Attack of the Clones: Less Plastic Crap, More Story?
Newsweek has an article in which George Lucas states that there were parts of Episode One that were damaging to the Star Wars franchise. (shocker, I know) "The last movie did not live up to expectations." They'll cut the merchandise by two thirds, as they still have tons of unsold Episode One merchandise. Yahoo is also running an AOTC story. Mild spoilers in the linked stories, by the way.
I think this Lucas quote says it best:
"There's only one issue for a filmmaker," he says. "Will this make its money back so I can make the next one?"
From a Time Magazine article.
Only the dead have seen the end of war.
That's Senator Jar-Jar Binks, at least according to IMDB and other sources.
Only the dead have seen the end of war.
The current edition of Maxim has a pretty cool interview with George Lucas that covers a couple pages. Not too many spilers, and it also covers the general direction Lucas is taking it in (as a director and as a story). Some of us might find some cool stuff to look at in the magazine as well...
If you really must know....
p lot.html
MAJOR SPOILERS!!
http://www.aaronmccray.com/entertainment/episode2
python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
I really enjoyed this story on time.com but didn't feel like dealing with submitting it and having it summarily rejected.
Nonperiodic Central Trajectory
another quote from the same interview: Fans are very opinionated, and that's good. But I can't make a movie for fans
keep it simple.
Uhmm... is he saying the movie itself didn't live up to expectations or the toy sales didn't. This quote seems to be out of context...
=rq
However, when writing "Return of the Jedi", it was becoming clear that he could really finish up everything in episode six and there wouldn't be any need for episodes 7-9. (He originally planned for the death of the Emperor and redemption of Annakin Skywalker in episode 9.)
If I recall correctly, it was this drastic change in plans that led to the dispute between George Lucas and Gary Kurtz, and why Gary Kurtz didn't stick around for episode 6. I'm not sure if this is a rumor, or fact.
But after Jedi, I don't think there were any plans for any episodes 7-9.
If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
>> Also, if it follows the basic trend from the first 3, The first one is more light hearted, introducing characters. The second one is dark, and deepens the plot. The third one will release the darkness, but show the light at the end of the tunnel. *shrug* <<
/. article was about a comment by Lucas, not the movie itself...
Actually, Lucas has said it will be a bit different, analogous, but different. If I remember correctly, before Ep I even came out, Lucas said that Ep I would be more like Return of the Jedi, Ep II would be more like A New Hope, and Ep III would be the darkest, which would hold the fall of Anakin into the Vader persona, just as Empire was the darkest of the original three. It does seem to be following that pattern, and btw, all these posters need to actually READ the article before posting...the
yeah.
Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
One thing I really like is that, according to the Time article (and written SW publications?) the Empire doesn't come and attack the Republic. The Empire IS the Republic.
As an American trudging through 2002 I seriously like the idea that Lucas is using the mass media to put forth THIS idea for people to think about: that the well intentioned Republic can turn into the Empire through expansion, greed and expediency.
And here I thought he was just translating the history of the Roman Republic/Empire into space opera... considering that the politics in TPM look just like late Roman Republic politics, and that they've got the exact same corruption and abuses that led to the fall of the Roman Republic. Unfortunately, I don't think Palpatine is going to be a Julius Caesar... more like a Tiberius or Diocletian.
---dragoness