Doom III Officially Announced
Jacek Fedorynski writes "The end is near. First, id Software's site is updated for the first time since the Quake II times and now they officially announce Doom III!" If you recall, there were some screenshots released last year, but I don't think there's been much since then - these are probably out of date.
and you no it! hehehehe ain't i funne? PSYCH!
fp..
hope this isnt a press release about layoffs at Id.
four-oh-four
Nice troll. But not the best I've seen.
I don't even know where to begin. Only someone who didn't understand anything about compilers and the hinderance that unnecessary abstraction creates would make the statment that C++ is better for programming games. C++ is fine for applications that don't squeeze the last drop of performance out of a system because memory usage and overhead are considered acceptable trade-offs. But for real programming the only way to go is hand optimized C and assembly. C++ just makes programs EASIER to write, it doesn't generate superior code by any stretch of the imagination.
Lee
Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
Here
So if what I think is funny is not funny someone with mod points, no one else ever gets to see it?
Poorly concealed goatse link above. Don't people have anything better to do?
Netcraft officially confirms: *BSD is dying
Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered *BSD community when recently IDC confirmed that *BSD accounts for less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of the latest Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as further exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood. FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.
Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.
All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and *BSD's long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS hobbyist dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.
Fact: *BSD is dying
Damn funny. Pity my Sword of Moderation is at the smithy for sharpening right now...
-- Don't call me "Sir," I increase entropy for a living!
Oops. Brain fart. I meant Blitz++.
because it's racist, sexist, offensive, and crappily done. and the plots repeat themselves. and it's overly expensive and sucks. the animation quality makes hanna-barbera look luxurious.
Free Fernando Poo!
It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
It should be noted that it wasn't McDonald's fault for spilling the coffee, but rather serving coffee too customers that was so hot that it was capable of giving 3rd degree burns.
ie: It was undrinkable. Therefore the product was faulty. The faulty product caused severe burns when a non faulty product would have given minor burns. I don't see why people still don't understand this ruling.
Yes
is your wife's name Lola, by chance?