Slashdot Mirror


USMC Shows Off New Toys

jonerik writes "And speaking of the future of unmanned combat, Wired today has this article on several new toys being developed for the U.S. Marine Corps. The Dragon Eye is a small remote-controlled airplane which can be disassembled and carried in a field pack. The Dragon Runner is a miniature camera-equipped wheeled truck about the size of a shoebox which can be sent into dangerous areas as a scout. The Dragon Warrior is a small unmanned helicopter which looks like a toilet seat with wings. Perhaps most intriguing is a device unofficially dubbed the RoboLobster, which skitters around on eight mechanical legs, detecting and disarming mines. Although the Dragon Eye is scheduled for deployment next year, the other three devices are still in the development stage."

35 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. did they recruit ENIX to name these? by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

    Dragon Warrior? sheesh.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  2. Uh-Oh!! by donnacha · · Score: 2


    The Dragon Runner is a miniature camera-equipped wheeled truck about the size of a shoebox which can be sent into dangerous areas as a scout.

    What's the betting that the Web will soon be swamped with pop-ups offering to sell us the X10.Com version of these?

    1. Re:Uh-Oh!! by danamania · · Score: 2

      ...would it be cheating to take them into a paintball game?

      a grrl & her server

  3. Attack by Krapangor · · Score: 3, Funny
    The Dragon Warrior is a small unmanned helicopter which looks like a toilet seat with wings

    I don't want to know how it attacks the enemy.
    BTW: Is the rumor true that the Trud Report has signed up with the army ?

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
  4. Windows-based? by ZigMonty · · Score: 4, Insightful
    And the plane will pretty much fly on its own. After a few commands are given to a Windows-based navigation program, the eye will pilot itself using a global positioning system.

    Nooooooooo...

    [Insert obligatory BSOD joke]

  5. NO replacement for human bravery by yeOldeSkeptic · · Score: 5, Insightful


    The escape of Osama Bin Laden and the invisibility
    of the Abu Sayyaff in the jungles of the Philippines
    show one thing. No amount of high tech weaponry
    and no surfeit of surveillance equipment can beat
    a human on the ground. After several months of
    scrutinizing the tiny island of Basilan, using
    satellites, aircraft and what not, no trace
    of the kidnapped Burnhams have been detected.
    The Abu Sayyaff and their hostages have effectively
    vanished.


    As the US Marine Corps continues to progress
    towards its vision of the modern warrior, I
    hope it remembers that human brains and
    courage is still more valuable than all the
    modern technology in the world.

    1. Re:NO replacement for human bravery by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

      Since General Charles Krulak kick started the heavy modernization a few years ago, the Marine Corps has been holding to the concept of "Equip the man, not man the equipment". The Marine Corps philosophy is that all the weapons and equipment they use exists for one reason and one reason alone- Get the infantry into a position where they can do their thing and blow apart anything that faces them.

    2. Re:NO replacement for human bravery by Nindalf · · Score: 2

      You obviously haven't heard of next year's project: "I Can't Believe It's Not Human Bravery!" the human bravery substitute in a can.

      Now, these results are purely preliminary, but in early field testing 9 out of 10 guerilla soldiers, terrorists, and hostage-takers couldn't tell the difference!

      Folgers Defense Contracting is also working on a crystalline substitute of some kind.

  6. Noise Issues by sheriff_p · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds a bit noisy to me, personally. I know I'd get pretty suspicious if I was a soldier and saw one coming towards me. Plus, I'd probably take aim at it - I hope they're cheap.

    --
    Score:-1, Funny
  7. But getting them to use it... by globaljustin · · Score: 2

    These new toys are great, but the challenge will be to get these "18 and 19 year old" grunts (I use the term respectfully) to actually use them in battle.

    Unless the Marine Corps. has changed recently, no self-respecting Marine will want to be dicking around with an RC car when they are in the middle of combat.

    Nevertheless, I applaud the Marines for using technology to its fullest in the battlefield.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:But getting them to use it... by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

      The Marine Corps already fields UAVs. It is likely that these goodies will be fielded to reconnasaince units and the already existing UAV squadrons.

      Don't worry too much, the Marine Corps is updating the full spectrum of combat gear, from the socks Marines wear(not joking) to their ambhibious armored vehicles and their fighters.

    2. Re:But getting them to use it... by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

      "Now matter how many pretty fancy toys you have, your best freinds in combat are your feet and your weapon. If you doubt that, just walk around for ten hours or so without sitting down."

      Done it. It sucks.

      "ICB (infantry combat boots) are the most comfortable boots I ever wore. Now if only someone in the civilian world would make them with a steel/safety toe."

      I agree. When I left Iwakuni, I had gotten mine the day before my flight. I figured, why not wear them home and break them in conveniently? 36 hours straight I had those things on and not a problem.

      "Semper fi."

      Semper Fi

    3. Re:But getting them to use it... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Actually they're going to pack in RC Pro-Am with the Dragon Eye so it'll be entertaining enough for the jarheads.

  8. little boys with teddy bears? by cruelworld · · Score: 2

    So which one is the Second Variety?

  9. Kind of makes you wonder... by pjdoland · · Score: 5, Funny

    Doesn't the USMC run "Toys for Tots?"

    --
    -- "The reward of suffering is experience." - Aeschylus
  10. Wave of the Future by Detritus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It looks like technology is starting to catch up with science fiction. When I was a soldier, I wished that someone would invent a small, remote controlled, video camera that could fly like a helicopter. I was never a big fan of detecting the presence of the enemy by getting shot.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  11. Summary missed some details. by Nindalf · · Score: 2

    What about the Dragon's Breath (a self-propelled, autonomous microwave for warming field rations) or the Dragon's [censored] (a self-propelled autonomous latrine)?

    These are especially important since the Dragon Warrior is unlikely to ever be put into service due to issues with infinite loops in the control software ("Dost thou love me?" "No" "But thou must!"), and a vulnerability to enemy subversion, despite self-destruct failsafes. Also, there is a considerable amount of tuning and calibration that each unit must go through under battlefield conditions, and there aren't always enough slimes and drakees to use for target practice. Finally, budget cuts threaten to drastically under-equip each unit, and simulations show that the operators quickly resort to looting defeated enemies.

  12. Spiffy New Gear. by Srakkt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When these are issued out at Combined Arms eXercise at 29 Palms, and the geek-infantryman (believe me, they exist, I am one) is told to report to the commanding officer and figure the damn thing out so that it can be used, I'll believe these things are being used.
    Still, the point here is that if it's not exceedingly easy to use, it won't get used. If there are lots of little parts that have to go in the case, they're going to get lost. SL-3 gear for night vision gets lost all the time. The PEQ-2 infrared laser sight for the M-16 is a good example. There's a neato little switch that mounts, using adhesive and velcro, to the handguard. We never use it, though. it's supposed to stay in the pouch, but it gets lost. All the little bits and pieces that come with this junk get lost. Just like the little pieces of MoLLE gear, just like the little pieces of SL-3 for anything that comes with little garbage.
    A note to you engineers out there designing stuff for us to go kill people with: Make it monolithic. Configurable is nice and stuff, but if there are little parts that can get lost, they will get lost.
    It happens with all the stuff we have now; it'll happen with the DragonEye. Which, by the way, I don't ever want to have to hump into an LZ. I bet it doesn't de well wet, either. Well guess what? Grunts get wet and muddy on a sunny day. We're not happy unless we're wet and muddy. This thing isn't going to last long, I surmise. It's going to get broken too much.

  13. Attack assistant? by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    "If a Marine can use (Microsoft) Word, he can get this plane to fly."

    It looks like you are trying to crash this plane into the ground - would you like me to autoformat your controlled flight into terrain?

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  14. Re:ROBOLOBSTER!! by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Instead of blowing up the robot, it would be cheaper for it to put an explosive on the mine and detonate it after moving away. Radio-controlled explosive is cheaper than a robot.

  15. One word.... by thumbtack · · Score: 2

    Battlebots!

  16. Star Trek needs this by asv108 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Enterprise needs to get dragonfly technology, I never understood why every time there is a dangerous situation, they send in the top 3 officers ;)

  17. Upgrade to the Pointer? by Animats · · Score: 2

    The USMC has had the AeroVironment Pointer for about a decade now. This is a model airplane with a TV camera, small enough to be carried in a backpack. It's Kevlar, and powered by silver-zinc batteries (which, by the way, are great, but cost too much.) Range of a few miles, endurance of maybe an hour. (The maker says 1.5 hours, reports say 30 minutes.) Toss into the air, fly over the hill, and get a small-screen peek at the enemy. Moderately useful, not overdesigned, and reasonably rugged. For example, landing is done by coming in low, pulling up into a stall, cutting the power, and crashing tail-first, the typical model airplane bad landing.

  18. Re:Dragon Runner by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

    ACtually, the US does use mines, though rarely. The border between north and south korea is covered in mines, as is the area around Guantanamo Bay Cuba. Those two locations are why the US did not sign the mine ban treaty.

  19. moral issues? by small_dick · · Score: 2

    When the pentagon drags a mouse over a foreign country and unleashes robotic hell on them, and people dying via remote control, one has to ask how far we are from large machines crunching their way over fields of human skulls.

    Is this really where humanity wants to go?

    --


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
    See my user info for links.
    1. Re:moral issues? by canadian_right · · Score: 2
      The higher ups have been doing this for a long time, even back when they would use a pointer to move toys on a big map.

      If you must fight, and you can reduce or eliminate the use of your own people it would be unethical NOT to use the technology that removes people from harms way.

      A completely seperate issue is will this lack of danger for 'our' side make 'our' side more likely to resort to force? I think that the USA already has such a ridiculously high kill ratio that this is an issue now, but it seems that the USA has just gotten more and more sensitive to soldier's deaths. Expectations simply grow with the technology.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
  20. GPLed autonomous aerial robots by tramm · · Score: 3, Informative
    If you're interested in experimenting with these sorts of things, check out http://autopilot.sourceforge.net/. We're building the inertial sensors (IMU, GPS+INS) and writing the software to control autonomous helicopters.

    If you just want to try flying one, we have also have written an OpenGL simulator.

    Here's your change to try it without signing up for the Marines.

    --
    -- http://www.swcp.com/~hudson/
  21. Metal Gear! Aieee! by Colol · · Score: 2

    You know that's what's coming next. Giant killer mecha that will be hijacked by terrorists for their own evil uses.

    And only Hideo Kojima will be able to save us.

  22. I guess no one ever told you... by Jagasian · · Score: 2

    I guess no one ever told you about atomic weapons, the end of the war with Japan, and the cold war.

  23. Is this related? by wdavies · · Score: 2

    Dragon Flyer

    I saw this via Apple's homepage... sounds like you can buy your eye in the sky...

    Winton

  24. Future Risks by alienmole · · Score: 2

    The problem with better weapons is that they cut both ways. The US military may be ahead in the applications of this kind of thing right now, but they're leveraging existing technology, a lot of which is available off the shelf - microcontrollers, MEMS accelerometers and gyroscopes, and standard RC gear. How long until terrorists or guerillas are using small unmanned helicopters, planes and cars to deliver explosives inside secure facilities, or to assassinate world leaders?

  25. Memo from Lucas, G. to USMC command by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2

    Your plans to use ground and airborne autonomous robots in combat are indeed impressive. I have to warn you though, that my recent analyses strongly indicate that your entire attack force can be beaten by the first opponent who fields a well-designed clone army, or for that matter a bunch of poorly-armed semi-sentient amphibians and a small boy. Consider yourselves warned.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  26. A terrorist's shopping list by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Using model airplanes as a military tool is very popular these days and some of the more sophisticated ones (such as the X-45) may well be the future of "safe" combat.

    However, don't fall into the trap of thinking that the US is the only force to have such combat tools or that this "off the shelf" technology can't be used against targets with the borders of the USA.

    Check out The Low Cost Cruise Missile scenario for some insight into the opportunity this stuff gives to half-smart terrorist groups.

  27. RC vehicles used before by USMC by gurudyne · · Score: 2, Informative

    When the Marines took Kuwait City in the Gulf Warr, they drove RC worn-out trucks through the "impenetrable" mine fields.

    --
    Hey, Mom! Is it beer, yet?
  28. Grunt's perspective on technology by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2

    The Marine's perspective on technology can be inferred by their description of their combat knife: It has zero electronics and zero moving parts, it is the most reliable weapon you will carry.

    The Marines are very unlikely to lose the proper perspective that the basic Marine rifleman is their most important weapon. As an organization they are extremely mindful of the fact that the character of their people and the training of their people are their most important assets. Historically they have done a good job introducing new technology while keeping their perspective.

    For example one of the most important new technologies in modern warfare has been aviation. The Marines embraced aviation but adopted the perspective that Marine aviation exists to help grunts. To become a pilot in the Marines you must first prove yourself as a rifle platoon commander. You may sign up to become a pilot but you start your career going to Officer Candidate School at Quantico where you will learn to be a grunt and how to effectively command grunts.