Slashdot Mirror


Mixing Gigabit, Copper, and Linux

iampgray writes: "With copper-based gigabit cards selling for less than $36 these days, what kind of performance can you expect -- especially in the often-overlooked Linux market? We sought out to test exactly what you could expect from copper-based gigabit solutoins for the desktop interface through the cluster-targeted products. Name brands and off-brands were put through the wringer. How'd they fare? Interesting results to say the least."

13 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. Mool by Cryptopotamus · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Jabvek! Clostobba. Yoy mool.

    --


    Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
  2. Fist pr0st! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Oh yes...

  3. fp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    fp?

  4. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    first post fucktards. AC's rule

  5. FP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    FP!

  6. we're talking about Gigabyte/8 == Gigabit [nt] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    subject says it all

  7. Re:./ed already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    gigabit

  8. Do Not Click Link!!! by jhunsake · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    goatse.cx mirror

  9. Re:Transfer speeds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Yeah, but imagine 100 people doing 10 Mbps over a backbone, dumbass.

  10. again! another story with INTERESTING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    is this some kind of fucking conspiracy?

  11. Re:I have the way out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    NONONO! Its not the MHz or the GigaFlops! Its the BogoMips that matter!

  12. Re:Text of Article (fourth section) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    not if I have anything to do with it. bwahahaha!

  13. Linux is slower than FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I've tested some of these same cards, in particular, the Intel and SysKonnect cards, at
    900+ Mbits/sec with 1500 MTU, but this is on
    FreeBSD. :-)