Slashdot Mirror
Cosmic Rays from Old Quasars?
frankske writes "The mystery of the galactic cosmic rays has been solved, according to NASA... From the article: "The American space agency (Nasa) scientists think these fragments of matter come from "retired" quasars, galaxies containing supermassive black holes that once shone with astonishing brilliance. ""
Don't they know that the true power behind cosmic rays is The Power Cosmic, and hence Galactus, The Immortal Destroyer of Worlds? But in the end it doesn't really matter; I'm sure that if Galactus were here, he'd remind us that he is beyond the cares of fleeting mortals.
It hurts when I pee.
Although the oscillating neutrinos did catch me off guard.
Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
Michael says frankse says the BBC says NASA scientists think "these fragments of matter come from "retired" quasars, galaxies containing supermassive black holes that once shone with astonishing brilliance."
ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
Can't they be a bit more specific? Are they talking about gamma radiation? They shouldn't use such general terms, otherwise I might confuse this with the messages from Krang that keep getting trapped in my skull. (I'm assuming they aren't referring to some intergalactic dude named "Ray".)
Believe nothing -- Buddha
However, how does this help us except that we know a little bit more? How can we use this to our advantage to improve our lives, etc?
Right now, it doesn't help except we hopefully know a bit more. That's the thing with basic science, generally any one discovery doesn't in itself help anything or anyone. But such things come together with other basic and 'useless' things and produce something useful. And until then, nobody knows which bits are the important ones.
I don't subscribe to RMS's GNUtopian vision.
I saw this Here yesterday it seems like an interesting theory.. it gives a whole new point of view to blackholes.
Just Limin' Mon
Amen. If you can't appreciate the value of such a discovery in pure science, then there's no need to complain about it. I'm sure there's plenty of people like me out there who find discoveries like these, no matter how trivial they may seem, to be one more step towards answering the most fundamental questions about our universe. Far from irrelevant.
To the person who started this thread, and others who would ask the same question, I think we should try to think of it from the point of view of those responsible for the discoveries before we comment on their validity or usefulness. I mean, someone worked on this for a long time, in addition to spending years learning the fundamentals of their particular field. They don't need people who are for the most part ignorant of the details and implications to tell them whether their discoveries are useful or not.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
There's some pretty cool stuff going on in the Mad Science scene. Also, check out Old Science. Like some of Pythagoras' original theorems, before he sold out. Pseudo Science also has some good stuff. Cold Fusion is one of my favorites.
If you don't like Big Science, try supporting your local scientists. Go to their shows, and buy a thesis.
Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.