Harry Potter, Macrovision and Economics
markthebrewer writes "Apparantly Warner Home Video have released Harry Potter and the Philosopher's/Sorcerer's Stone without any of the usual Macrovision copy-protection systems.
Looks like its just a trial, but someone's done the maths and decided it may be cheaper not to copy-protect videos after all.
Find the full article in the
New Scientist." There is certainly something desperate about macrovisions response to this development. Does anyone see macrovision as a real barrier to copying anymore? What a bunch of snake oil salesmen these people are. In related news, I'm marketing my own personal copy protection device.
I thought Macrovision was mandatory? Does Time Warner get an out because it's a member of the consortium? That certainly doesn't sound fair.
-- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
It doesn't count if its at the "You may now turn off your computer" screen. ;)
I have a shitty sig!
To think that anyone would even desire to copy this movie.
http://www.urbanreflex.com/may24_02/record.html
"It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
In Russian some people call Macrovision "Mracovision", what can be approximately translated as "see the darkness". I find it a very funny and appropriate name for that bullshit.
Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
I always thought it was designed to simulate tape stretch or a dirty playback head.