GCC 3.1 Released
gergnz writes "Just popped into my inbox, GCC 3.1 released. There are many bug fixes over 3.0. "we focused more on quality than new features" Mark Michell. Here are the changes, and you can see a list of ftp servers here. This is the release I have been waiting for. I will now upgrade :-) Well Done to all involved!"
will it be available in Cygwin...
How did you get to be +1 Informative with a troll of this kind? GCC's code generator has improved in leaps and bounds recently. It may not generate the fastest code on all platforms, but it generates reliable code that is good enough. If you really are interested in performance, a little bit of profiling and clever coding goes a long way.
I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
[Well, I won't dwell on my rejected submission for this.]
But my attempt to build gcc 3.1 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 gave me this problem:
../../gcc-3.1/gcc/p rint-rtl.c -o print-rtl.o
../../gcc-3.1/gcc/print-rtl.c:30:
../../gcc-3.1/gcc/tree.h:3183: stray '\273' in program
../../gcc-3.1/gcc/tree.h:3183: stray '\224' in program
../../gcc-3.1/gcc/tree.h:3183: stray '\315' in program
../../gcc-3.1/gcc/tree.h:3183: stray '\352' in program
../../gcc-3.1/gcc/tree.h:3183: stray '\274' in program
../../gcc-3.1/gcc/tree.h:3183: parse error before '&' token
../../gcc-3.1/gcc/tree.h:3183: stray '\246' in program
../../gcc-3.1/gcc/tree.h:3183: stray '\21' in program
.
.
.
echo timestamp > s-check
stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/
-B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/bin/ -c
-DIN_GCC -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -pedantic
-Wno-long-long -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -I. -I. -I../../gcc-3.1/gcc
-I../../gcc-3.1/gcc/. -I../../gcc-3.1/gcc/config
-I../../gcc-3.1/gcc/../include
In file included from
[This went on for some while.]
Any ideas?
"Provided by the management for your protection."
I remember being optimistic about 3.0 only to be disapointed that it wouldn't compile kde.
Does it implement export yet?
I doubt it.
/..sig file not found - permission denied.
And if -O2 is not enough, well, that's what gprof and inline assembly is for. GCC's inline assembly feature is unmatched by any compiler I've ever seen (though Borland's register pseudovariable feature comes in handy if used carefully).
Ooh, moderator points! Five more idjits go to Minus One Hell!
Delendae sunt RIAA, MPAA et Windoze
Can code generated by this version of GCC use, say, registers AH and AL at the same time? I don't think GCC 2.x can do this.