Slashdot Mirror


E3 Doom III Preview

Warped-Reality writes "GameSpy has a new Doom III Preview covering aspects of the storyline and how Doom III will be different from the rest of the FPS genre. It includes some pictures of the E3 Doom III demo booth. As the article says, "This is DOOM III, and it's going to scare you to hell."" Looking at these images, I can only say two things: Wow and Cool Toilets. Update: 05/22 19:55 GMT by M : There's also an interview with Carmack giving a few more details about the game.

18 of 401 comments (clear)

  1. Cool Toilets by donnacha · · Score: 5, Funny


    Wow and Cool toilets

    Now, this is why I always wipe the seat before sitting down.

    1. Re:Cool Toilets by Macrobat · · Score: 5, Funny
      Now, this is why I always wipe the seat before sitting down.
      Ummm....those toilets aren't the kind you're ever supposed to sit down on. And if you do, I don't want to know about it.
      --
      "Hardly used" will not fetch you a better price for your brain.
  2. Re:Co-Op by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yep. I heard that you'll be able to sell your own organic fruits and vegetables to unsuspecting yuppie zombies on level 6.

    Co-ops are great for fresh food, but are you going to be able to keep up with the demand for fresh brains?

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  3. More Doom 3... by Drakker · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can also check:

    gamespot
    more from gamespot

    And get the Doom 3 legacy movie from here:

    3d gamers

    It doesnt have much footage from Doom 3, but it got interviews with some people from Id Software.

    All links graciously ripped off: Voodoo Extreme.

  4. Nice, but... by JavaJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While there's no denying this looks stunning, particularly the environments, I can't help but notice the characters are all pretty low poly. They're hardly better than Quake 3 level it seems. At first, sure, they look pre-rendered almost, but you can see poly edges around the sihlouettes first, and then on closer inspection you can start to see sharp angles elsewhere within the models.

    Carmack's trick of using high poly models for lighting and shading calculations and then projecting that onto lower poly models may make for some amazing visuals, great damage effects, and much better facial animation, but IMO the low poly in game models need to have maybe 2x the detail just to make a good base for the higher poly lighting/shading calculations. That or hope that all the next gen cards have N-patch support or some other form of HOS support *and* that it can be used with Doom 3. Otherwise it looks like it's going to be an incredible engine that will be let down a bit by low poly characters. No doubt the in game assets and performance are still being tweaked of course.

    - JavaJones

    1. Re:Nice, but... by JavaJones · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sounds like Carmack's approach paid off for you. I suggest it is you that needs to look closer however and find out a bit more about what you're talking about in regards to Doom 3 and its approach to character rendering. Section 4.7 (subsection 7 of section 4) of the unnofical Doom 3 FAQ has some speculation and third hand info on the subject that might be of interest to you. Doom 3 FAQ: What sort of engine will Doom 3 use? I'll try to dig up Carmack's quotes on the subject as well. Suffice to say he has been careful to point out that Doom 3 makes heavy use of bump maps.

      Take a look at the areas of the high rez screens I've conveniently circled for you here. Note the rather obvious poly edges. Note that the apparent frontal detail of characters does not generally show up on edges, indicating the geometry is not actually present on the in game model. You see what appears to be unbelievable detail on any camera facing surface, but on the edges of the model it is quite obvious it does not have that level of detail. If you don't see it now, you're beyond help.

      Granted, much of the detail is actual in game geometry, but what's really selling the effect is the texture maps, bump maps, and lighting. I'd be willing to bet the models aren't any more high poly than Soldier of Fortune II, but they sure look better, eh? There's no denying there's a poly increase from previous iD games, but it takes a back seat to the lighting and shading technology. And while i don't expect a 10x increase in poly count, 2x would be nice given how good the rest of everything looks.

      - JavaJones

    2. Re:Nice, but... by stevarooski · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mod the parent up! He's right--just adding more polygons is really a no-brainer brute force solution. Its the increasing number of effects supported in hardware that is REALLY coming into play with new games coming out today.

      There are lots of neat things one can do that look great and cost less to render than extra geometry. I obviously don't know the details of the engine, but as a lowly undergrad interested in graphics I know that just adding bump mapping alone can make tremendous difference in how 'real' a scene looks--and all it does is mess with how surface normals are used in shading. Very low cost! And thats just one effect alone--add surface geometry manipulations based on height maps and you get low-cost facial features. Gauraud (and hopefully soon, Phong) interpretation gets rid of polygon edges in hardware quickly. Finally, add lightmaps and (limited) dynamic shadows and all of a sudden you have an engine that can really express atmosphere.

      Yeah, being able to render more polys is great, but when you finally get to boot up Doom 3 you'll really get to see some of the payoff you were promised when you bought that geForce 3. :o)

      --

      - - - - - - - -
      Don't worry, being eaten by a crocodile is just like going to sleep in a giant blender.
  5. Fear over action - not the Doom I remember by galaga79 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to this quote from John Carmack it looks like we are going to be getting a Doom game quite different its successors. Hell it looks more like Resident Evil or Half Life than the original Doom games.

    John Carmack: Doom III is pushing the fear factor over the raw action. As you make the worlds more and more believable, you are forced to tone down the "superhero" aspects of the game. I still think that a good game can be built around "toon time" action, but that isn't what Doom III is going to be about. The monsters are going to be much more independently fearsome, rather than just acting as moving gun turrets.

    I don't know about the rest of you but for me Doom was the action orientated gameplay, where for example often you had to take on over a dozen imps with a mere shotgun. It would be great to relive that experience all over again in a 3D fully environment powered by a cutting engine.

    However perhaps this shift isn't all bad because part of the reason Doom was all action orientated in that it lacked a substantial story. Yet for the first time it looks Doom will have a proper story with science fiction writer Matthew Costello doing the story and dialog. Also the shift way from action can be attributed to the fact that 3D models aren't as efficent as Doom's 2D sprites when you want to put lots of enemies on screen.

    Despite the gameplay differences hopefully there will be some camoes of the original Doom enemies or weapons in the game.

  6. Backtracking? by red5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has been one of the areas where I know we are going to get some negative feedback. Doom III will only have minimal multiplayer facilities when released, because we are concentrating all of our efforts on making it an outstanding single-player experience.

    Remmber when ID announced that Quake 3 would be only multiplayer.
    Sinlgle player is dead etc.

    The only problem with that was the over sateration that happened just after. Single player is back. I can't wait.
    The problem with multi player is that most of us are tired of compeeting all the time.
    It's also worth noting that the biggest selling (IIRC) game on the PS2 (GTA3) has no multiplayer mode.

    --
    I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
  7. Avoid the wait... by Nailer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fetch the screenshots then view them when you're done...

    for i in $(seq 1 20); do wget http://www.gamespy.com/e32002/pc/doom3b/"$i".jpg; done

  8. Okay, if I had a chance to interview Carmack by Sludge · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Here is what I'd ask. (Yes, I know he will probably read this, and yes, this is pre-meditated in the chance of an opportunity arising.)

    You've expressed your opinions on using Java as the language to replace DLLs in the past. Two of the reasons you gave for not using Java were the bleeding edge nature of the APIs which added more chaos to the already chaotic Quake stew than you were willing to give, and the speed of execution. Although it isn't as efficient as straight C code, what are your impressions with Perl since you learnt it a while back? Would you consider writing the client and server game logic modules in a multiplayer oriented game in a different language from each other?

    Early during the development of Quake 2, Brian Hook said in an interview once saying that you said that you would most likely be a leader in the real time gaming graphics field until around 2004. If this is an accurate recollection of something you said at that time, what did you foresee happening that might raise the question of your respectable dominance in the realtime gaming graphics field?

    Doom is going to be using hardcoded DLLs again, since the move to C++ negated your ability to use LCC retargeted to bytecode. This has, most likely caused you to see the significance of standardizing the bytecode instead of the language. Are there any plans in the future for retargeting compilers of other languages for the purpose of security and cross platformism wins with using virtual machines? If so, will they use the same bytecode as Quake 3 did?

    You have expressed enthusiasm many times for the NeXT STeP environment and how you might still be developing under it if there was support for target hardware. Have you looked at the functionality of GNUStep, which is a project attempting to close the functionality of NeXTSTeP?

    In every Id product, the bugs that have crept up are rarely related to the renderer and therefore rarely likely to be code you wrote. Do you feel that you produce few uncaught or unreproducible bugs in general compared to most developers, or is it because the renderer is so throughly tested in the development of idgames due to it's fundamental placement in the games architectures?

  9. Men's bathroom by jcsehak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Note to women of Slashdot: This is why you should never use the men's bathroom.

    And what are those things sticking out over the urinals? Even without the monster there, I'd be scared to take a piss. Flushers? Infared sensors? None like I've seen. I don't know about you guys, but I generally don't like anything that close to my dick unless it can make babies or tell me it needs more space.

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:Men's bathroom by 7-Vodka · · Score: 5, Funny

      they obviously shake it for you.

      --

      Liberty.

  10. Re:But... but... by Glytch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, cry me a fucking river. There's a lot of us who want an enjoyable single-player game for once, and not have to have our skill determined by our ISP's ping time. You've got Counterstrike, Q3, UT, ad nauseum. Let the rest of us enjoy a new game, and not a rehashing of the Q2 engine, for once.

  11. Wow! by sharkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't wait to see the Barney mod for this!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  12. Re:The original Doom/ Doom II were scary by TellarHK · · Score: 5, Funny

    *stomp stomp stomp stomp stomp*
    RAAAAAGRH!
    *whoosh whoosh*
    *BOOM*

    Now THOSE were the sounds of fear. Nothing has surpassed the original cyberdemon for me.

    Except maybe my first panicked headcrab assault.

  13. Re:Co-Op by Thing+1 · · Score: 5, Funny
    but are you going to be able to keep up with the demand for fresh brains?

    "Send more cops."

    ...

    "Send more paramedics."

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  14. Re:Was at E3 (i'm just an intern at EA) by ToLu+the+Happy+Furby · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are about 4 different monsters that I saw, and all other monsters were clones of these monsters. I mean, the big fat belled one, it's very cool and all, but does ID need to have 100's of the same monster running around? What's the logic here?

    Doom3 is nowhere near done; the only release date they're specifying at E3 is "2003", and most likely it won't be January either. In other words, they have around a year's work left on this game, maybe more. Presumably they will spend that time adding many many more character models, or even (hopefully) coming up with a way to generate different bump/displacement maps for the same character and thus avoid the "two of the exact same zombie" syndrome that affects the current screenshots.

    In any case, it's pretty obvious the issue will be solved in the final game.