HP Must Defend Half-Empty "Economy" Ink Cartridges
An Anonymous Coward excerpts this short Detroit News story, which begins "PALO ALTO, Calif. -- Hewlett-Packard Co. must defend the sale of half-full ink cartridges with its printers after a Minnesota appellate court reinstated a lawsuit against the world's largest maker of printers.
Three Minnesota women claim that the company doesn't reveal that the 'economy cartridges' installed on new printers are only half full of ink." The cost of refills is why I've given up on inkjet printers entirely (for now) -- guess which division of HP made more money than the other four combined?
99% of the stuff you're printing is going to be black and white anyway, so why not fork out the extra $100 or so and get a budget laserprinter? Considering ink cartridges cost, what, about $50 these days anyway, you'll find the laser option more affordable in the long run.
"Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
If you look at the cart. it lists the amount of ink.. in Canada it is marked in ml. If you have one of the Office class printers the black cartrige costs about $50 and contain about 40ml of ink If you hav one of the cheap sub $100 printers it still costs about $50 for the cart but it only contains about 20ml of ink.. Its clearly marked on the cart and on the box.. I ALWAYS check how much ink is in the cart before deciding on wich printer I get. By the way the Canon BCI-21 Black contains only about 5 - 10 ml of ink.
EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
The whole ink jet printer industry reminds me of the razor/blade industry. They sell you the printer cheap, then screw you hard for the inks making sure you run out fast on the first set of cartridges just like the razor folks only give you one or two "starter" blades. But then again, Carly didn't put a gun to my head and forced me to buy the printer. It works well but is expensive to operate in the long run.
Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
The load generated by a small laser printer is smaller than your run of the mill hairdryer. So it may be safer, but I'm not sure that laser printers are unsafe.
Also, the documents produced by injets are unsafe and are easily destroyed by moisture. This is my biggest problem with injets.
As an aside, I have used laser printers that could draw 12 amps since it did multi-stage color laser printing. And the first time we printed with it, BAM the lights went out.
Dean's Rule #45. The truth hurts for a moment. A lie hurts for a long time.
They key is to use remanufactured toner and inkjet cartridges from a reputable, low-volume company. High-volume companies do a lousy job. Refilled cartridges are also not the same thing as remanufactured cartridges.
A good remanufacturer takes apart the entire cartridge by hand and replaces worn parts. They then fill the cartridge completely full with toner that is often better than what HP/Lexmark/etc use.
I buy toner cartridges from this place in my city. They have a 100% guarantee on their cartridges. However, every cartridge I've gotten from them has been fantastic. I'm not sure of any decent Internet shops, but I believe this small-town shop can ship cartridges also.
...to sell half-full ink cartridges with new printers. I just bought an Epson C80 and I'm sure that the ink cartridges that came with it are of the 'economy' class.
What bothers me more than that is that Epson puts microchips into their cartridges so that "the user can get more information about the state of the cartridges." I'm sure that the side-effect of not allowing me to refill the cartridges was an oversight. Yeah, right.
The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!