Headhunting Laws?
Headhunting Headhunters asks: "I was wondering if anyone knew what the laws surrounding third-party, recruiters and headhunters are? As with a lot of tech workers now looking for a job, I've submitted my resume to a bunch or headhunters with the explicit understanding that they will not represent me to a company without my approval. I also have my resume on my personal website (with a watermark denoting copyright on it and forbidding distribution). I was waiting for a written offer from a company which I had applied to directly on my own. After an interview with the techs, they were sure they wanted me, but the HR department suddenly put a stop to the process a week later, claiming that I had been previously represented by a third party firm -- call them 'X Solutions, Inc.'; I had never given 'X Solutions, Inc' my resume, to my knowledge, nor had I ever talked to them by phone or e-mail. I certainly never gave them permission to represent me at this one company, and now I was out of luck: this company's policy was that they couldn't accept my resume since it had come through a third party before."
"So now I need to get a lawyer and have them write a 'Cease-and-desist', because God only knows how many other companies 'X Solutions, Inc.' spammed with my resume. What are my rights, and what are the rights that recruiters can rely on? What are the laws, or experiences, you've all dealt with? Now that the market has declined so rapidly, I imagine there are a lot of recruiters out there who'll do anything for a nibble... but this just isn't right."
I regret every signing up with a headhunter.
First off is the spam you start getting, the others are the annoying phone calls and other crap you have to do, like "we expect your resumes in this format, our clients expect this level of quality, blah blah blah..."
I've been employed for almost a year, and I'm still getting garbage all the time from them.
The "technical ones" are the worst. I swear, if some 'expert' headhunter asks me to give him examples of the Java programs I've written, I'm gonna shoot them. (There is no mention of Java on my resume, but there is Javascript - anyone else get this all the time? So to avoid confusion, I changed the reference to ECMAscript, which of course was even worse, because then I had to explain that in every interview).
The same with monster and alot of those job boards, they all turn into headhunter spam networks. No thanks. This might sound lame, but I'd rather network the old fasioned way or post on a forum on a tech site for a job than bother with these people.
I'm missing something here... Why would the HR department prevent you from getting hired just because your resume was submitted previously? What's the difference? If they're that uptight about getting resumes "properly", is that really a place that you want to work for?
- Bill
I think it's something to do with exclusivity. Headhunting agencies send out Resumes with the intent that the company then hires the prospective employee THROUGH the agency. Thus giving the agency a nice bonus, as they claim a 'finding fee'
If a company approaches the prospect directly, then they don't have to pay the agency anything. If the agency has sent the resume previously, they can sue the company for leaving them out of the loop.
"Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
My first reaction is that you should just explain to the HR department what you just explained to us. That you have no legally binding agreement with anyone else. If this company really wants you they should be reasonable about it. Get 'X Solutions, Inc.' to 'show you the agreement' you signed.
:-)
My second reaction is that there is something else going on and that this 'third party resume' stuff if just a smokescreen for something else. Maybe they did an informal background check on you and found the wrong person... or maybe they did did an informal background check and found the right person. Remember that conviction for fraud you had a few years ago.
I believe this would come under copyright law. You may be able to sue the company for breaching your copyright. You may have to prove date and ownership of copyright and you need to say on the CV that it was copyrighted to you.
If you lived in UK/europe, you could use their Data Protection laws.
HR is worried because someone might have agreed to pay a fee if you are hired.
But I wonder how far back "previously" goes?
If it means "ever in recorded history", they could run out of experienced applicants, in an area with an active recruiter community and a small group of large employers.
I know that's probably not what the person asking the question wants, but how about just contacting this X Solutions headhunting agency and trying to work things out with them? I mean, if the job looks promising, and the employer simply wants to avoid getting sued by this agency, contacting the headhunter may resolve the issue.
..) come into the company through the headhunting firm. I know that's a bad solution because they had no right to represent you in the first place, but if the company is willing to pay their fee, and still wants to hire you, things would work out. The anger over getting used would go away in a little bit, but the good job would hopefully stay.
Either just threaten the headhunting firm a little, and have them call the employer or promise not to sue (or sign something), or worse (and I'm sure you don't want this but
I'm surprised he didn't mention the firm by name in the letter. Writing anonymously would protect the submitter of the question, but now all of us looking for work in the future may wonder if we're dealing with the same bad agency and don't even know it.
Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
back in 1999, 2 recruiting agencies had my resume when I moved out to the bay area. they each had different contacts/jobs, and I figured that they wouldn't send my resume anywhere without my knowing it, seeing how I asked/warned/screamed that wish to them almost everyday. but it still made no difference. I was told by a potential employer that I had been represented by 2 recruiters, and that they would no longer consider me a candidate, although I was basically overqualified (it was for a sysadmin position). I was told that the HR dept didn't want to get into a pissing contest between the recruiters, arguing who got my resume there first, who had consent to send it, etc.
I think this happens all the time, and all I could do was scream at the top of my lungs and threaten the recruiter who sent it without my knowledge.
First off, lets start out with the famous IANAL.
That being said, it seems that you have lost a potential job due to 'X Solutions, Inc' falsely and (I would assume) illegally representing you as their client. I say, find a nice bloodthirsty lawyer to sic on them. You might get some financial compensation, and maybe your lawsuit would prevent this from happening again.
Just my $.02
They were trying to make a buck off of you. By giving them your resume before you got to it, if you do get hired, they can claim a signifigant chunk of money as a finders fee...
Well, since your resume is copyrighted, and they are trying to make money (albiet indirectly) from a copyrighted work, get your lawyer to whip out the BIG guns... copyright infringment.
"Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
You may be able to collect some damages from X Solutions.
Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.