Slashdot Mirror


Coasters to Face G-Force Limits?

jonerik writes "NBC News is reporting that today New Jersey will begin examining the possibility of placing limits on roller coaster G-forces. Pointing out that the G-forces on coasters are considerably greater than even those experienced by astronauts and race car drivers, legislators on both the state and national levels want to start reining in coaster G-forces which have been blamed for a number of injuries and deaths over the past few years. Pansies. Why do they think people ride roller coasters to begin with?"

10 of 568 comments (clear)

  1. tilt-a-check by quannump · · Score: 2, Funny

    from the but-is-the-tilt-a-whirl-is-still-safe dept.

    "... but the question still remains. Is our children learning"?

    --

  2. Disney Isn't Worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Disney isn't worried about regulations on their parks' coasters--they already own a senator.

  3. Re:Great... by neuroticia · · Score: 3, Funny

    If that argument worked, do you think that marajuana, heroin, meth, e, etc. etc. etc. would be illegal?

    The government's job is to attempt to preserve the lives of those who are willing to risk them.

    And those who are willing to risk them have the job of coming up with new un-regulated ways of risking them.

    Speeds along the process of innovation, and adds some interesting entries to the Darwin Awards timeline.

    -Sara

  4. Re:Why? Well... by JungleBoy · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...if you think about it, the astronauts are safer.

    Except that astronauts are sitting on top of a Big Controled Bomb[tm]. The shuttle SRBs are one of the largest controlled explosions ever engineered.

    But I'd still Ride 'em if they offered me a seat. :)

    Have Fun
    The JungleBoy
    --
    "You never know when some crazed rodent with cold feet might be running loose in your pants."
    -Calvin
  5. Re:57 known cases by abolith · · Score: 2, Funny

    yes he is fucking god damned serious. I know I *WAS* fined $1000 for that bullshit. oh did I forget to mention that kids were getting ON the bus not off? but the judge didn't see it that way I mean holy shit look out! some kid might be getting home from school at 7:00 A FUCKING M in the morning!

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
  6. Re:There really is cause for concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Roller coasters do not generate "gravitational fields." They generate no gravity whatsoever.

    So roller coasters are massles ? Damn. That's cool. We can just build a roller coaster to low earth orbit, instead of trying to figure out how to build that giant beanstalk with the elevator.

  7. Newton called to account by Bazzargh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Trenton, N.J. - A New Jersey judge today declared that it would be illegal to expose citizens to gravitational fields greater than 0.2 G . "Every year more people are falling or jumping to their deaths," explained Justice Iverson, " a situation that cannot be allowed to continue. Every day on television I see coyotes cruelly crushed by falling anvils, and its time something was done. I am issuing an extradition writ for a Mr Isaac Newton who I believe is responsible for the problem."

    Cynics have suggested that Iverson is merely trying to improve his golf game. Since the ruling, he has been regularly driving the greens at exclusive Rolling Hills Country Club - with his sand wedge. Justice Iverson is aged 92.

    In related news, senior mafia officials pledged to 'eradicate chance' from casinos across the USA.

  8. Re:I'm go'na start bootleging roller coasters by ComaVN · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe you could make a peer-to-peer rollercoaster network. Put a piece of it in everyone's backyard, so there's no individual to sue if things go wrong.

    --
    Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
  9. Re:G-forces. by JWhitlock · · Score: 2, Funny
    The Viper (a relatively new steel coaster) at Six Flags Great Adventure is horrible in terms of comfort. The ride isn't that exciting and thanks to the design of the shoulder restraints most of the ride experience is liken to being repeatedly punched in the ear.

    Yeah, when it came to naming it, it was a dead heat between "The Viper" and "Punches to the Ear!" I think Six Flags chose wisely.

  10. Re:What about roads and highways? by Longstaff · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know that metal bar on the back of the trailer? Yeah that's what is supposed to protect you from being decapitated, all trucks have them.

    If you had ever worked with large trucks first hand you'd realize that those things are largely worthless.

    First, there are loading docks that actually latch onto the underride bars to keep the trailers in place - how many times do you think people forget to disengage them before trying to drive off. This doesn't always tear the guard off, just weakens it.

    Second, those guards are often too high to stop a car from underriding. The theory is that they will hit your engine block, collapse and scrape along your hood - buckling it - until you stop. Um, yeah. That works great if you're in something with a hood that high. (hint: Metro and Miata drivers are screwed)

    Anyway, I agree with you that there is a higher percentage of safe and conscientious drivers with a CDL than not. The real problem is that 1 bad truck driver can 100x more lethal per incident than some poor schmuck in an Aspire with no clue. Unfortunately, there are too many schmucks on the road creating too many incidents.

    Back (sorta) on topic, there definitely needs to be *some* sort of regulation on coasters - operationally as well as mechanically. At the bare minimum, I'd like to see info outside the ride on max speed, max G, sustained G and running time - so I don't wait 2 hours in line for a 10 second ride! ;-).