    btw, you're a member of mensa like i am the Atlantic ocean.

  6. Re:We are lucky, by Rhinobird · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Actually, I put the blame for Columbine on the drugs those 2 were taking...intereesting article on the subject here.

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  7. Re:Low Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Once again, the stuff Timothy posts is almost always inaccurate, out of date, totally wrong, or all of the above.

    Don't expect any less than the best!

  8. Re:Here ya go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Thank you very much for providing this. I was wondering how I could get my hands on a Win* box to unzip it, now I don't need to.

    Thanks, you saved me a lot of trouble!

  9. Re:Here ya go. THANK YOU!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Thanks!!! I use Macintosh only and no windows emulator. The game already runs on the mac, but I really was hoping to get the source of the game to look at and YOU helped me! Thank you !!!!

  10. Re:Here ya go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    cool thank you very much!

  11. Re:Low Quality by Thing+1 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    In its current state, I am very glad I'm not paying a cent for /. access. Stuff like this posting really brings down the average content quality big time.

    At the point I am posting this, your post currently has 5 replies. Mine is #6.

    My belief is that such "mistakes" have historically garnered a lot more activity. Hence it is in Slashdot's best interest to continue making "mistakes" in order to keep activity high. The more posts per article, the theory goes, the more eyeballs viewed the ad(s) at the top, so they can charge more.

    It's always about the money. And I agree -- the mistakes are easily catchable (duplicate postings), juvenile (witness 4/1/02), and irritating (the headline for this article is just ambiguous enough to make you want to read the damn thing).

    The worst part? Slashdot is addictive; although they're not getting money directly from me in the form of a subscription, they are getting money from me indirectly in the form of page views, which cost the advertisers more; and posts, which probably cost the advertisers more than a page view. So even though I'll most likely never subscribe, my activity is still helping make them money. And if it educates/entertains me in the meantime, well, that's cool.

    My point? Don't worry about it. If the quality has gone that far downhill, we'd start seeing .sig lines hawking alternative news discussion sites at the same frequency as we're seeing the "Great Slashdot Blackout" coming up the week of April 21(ish). But Slashdot is Heroinware ; there's plenty of us junkies keeping stats up.

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.