Slashdot Mirror


Review of Hancom Linux 2.01 Standard

ELQ writes: "The Korean-based Hancom Linux announced that the professional version of Hancom Office Suite 2.0 is canned, but the standard version has just been released, four days ago. It seems to be a capable alternative to Star Office, for a very reasonable price. It includes a word processor, a spreadsheet, a presentation app and a rasterized painting app. OSNews has the review."

4 of 81 comments (clear)

  1. Girl Scouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The Girl Scouts announced today that they will start to sell Linux CD-ROMs in addition to the traditional cookies. A spokesman for the organization said, "Cookie sales are slumping and the cookie manufacturers are constantly nagging us for a larger share of the profits. Demand for Linux, on the other hand, is increasing. Plus, we can acquire Linux CDs for almost nothing. Fund raising will never be the same again."

    Starting next month, Girl Scouts will begin door-to-door sales, asking residents, "Would you like an operating system that doesn't crash? It's only $5, or $30 if you buy a book to go with it." With the increasing dissatisfaction with Windows and the increasing awareness of Linux and open source software, the Girl Scouts expect sales to be strong.

    Other organizations are eyeing Linux as a possible fundraising venture. One PBS station in California is giving away complementary Linux CDs to all viewers who send in donations. Donations to the station have tripled over the last month, prompting the station manager to announce, "Finally! We can now afford to show decent programming for a change! Thank you, Linus Torvalds."

    In a related story, one breakfast cereal maker is offering free Linux CDs in selected boxes. A spokesman said, "A few months ago we inked a deal with Microsoft to provide free Internet Explorer 6 CDs in our boxes. In short, consumer reaction to the IE offer was horrible. Sales actually dropped. We've cancelled that promotion and are now offering free Linux CDs in selected boxes (i.e. the ones that are more expensive). Initial reaction has been very strong. In the future we may offer a new cereal under the 'Tux the Penguin' brand."

  2. Lunix Bad for your Health! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    You may be surprised to learn that the software you use affects your health. A group of medical researchers in the Midwest have discovered proof that the effect of using quality, reliable software on human health is undeniable.

    An unbiased medical study was recently completed which included blood tests, double-blind placebo-controlled user tests, heart monitors and urine samples, among other techniques. The study was led by Dr. Robert Wilkes and his assistant Dr. Li Huang, both of whom have a strong background in computer software. The details have not yet been made available to the public, however Drs. Wilkes and Huang have asked that the public be provided with a summary of their findings as soon as possible.

    This study was conducted over a period of two years, and the results will be published shortly in a major medical journal. The subjects for the study were 235 computer users and programmers, of varying skill levels, selected at random from major cities in the U.S., and carefully monitored on a periodic basis for software-related stress, illness, injury and other ailments. They also performed psychological evaluations to determine the effect of various software brands on the users' mental health.

    Below is a brief summary of the results of their findings.

    Users of Microsoft Windows, Office and Internet Explorer have a significantly lower incidence of stomach ulcers, colonic gas, redness of the eyes, and stress-related high blood pressure than their Unix & Linux counterparts -- particularly the users of Solarus, Red Hat, NOME, KDE and Netscape, among others. It was believed that the ocular redness was related to the high percentage of marijuana abusers in the Linux community, and urinalysis confirmed this to be the case. Further study and psychoanalysis showed that the stress and ulceration (found in the Unix & Linux users) were primarily caused by the following factors:

    1. Uncertainty about the future of their operating system.
    2. The perceived need to "fight the system", or a sort of internal struggle against large corporations (such as Microsoft).
    3. The necessity of posturing oneself as "reet" in order to gain the respect of colleagues. (These users failed to inform Dr. Wilkes as to the meaning of this obscure term. If anyone here can provide a definition, that would be appreciated.)
    4. Feelings of fear or paranoia concerning illegal hacking, cracking and "where's" smuggling activities. (Such feelings were quite widespread among this group, and tend to also cause the flatus which was mentioned earlier.)

    The Unix & Linux users also had a greater incidence of carpal-tunnel syndrome, due to the greater necessity of typing at the command line. Examination of the wrist muscles in this group of users found numerous cases of inflammation and irreparable injury caused by their incessant command-line usage, whereas the majority of Microsoft users, who primarily use the mouse and seldom type, had healthy wrist muscles.

    The Microsoft users exhibited tranquility, good mental and physical health, and balanced emotional well-being. They tend to spend more time at the gym, visit family and friends more often, and are more outgoing and social. Dr. Huang found that this is due to the fact that their operating system doesn't require them to spend long hours studying Mann pages in order to perform simple maintenance tasks. Their primary reasons for feeling secure were as follows:

    1. Their choice of software is friendly and colorful, plays interesting sounds when they start up, shut down, or click on certain pictures, and Microsoft provides plenty of hotfixes such as Windows Update to keep their computer safe from hackers.
    2. They feel secure about the future of Microsoft, partly because its founder is the richest man on the planet. As one user noted, "Bill Gates is one smart cookie. He knows how to make computers easy for people like me. I trust him with the future of my computer, because he always comes up with nifty ways to make computers fun. Plus he's darn rich, so they won't be going bankrupt anytime soon! LOL!"
    3. User enjoyed the catchphrase "Where do you want to go today?" because it made them feel as though Microsoft were catering to their wishes and needs, which does in fact appear to be true.

    Among the focus groups examined were numerous programmers, of various software persuasions. The programmers using Visual Basic, ASP and .NET technologies were the healthiest overall, and Dr. Wilkes found that this was directly related to the security they felt in their careers. The .NET programmers were especially well-adjusted, partly due to their sense of pride and being on the cutting edge of technology. "Microsoft is the biggest game in town," one engineer raved, "and those who miss the .NET bandwagon are getting left by the wayside. Nobody in the industry has produced a virtual-machine-based, object-oriented language like Microsoft's C# until now."

    The Unix & Linux programmers using Java, J2EE, JSP and PHP were found to have the lowest health ratings. Upon further analysis, it was determined that this was due to the following primary factors:

    1. Lack of drag-and-drop interfaces which automatically generate source code. In comparison to the Microsoft-based developers, this group spent a lot of extra time writing code from scratch. This led to less time spent with family and friends, which led to ulcers, gastrointestinal disorders and high levels of stress.
    2. A feeling of being "left behind" or "out of the loop" with regard to Microsoft's revolutionary new technologies in the .NET family of products. These users have an unwritten "anarchic" rule that they will not install Microsoft's products on their PCs, thus they often wonder what new, exciting features they are missing. Some develop psychological complexes based on their high levels of curiosity.
    3. Uneasiness about being involved in illegal hacking activities, or in many cases, the need to be perceived as "reet" among peers.

    Keep in mind that this study was performed without prejudice, and with the strictest adherence to the guidelines set forth by the profession for clinical trials of this nature. Dr. Wilkes and his colleagues are educated professionals of the highest degree, and their vast research in medicine and the field of computer software allows them to speak with authority on these issues.

    Please take this opportunity to reevaluate your choice of software, and be aware that it can drastically affect your physical and mental health.

  3. More news from Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Karl Marx and Frederick Engels

    MANIFESTO
    OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY

    1848

    A spectre is haunting Europe -- the spectre of communism. All the
    powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this
    spectre: Pope and Tsar, Metternich and Guizot, French Radicals and
    German police-spies.

    Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as
    communistic by its opponents in power? Where is the opposition that has
    not hurled back the branding reproach of communism, against the more
    advanced opposition parties, as well as against its reactionary
    adversaries?

    Two things result from this fact:

    I. Communism is already acknowledged by all European powers to be
    itself a power.

    II. It is high time that Communists should openly, in the face of the
    whole world, publish their views, their aims, their tendencies,
    and meet this nursery tale of the spectre of communism with a
    manifesto of the party itself.

    To this end, Communists of various nationalities have assembled in
    London and sketched the following manifesto, to be published in the
    English, French, German, Italian, Flemish and Danish languages.

    I -- BOURGEOIS AND PROLETARIANS [1]

    The history of all hitherto existing society [2] is the history of class
    struggles.

    Freeman and slave, patrician and plebian, lord and serf, guild-master
    [3] and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in
    constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now
    hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a
    revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin
    of the contending classes.

    In the earlier epochs of history, we find almost everywhere a
    complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold
    gradation of social rank. In ancient Rome we have patricians, knights,
    plebians, slaves; in the Middle Ages, feudal lords, vassals,
    guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices, serfs; in almost all of these
    classes, again, subordinate gradations.

    The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal
    society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but
    established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of
    struggle in place of the old ones.

    Our epoch, the epoch of the bourgeoisie, possesses, however, this
    distinct feature: it has simplified class antagonisms. Society as a
    whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into
    two great classes directly facing each other -- bourgeoisie and
    proletariat.

    From the serfs of the Middle Ages sprang the chartered burghers of the
    earliest towns. From these burgesses the first elements of the
    bourgeoisie were developed.

    The discovery of America, the rounding of the Cape, opened up fresh
    ground for the rising bourgeoisie. The East-Indian and Chinese markets,
    the colonisation of America, trade with the colonies, the increase in
    the means of exchange and in commodities generally, gave to commerce, to
    navigation, to industry, an impulse never before known, and thereby, to
    the revolutionary element in the tottering feudal society, a rapid
    development.

    The feudal system of industry, in which industrial production was
    monopolized by closed guilds, now no longer suffices for the growing
    wants of the new markets. The manufacturing system took its place. The
    guild-masters were pushed aside by the manufacturing middle class;
    division of labor between the different corporate guilds vanished in the
    face of division of labor in each single workshop.

    Meantime, the markets kept ever growing, the demand ever rising. Even
    manufacturers no longer sufficed. Thereupon, steam and machinery
    revolutionized industrial production. The place of manufacture was
    taken by the giant, MODERN INDUSTRY; the place of the industrial middle
    class by industrial millionaires, the leaders of the whole industrial
    armies, the modern bourgeois.

    Modern industry has established the world market, for which the
    discovery of America paved the way. This market has given an immense
    development to commerce, to navigation, to communication by land. This
    development has, in turn, reacted on the extension of industry; and in
    proportion as industry, commerce, navigation, railways extended, in the
    same proportion the bourgeoisie developed, increased its capital, and
    pushed into the background every class handed down from the Middle Ages.

    We see, therefore, how the modern bourgeoisie is itself the product of a
    long course of development, of a series of revolutions in the modes of
    production and of exchange.

  4. WAFFLES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hi there. Today, I want to talk about a subject near and dear to all of our hearts.

    WAFFLES.

    There are many types of waffles. Some are belgian, some are fruity, some come from Waffle House and taste like baked shit. Some have sugar in them, but it's rumored that this is a European Communist Plot to make everybody fat. Some are "Eggos", which you are supposed to "Leggo". Some are cheap and generic, others cost upwards of a thousand dollars for a single helping. There are those you eat plain, and others go better with toppings, such as powdered sugar and Maple Syrup.

    My favorite type of waffle is Belgian with fruit and stuff on top. Now that's a fucking good waffle. But there are other options... in fact, there's something for everyone!

    Yes, waffles. A timeless American tradition.

    WA-WA-WA-WAFFLES, EAT ONE TODAY!

    This has been a presentation of the National Waffle Council.