Slashdot Mirror


SETI@Home Close to Half-Billionth Result

Jonathan writes: "SETI@Home, the largest distributed computing project in the world, is on the verge of receiving its 500 millionth result. This is a major milestone for both the project and distributed computing as a whole. Oh, and if you still need some added incentive to get involved, there's a $500 reward for the user who returns the milestone result."

10 of 312 comments (clear)

  1. Better hurry... by tg_schlacht · · Score: 4, Informative

    By my calculations based on Seti's stats from the last 24 hours the 500 millionth result will be reached in 3.67 days.

    1. Re:Better hurry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      One week? Have you even tried running the client? I've been running the Windows non-commandline client on a PIII 667 w/128 megs RAM (rather powerful, but not anywhere close to a supercomputer) for the last two years, so let's see...From my account info on Seti@home's site-

      "Average CPU Time per work unit 15 hr 06 min 03.9 sec"

      Even on the 200 Mhz w/64 megs RAM I used to run it on, it never took more than a day or two to finish a unit, and that was running only as the screensaver, with only 18-19 hours running per day, and with the early version of the client.

      Please get informed before you post complete rubbish.

  2. great article about distributed computing by emir · · Score: 2, Informative

    if you want to learn more about distributed computing there is great article that describes various types of distributed computing and how distributed computing works.

    --
    -- http://electronicintifada.net --
  3. command line seti@home by mrscorpio · · Score: 3, Informative

    Everyone who wants to get packets done fast should run this version. I upgraded from a 400mhz PII/128MB RAM/Voodoo Banshee 16mb/Win 98 to Athlon XP 1700+/256MB RAM/Geforce 2 MX 400 64 MB/Win 2k and saw no significant improvement. I tried the command line version and cut time per packet down by 83%.

    Maybe you won't see as much improvement as me, but you'll definitely see some, I guarantee.

    Chris

  4. Re:sweet, but what next? by Fweeky · · Score: 3, Informative

    > what next?

    Well, assuming we run out of data to process and methods to process it (yeah, right), or you get bored, or decide it's pointless, there are plenty of other projects to go to.

    Folding@Home and Genome@Home are two related projects with open results and which will probably have client source available sometime.

    Check a list of distributed projects. There's plenty of choice.

  5. Join "Team Slashdot" by smagruder · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm posting this to ensure that everyone here is aware that there's a "Team Slashdot" group on SETI@home. Click here to see the latest team results. This team is actually not far away from reaching the one-millionth result.

    By the way, I'm ranked #174. Kewl. :)

    --
    Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
  6. Re:It *is* worth it by skilef · · Score: 3, Informative

    Although Alien Life is by far the most fascinating subject, I think there are better ways of enhancing your CPU's nobility. Folding@home and Genome@home are not as user-friendly as Seti@home, but the derived information will be much more applicable, both to mankind and the researchers who publish the article. By the way, I'm not a standford student/employee.. :)

    --

    You do not exist. Go away.
  7. Re:Quite a bargain... by __aasfhc1949 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you do not want to be disturbed while reading Slashdot (or if you are at work), please don't click on the previous link to girlsgonewild.mpeg.

  8. Re:My spare cycles go to the GIMPS by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Informative

    Where's the fun in that? We already know those prime numbers exist!

    i think the point of the search is that some 2^x-1 are prime, and some are not... and because of the mathematics involved, it is relatively easily to factor them, and to also find some really huge primes in the process...

    the deeper question of why the heck we should look for them are more philosophical... some concrete reasons? there are cryptological applications, i think, and mathematical implications, most definitely... but mostly, it's just kewl, you know? why do anything in life? why go to the south pole? why go to mars? why get out of bed in the morning!

    here's a good list of detailed reasons:
    Tradition!
    For the by-products of the quest
    People collect rare and beautiful items
    For the glory!
    To test the hardware
    To learn more about their distribution

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  9. There is something you're missing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "...the peak performance is 40TFLOPS (executing performance is over 5TFLOPS)..."

    It's not so easy to get that machine to it's top performance.