Slashdot Mirror
Countries Ponder: GNU/Linux vs. Microsoft
koody writes: "IDG has an overview of how many countries are getting drawn into the debate over the relative merits of using open source software rather than Microsoft Corp.'s Windows applications. Seems like many countries would be slowly moving towards the open source community, while a few still pledge allegiance to Microsoft."
They should pick an OS and go with it, preferably what's best for the person that has to use it every day, regardless of cost (or in some cases, taking total end cost into consideration) I'm all for standards. Standards solve issues ranging from product compatibility to addressing consumer safety and health concerns. Standards also simplify product development and reduce non-value-adding costs thereby increasing a user's ability to compare competing products. They also are fundamental building blocks for international trade. Only through the use of standards can the requirements of interconnectivity and interoperability be assured and the credibility of new products and new markets verified enabling the rapid implementation of technology. It's too bad so many of you bearded linux hippies insist on doing things your own kludged-together way.
The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
That's probably because developpers in poor countries can't afford to work for free.
Hmmmmm, but I understand your confusion. Let's see if I can get this into a frame of reference you can understand:
You Linux guys suck -- none of you are as smart or have dicks as big as us FreeBSD guys.
How was that? Sigh. The other reason I can't in good faith recommend Linux to people is because then they'd have to deal with dickheads like you every time they had a problem.
Sun and Apple use and release GPL software.
MS have paid no taxes so they get no consideration.
I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.