Slashdot Mirror


AP reports on renewed "Browser War"

An anonymous reader writes "CNN and others are reporting an Associated Press story on "the revived browser war" with Mozilla paired against Microsoft. It seems the 1.0 release is creating some waves out there. " Considering most people consider the war long since over, I can't imagine this mattering much.

14 of 592 comments (clear)

  1. Re:90%+ for IE still by loply · · Score: 5, Funny

    My logs go something like: 50% IE 20% Moz 10% Konq 20% CodeRed

  2. A bit of history by b.foster · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Microsoft won the browser war because IE4 beat the hell out of any other browser that was available at the time. In fact, IE4 beats the hell out of the latest Netscape 4.7x release on any platform.

    Unfortunately for Bill Gates, his company has rested on its laurels. IE6 offers little that wasn't present in IE5, and the many useful features in Mozilla 1.0 (tabbed browsing, anti-popup features, speed, stability, and security) mean that IE will be losing a significant amount of market share very soon.

    And how can we complain about that? May the best product win - again. It's nice to see open source come out on top.

  3. IE7 and CSS by Dr.+Eric+Peters · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Based on secondhand reports, it sounds to me as if IE7 is going to bring *major* advances in CSS support for Windows Internet Explorer. They're going to fix the box model, with bugwards compatibility handled via a DOCTYPE sniffing strategy similar to IE6/Mac's.

    This is a hugely significant event for advocates of CSS. I'm eagerly looking forward to this, even though I don't plan on ever using Windows on a regular basis. Given Microsoft's ability to bulldoze Windows users into upgrading, we may soon have a world in which, for the first time ever, *the dominant Web browser* has good CSS support.

    This could improve things for CSS in general even if we don't end up with the dreaded Microsoft-only world. Developers of *other* browsers will no longer be able to hide behind claims of industry-leader compatibility when releasing buggy CSS implementations.

    Of course DOCTYPE sniffing is going to complicate the situation somewhat, since IE7 will still have a bugwards compatibility mode. I'm hoping that the existence of IE7 will cause enough people start intentionally invoking standards mode that other browser developers notice. While from a theoretical point of view DOCTYPE sniffing makes no sense--it's a pure hack--in practice it's a lot better than no standards mode at all, which is the only likely alternative.

    Furthermore, my secondhand source also tells me that IE7 will finally bring full PNG support to IE. This is a major step ahead in InterNet graphics.

  4. The War War by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm starting a new war. It's called the War on War. If you're sick of all these Wars, please join my war.

    Seriously, who really wants to read about browser wars any more? The market will dictate which browser "wins." The rest of the browsers will have to be happy with less than a majority of users.

    Big friggin whoopty-do!

    I use mozilla because I like it. If MSIE comes out with something better, I might use it instead.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  5. If the war is over, who's the loser? by donutz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clearly, the consumer.

    If I added up all the time spent closing those annoying pop up/under windows with IE, I'm sure it'd more than make up for the time spent waiting for Mozilla to get swapped back into memory (I often run a lotta apps, and Mozilla uses a lot of RAM (who doesn't these days?)...

    And then there's the seizure-inducing rapid-flash animated gifs that loop to infinity in IE...in Mozilla I can set them to run just once. Or not view them at all (or only ones from the same server). The savings from not paying those medical expenses...I could put a down payment on a house with that money instead!

    The Tabs are a nice feature...when I'm running a lotta apps, there's no room for text on the Taskbar...but my tabs can tell me what page they're holding for me.

    If everyone else sticks with IE, at least I know I'm happier browsing now than I was before. Thanks Mozilla!

  6. Self-Hype by TWR · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Quote from article:

    Mozilla may thrill some tech-savvy users, "but it's not going to make a dent with the mainstream," said WebSideStory's Geoff Johnston, unless, that is, AOL Time Warner puts major marketing muscle behind it.

    Like, oh, I don't know, having the news division of AOL Time Warner run stories on the browser?

    -jon

    --

    Remember Amalek.

  7. Mozilla's path to victory: Annoyance free browsing by sterno · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The big problem I've found when I am pressed into using IE for whatever reason is the ridiculous amount of ad-related annoyances I have to deal with. Pop-over ads, pop-under ads, animated things flying all over my screen, etc. And this isn't even at the pr0n sites!

    I think Mozilla's chance to grab some market share is by pushing for the fact that it gives you control over these annoyances. Turn off all of those unrequested popups with a couple of mouse clicks, or you can go back to using IE and have to close a bazillion windows every time you are done surfing.

    So, I think the browser war isn't quite over, it's just going to be fought on a different front.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  8. Re:War is over unless AOL changes default by Hollins · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Think about it. You're AOL and half of America's internet subscribers go through you. Because 95% of surfers are using IE, sites are built to display on IE. Many sites are designed to display properly in IE, standards be damned, meaning they don't work on a properly performing browser. Many don't allow anything but IE to use their services.

    Now, to convert your entire userbase to Netscape will mean a significant portion of sites will no longer look correct or will cease to work entirely. Your customers don't understand browser compliance, they merely know that they could visit sites with AOL 7, but not AOL 8. Is the deluge of customer support phone calls and email really worth the hassle?

  9. Washington Post has a story too by peterdaly · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Washington Post has a favorable review of Mozilla 1.0 as well, with I though was interesting because a) it's read by politicians among others, and b) it is a review of Mozilla and not Nutscrape.

    Anyway, here is the link. One of his favorite features was the ability to block ads. He even tells people how to turn that feature on.

    -Pete

  10. Frosted glass by jlusk4 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/complexspira l/glassy.html

    Those of you using IE will need to switch to Mozilla. Those of you using Mozilla won't even notice the part that doesn't work under IE, it feels so natural.

    Cool effect that works only under Mozilla and just feels right. Now who's at the disadvantage?

  11. AOL 8.0 Beta still uses IE by cpeterso · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for AOL to use Netscape, considering AOL 8.0 Beta 1 was just released and it still uses IE.

  12. Re:losing a significant amount of market share by zulux · · Score: 5, Funny


    Bookmarked.

    Care to bet on this?


    Don't you mean "My Favorites" ?

    Here's a hint: Right click on "My Computer" then rename it to "My Komputer." Then all your fiends will think youre a cool KDE Linux user.

    Gotta go.. The paperclip is helping me write a letter.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  13. Re:90%+ for IE still by rseuhs · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, that's still 70% Microsoft... ;-)

  14. Don't forget the PS3 by rseuhs · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Playstation3 will use Linux for everything online-related. If it is as successful as PS1 (100 Million sold) or PS2 (30 million sold, another million sold EACH MONTH), there will be millions of Mozilla-users who won't accept a "use IE instead" because they *can't* use IE.

    Add to those:

    • 30 million of AOL users who will sooner or later upgrade to a Mozilla-based browser. Few computers last longer than 4 years, also Widows tends to be reinstalled sometimes even without upgrading hardware, so I guess that in 3 or 4 years we will see at least 20 million Mozilla-users coming from AOL.
    • Windows-users who like Mozilla's features (tabbed browsing, http-pipelining, stop animations)
    • Windows-users not liking Microsoft (actually I know more Windows-users hating Microsoft than liking them. Yes, you can flame me for this.)
    • Linux users. Yes it's starting to happen. South Korea switching 1/4 of their desktops to Linux, allmost all Hollywood studios switching to Linux, Walmart starting to sell Linux-preinstalled computers to the masses - this is just the beginning, Linux will make inroads in the desktop in the next years.
    • People who want a multiplatform browser. No, IE/Mac is not the same as IE/Win and see above for PS3 and Linux/desktop in the future. Those people who use any non-Windows OS either at work or at home will probably also use Mozilla on their Windows-machines because Mozilla makes it easier to share bookmarks etc. between platforms.
    • As the article suggests, people using embedded devices, etc.

    Mozilla will almost certainly break IE-domination in this year (by reaching more than 10% marketshare, which is too much to ignore for webdesigners) and will become the standard browser within 10 years.