Tell the story. It all depends on what you claim is unprovoked.
Suppose you're walking down the sidewalk and a group of drunks are coming towards you. You keep you're posture and walk through them. They decide you "dissed" them, and beat the shit out of you. Are they wrong? Yes. Are you right? Sure. Was it unprovoked? No. You should have gotten out of their way.
Just because you behave in a legal or proper or whatever manner doesn't mean you can't provoke someone.
I've seen many times where someone claimed they weren't at fault. Sure, they're innocent, but they could have avoided the situation. I have no sympathy for them when they chose not to.
I don't know about the UK, but in the US if you are under the influence and you get in a fight with someone, in most cases the other person won't get prosecuted. Drunks and drug-users get in fights all the time. In most cases, they just get charged with being drunk. In fact, I've seen several cases where the cops pit the two parties against each other to get them both to drop charges. In their mind, you're both waste-oids and they don't give a shit.
It's an inferior attempt at authentication. Yahoo!'s DomainKeys is superior in every respect.
I was really interested in SPF for a while, but I'm tired of this shit. Like the grandparent says, it's all a big waste of time. I'm going to delete those TXT records right now...
Hunters are not opposed to the Endangered Species Act. Hunters and fishermen appreciate government regulations that provide them with more animals to catch or kill. Check out Ducks Unlimited, for example. The biggest opponents of the ESA are developers and polluters. Both of these groups are very friendly to the GOP when it comes to fundraising.
Of all that you posted, this is the only one I disagree with:
p. 2 #18: "We oppose the Endangered Species Act."
That's enough to kill my vote for Bush. It's also enough to kill my vote for Kerry. (For those of you who haven't been paying attention, BOTH Bush and Kerry are pro-hunters/sportsmen.)
It's a sad day when one's only choice is to vote "no confidence", and even that has to be a write-in.
That's missing the point. If I have a C/C++ routine taking two pointer dummy arguments of the same type, then there is no way of guaranteeing that the pointers won't be aliased
Sure there is. C99 specifies __restrict__ and __restrict for just this case.
You simply do not know what you are talking about. The keyword "restrict" in C99 makes a recommendation or statement, if you will, to the compiler that it can safely perform an optimization because there isn't pointer aliasing in the function call. It does not *guarantee* that that is the case. It simply makes a recommendation, which could be wrong.
When did I say anything about "technique" or "device"? It's quite obvious to me, the other guy, and everyone modding this discussion that you had no clue what "pointer aliasing" even was.
It never fails when some troll has nowhere to go
Hmm, who is more likely the troll? 743925? or 81920? The fact is, I simply called you on your statement and made you look stupid. Now that makes me a troll?
You don't use pointer aliasing, it's a concept. Pointer aliasing does occur quite commonly by the way, evidenced merely by the existance of memmove() and memcpy().
Here's pointer aliasing that most people wouldn't even recognize:
void swap (int* a, int* b) {
int temp = *a;
*a = *b;
*b = temp; }
int v[40];
swap(&v[20],&v[21]);
You make me worry
No, you make me worry. Especially after the HUNDEREDS of applications you've written. You can't even spell "hundreds" correctly for Christ's sake.
I'll give you 2^64, but really you should have 2^0 - 2^32 all memorized.
calculus classes (stuff involving integrals, derivatives, matrices, equations with multiple unknown variables, etc), and I believe it will come in handy in physics and mathematical statistics
What does that have to do with a Master's program in IT? That's stuff that you should have taken as an undergrad.
Whining that the taxman is keeping you from going to college is baloney.
That's not what he's whining about, and I think that's obvious. You're using his comment to start an argument of your own.
He was dissatisfied that no one was there to help him go to college, yet he now has to pay for many others to do so. He's right, it isn't fair, and he has a right to complain.
Actually from what I understand it is those profit numbers that actually made the FCC se mi forcegoogle to IPO in the first place. Apparently there are regulations concerning how much a private company can earn.... shrugs.
Then you understand nothing. There is no such regulations, there never have been, and there most likely never will be. Some of the largest companies in the world are privately owned.
No longer will I assume that George was skipping National Guard duty in Texas rather than slogging through the jungles of Vietnam because of his family connections. It was probably just the luck of the draw.
Actually, he was a fighter pilot. They weren't sent "slogging through the jungles of Vietnam" regardless of who their family was.
Slashdot Mirror
what's the reason?
or just tell the whole story, and we'll find a reason for you.
of course, as other posters have pointed out, it's no surprise you got your ass kicked, your annoying as all hell.
Tell the story. It all depends on what you claim is unprovoked.
Suppose you're walking down the sidewalk and a group of drunks are coming towards you. You keep you're posture and walk through them. They decide you "dissed" them, and beat the shit out of you. Are they wrong? Yes. Are you right? Sure. Was it unprovoked? No. You should have gotten out of their way.
Just because you behave in a legal or proper or whatever manner doesn't mean you can't provoke someone.
I've seen many times where someone claimed they weren't at fault. Sure, they're innocent, but they could have avoided the situation. I have no sympathy for them when they chose not to.
I don't know about the UK, but in the US if you are under the influence and you get in a fight with someone, in most cases the other person won't get prosecuted. Drunks and drug-users get in fights all the time. In most cases, they just get charged with being drunk. In fact, I've seen several cases where the cops pit the two parties against each other to get them both to drop charges. In their mind, you're both waste-oids and they don't give a shit.
killing other humans which is a sin
Or so you believe.
we do have a right to kill them
Or so you believe.
Unprovoked; they were drunk, I was drunk.
Unprovoked my ass.
So anyways...
a tion c ation
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=imperson
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=authenti
It's an inferior attempt at authentication. Yahoo!'s DomainKeys is superior in every respect.
I was really interested in SPF for a while, but I'm tired of this shit. Like the grandparent says, it's all a big waste of time. I'm going to delete those TXT records right now...
Humans are machines.
In fact, the whitetail deer population in the U.S. is out of control
According to humans or natural trends?
and without the hunting season, you actually have a greater chance of being killed because you struck a deer while driving.
That's the deer's fault? Animals weren't put here so we could shoot them when they interfered with our driving habits.
Hunters are not opposed to the Endangered Species Act. Hunters and fishermen appreciate government regulations that provide them with more animals to catch or kill. Check out Ducks Unlimited, for example. The biggest opponents of the ESA are developers and polluters. Both of these groups are very friendly to the GOP when it comes to fundraising.
Things are a lot more complicated than they seem.
Of all that you posted, this is the only one I disagree with:
p. 2 #18: "We oppose the Endangered Species Act."
That's enough to kill my vote for Bush. It's also enough to kill my vote for Kerry. (For those of you who haven't been paying attention, BOTH Bush and Kerry are pro-hunters/sportsmen.)
It's a sad day when one's only choice is to vote "no confidence", and even that has to be a write-in.
Then you should call the board governing telecommunications in your state, because they most likely just broke a law (statuatory or administrative).
That's missing the point. If I have a C/C++ routine taking two pointer dummy arguments of the same type, then there is no way of guaranteeing that the pointers won't be aliased
P ointers.html for more details.
Sure there is. C99 specifies __restrict__ and __restrict for just this case.
You simply do not know what you are talking about. The keyword "restrict" in C99 makes a recommendation or statement, if you will, to the compiler that it can safely perform an optimization because there isn't pointer aliasing in the function call. It does not *guarantee* that that is the case. It simply makes a recommendation, which could be wrong.
See http://www.cbau.freeserve.co.uk/Compiler/Restrict
When did I say anything about "technique" or "device"? It's quite obvious to me, the other guy, and everyone modding this discussion that you had no clue what "pointer aliasing" even was.
It never fails when some troll has nowhere to go
Hmm, who is more likely the troll? 743925? or 81920? The fact is, I simply called you on your statement and made you look stupid. Now that makes me a troll?
You don't use pointer aliasing, it's a concept. Pointer aliasing does occur quite commonly by the way, evidenced merely by the existance of memmove() and memcpy().
Here's pointer aliasing that most people wouldn't even recognize: You make me worry
No, you make me worry. Especially after the HUNDEREDS of applications you've written. You can't even spell "hundreds" correctly for Christ's sake.
I can't quite be bothered to do (1024/8*256) in my head, or need to find out what 2^64 is, quickly
You're a Master's student? To think that I thought the quality of education in SE was good.
Here's a clue:
2^10 = 1024
2^3 = 8
2^8 = 256
1024/8 = 2^(10-3) = 2^7 = 128
128*256 = 2^(7+8) = 2^15 = 32768
1024/8*256 = 2^(10-3+8) = 2^15 = 32768
I'll give you 2^64, but really you should have 2^0 - 2^32 all memorized.
calculus classes (stuff involving integrals, derivatives, matrices, equations with multiple unknown variables, etc), and I believe it will come in handy in physics and mathematical statistics
What does that have to do with a Master's program in IT? That's stuff that you should have taken as an undergrad.
Whining that the taxman is keeping you from going to college is baloney.
That's not what he's whining about, and I think that's obvious. You're using his comment to start an argument of your own.
He was dissatisfied that no one was there to help him go to college, yet he now has to pay for many others to do so. He's right, it isn't fair, and he has a right to complain.
What makes you think I'm a computer geek? How do you know I didn't study business law for several years?
Those have nothing to do with how much money you make. They have to do with how widely the interest in your company distributed.
Actually from what I understand it is those profit numbers that actually made the FCC se mi forcegoogle to IPO in the first place. Apparently there are regulations concerning how much a private company can earn.... shrugs.
Then you understand nothing. There is no such regulations, there never have been, and there most likely never will be. Some of the largest companies in the world are privately owned.
Unless they got shot down...
He was a jet fighter pilot. We didn't have too many jet fighter planes in Vietnam. He wouldn't have been there regardless. Get over it.
No longer will I assume that George was skipping National Guard duty in Texas rather than slogging through the jungles of Vietnam because of his family connections. It was probably just the luck of the draw.
Actually, he was a fighter pilot. They weren't sent "slogging through the jungles of Vietnam" regardless of who their family was.
Too bad that's not a real website, I was about to make a donation. Assuming you loan me her for a day...
Having your firewall bogged down by rules just to ignore some dialup user that'll probably have switched IPs the next day
Actually, most of the machines attacking me recently have been compromised static-ip servers at various hosting providers.
Better yet, block everything and whitelist your shit.