Linux Development Kernel 2.5.18 Released
the_real_tigga writes: "Well, the day is almost over, and still today's release of version 2.5.18 of the Linux development kernel tree has not yet hit Slashdot.
It is out, the official site is of course kernel.org, but be sure to check your local mirrors (usually www.country.kernel.org).
Here is the long Changelog,
major changes include suspend-to-RAM, more IDE and VFS fixes, and kbuild.
Linux Weekly has the news too, and a summary of the changes."
Folks,
buffer_head is now in its own header file, so in suspend.c, for example, you will need to include
< linux/buffer_head.h >.
Also, to get HFS (Apple filesystem) to compile, you have to include < linux/pagemap.h >
Best of luck...
w o r l d w i d e w e b e r
Do we really need /. to let us know when a kernel is released?
YES! Its more fun to watch a mob try to pick at it, rip it apart, and maul the latest tarball in a public pit of interrogation. Its great to see open source build strength and character amid the assault.
Everyone knows a kernel that isn't exposed to the elements will be weak, whereas one that faces the full challenges of nature will grow to be strong and fertile for the next generation.
They lied, this is actually suspend-to-disk, or swap, to be specific. The difference between this and the apm suspend, is that the apm suspend counts on the bios to do most of the work, while this addition (formerly called software-suspend) does it all in software, without any bios help. So, the computer doesn't still need to be on, and the bios can be from 1890 and it will still work.
http://students.washington.edu/djwatson
For those who don't have time to follow every kernel release, there's a page someone put together to follow all the big changes going into the 2.5 developement series here
This is actually explained pretty well on the project's page which is here
I tried compiling it but it wont work.
What is wrong? I am using VC++ 6 on Windows XP, with all updates, why wont it work?!
Do we really need /. to let us know when a kernel is released?
Of course, if you don't want to hear about linux, you can always exclude it from your topic list in your preferences.
Michael
There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
You're right about Suspend-to-RAM turning off most of the components, it also turns off the PSU and CPU fans, and you can't tell the difference between a computer on STR and one switched off, except for a tiny LED on the motherboard (at least on my mobo).
What you described is called "S1", it's suspend mode with the PSU and CPU fan running (but harddisks and graphics card turned off), which leaves the computer loud but dead.
Copied and pasted from a Google search result, the suspend "codes" are: Full-on (SO), Stop Grant (S1), Suspend to RAM (S3), Suspend to Disk (S4), and Soft-off (S5).
With STR, 5v run off the PSU to keep the RAM recharged. This is the same 5v that run for features like Wake-On-[LAN,Modem,Keyboard].
So I guess the kernel has suspend support now. That's cool, I use STR on Windows 2000 all the time, it would be cool to have it on Linux, but somehow I don't feel like using a dev-kernel.
What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
YES! Its more fun to watch a mob try to pick at it, rip it apart, and maul the latest tarball in a public pit of interrogation. Its great to see open source build strength and character amid the assault.
Yeah, but shouldn't we be testing the kernel, not the kernel.org ftp server? :)
grnbrg
I'll submit an article whenever Microsoft releases a hotfix!
No you won't - slashdot has a timer that stops you from submitting that often.
(sorry)
You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
There is a lot of hype here.