Web Services

It's Like Most Bandwagons... by telstar · 2002-04-23 05:11 · Score: 4, Insightful

Those that lead have the most to gain, and those that follow stand to lose the most if they don't jump on board...
The success or failure of the actual concept is secondary to how soon they joined the party.

Becuase of Stupidity of course by Telastyn · 2002-04-23 05:15 · Score: 4, Interesting

It's becoming more and more common that the "Internet" is just Internet Explorer to most people. So some smart fellow thinks it'd be a grand idea if services could be served this way, to appease the lowest common denominator. PHB's get ahold of it, and wham! off it goes to the media, and in 2-3 years everyone (hopefully) realises what a bad idea it was.

If you want a unified 'client' for all services, make one, don't kludge everything onto http. Please...

Re:Becuase of Stupidity of course by smagoun · 2002-04-23 05:27 · Score: 5, Insightful

OTOH, HTTP is pervasive. So are HTTP clients. It's the "write once, run anywhere" model that Sun's been pushing with Java for so many years. You run the app in one place (on your server), and it's accessible to anyone with a computer and a modem. It even works on PDAs, phones, etc with a minimum of effort. I'll be the first to agree that HTTP isn't the best way of doing things for most apps, but the industry has never been about "best". It's about "good enough" and market penetration.

Designing your own protocol takes time, and implementing it for each OS/hardware combo out there takes even more time. Why bother to do that, when you can leverage a protocol (HTTP) and client software (browsers) that are already everywhere?

From management's point of view, web services are a no-brainer....
Re:Becuase of Stupidity of course by ethereal · 2002-04-23 05:42 · Score: 5, Insightful

So, you think you know security, but anything that's tunneled through HTTP/HTTPS is OK with you? You really don't understand security.
SOAP et al are a mistaken implementation for exactly that reason, in a typical Microsoft fashion: by running everything over HTTP, we can get things working quickly without wondering whether they are secure. Later on, there will be a ton of SOAP security holes and information leaks, but we won't be able to plug the hole properly since we can't cut off HTTP without strangling our businesses. I love innovation without cogitation.
An absolute godsend to good firewall administrators would be to have specific services on specific ports so that you could easily audit the use of such services separately and have a better handle on what's going in and out of your 'net. You could, for example, inspect SOAP packets for a particular service without having to slow down all traffic through your HTTP proxy. But since you're a lazy bastard, I bet you don't care :)

--
Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

How could they not be? by FurryFeet · 2002-04-23 05:15 · Score: 5, Insightful

In today's world, connectivity is key. You pick up a phone and expect to be able to call any other phone on earth (granted, it may be expensive or hard, but it is possible), no matter if it's in another country, company, if it's a celular or a satelite phone.
That expectation moves to the Net. If you're going to hire net services, you expect to have a unified system that will allow you to do anything with one interfase, one bill, from anywhere.
Now, I can only see two posibilities for that to happen. One is Microsoft, but fortunately I see a trend where less companies are willing to empower the BMFH (Bastard Monopoly From Hell). The other is open standards.
And yes, this is a Good Thing (TM).

Nobody knew what CORBA was for until the web by mmacdona86 · 2002-04-23 05:37 · Score: 5, Insightful

Not companies routinely make information available to the Internet, and routinely make use of information that other companies provide. Unfortunately, lots of times this is more difficult than necessary since all the information is formatted in pretty web pages for people to see.

Web services just means that you are providing the same data in a format for other companies' programs to use. This is an excellent idea, particularly when you can charge for providing the data.

This was always the idea behind CORBA, but I think people didn't get it because since both ends of the communication were to be programs, it was too abstract. Now that people do these kinds of information exchanges everyday with web servers and browsers, it's much clearer what the point was all along.

Web services takes the CORBA idea and adds the web momentum. You leverage the communication infrastructure built for the web. SOAP is a hell of a lot less efficient than IIOP, though.

CORBA is too heavy & EJB is too RMI/IIOP depen by sleight · 2002-04-23 05:40 · Score: 5, Insightful

Before I begin, I want to make clear that I'm an XML skeptic. To me, XML is nothing more than formatted text -- utterly devoid of value until two or more parties agree on a shared vocabulary (in the form of a DTD or Schema).

To be simple, CORBA is too entirely too complex. Until recently, even Orbix's (the lead vendor of the pack) offerings have been extremely "flexible" with their degree of compliance to the CORBA spec; Orbix 2.x had CORBA 1.x and 2.x features side by side without any clear delineation of which feature was compliant with which spec.

EJB is respectable if you're a CORBA or RMI shop.

Now, let's be realistic. HTTP is already there. It works. Sure, it's not stateful but, historically, people have been kluging statefulness in using cookies for years. XML isn't necessarily ideal but, if you want to be programming language indepent then you have to choose some sort of format. Why not formatted plain text? Sure, it's a little wasteful on the bandwidth but it's flexable.

To the above mix, we just add UDDI in place of a JNDI or CosNaming and away you go.

Sounds nice in principle but I have yet to see it in practice. ;)

Shameless Self-Promotion by cybermage · 2002-04-23 05:52 · Score: 5, Interesting

Hey Erik, nice ad: Organization: Joshua Branch Erik Sliman 1449 Larchmont Ave., Dn Lakewood, OH 44107 US Phone: 216 228-7361 Email: erik(at)joshuabranch.org Registrar Name: Register.com Registrar Whois: whois.register.com Registrar Homepage: http://www.register.com Domain Name: OPENSTANDARDS.NET Created on: Fri, Dec 17, 1999 Expires on: Sun, Dec 17, 2006 Record last updated on: Wed, Mar 06, 2002 Administrative Contact: Joshua Branch Erik Sliman 1449 Larchmont Ave., Dn Lakewood, OH 44107 US Phone: 216 228-7361 Email: erik(at)joshuabranch.org Technical Contact, Zone Contact: Register.Com Domain Registrar 575 8th Avenue - 11th Floor New York, NY 10018 US Phone: 902-749-2701 Fax: 902-749-5429 Email: domain-registrar(at)register.com Domain servers in listed order: DNS13.REGISTER.COM 209.67.50.208 DNS14.REGISTER.COM 209.67.50.209

--
Some people have a way with words, and some people, um, thingy.

Re:Marketing Hype = More $$$ by rylos · 2002-04-23 05:54 · Score: 4, Interesting

I agree that the hype is heavy for Web Services. However, I do see benefits for using Web Services.

Making Web Services work in a useful way sometimes takes some creativity. Take Google as an example. With the recent release of the Google API, I was able to use PHP and SOAP to access their search results. One of the methods offered through the service is spell checking. By integrating this spell checking with my company's internal search engine, I now have the ability to make search term suggestions to users. This functionality would be very difficult to provide if it had to be created from scratch.

Web Services will NOT work for all things and in all situations, but they WILL work for some things and in some situations. Creativity is the key.

It WILL happen by Ars-Fartsica · 2002-04-23 06:01 · Score: 4, Insightful

The web will at some point be home to more metadata than html. The web at some point will traffic more bots and agents than documents.

Its silly to presume the web will remain only as a document archive with rudimentary data exchange facilities.

This is the first step to really exposing APIs over the network in a truly heterogenous fashion. It will take time, there will be major failures, and there will be a lot of hype, but it will happen.

Re:Web Services is Hype by Ars-Fartsica · 2002-04-23 06:04 · Score: 4, Insightful

It doesn't offer anything new that couldn't be done with rpc.

No one is claiming that it isn't rpc, but it is an agreed-upon open standard for rpc across public networks using simple transport protocols. No one else is doing this, and CORBA is web services so don't offer that up as a reply.

11 of 222 comments (clear)