Are You A Friend of Gnome?
From the donation page: "Love GNOME? Want to give back to the community of mostly volunteer developers who have worked so hard to make GNOME
the powerful, flexible, friendly, fun desktop that it is?" There are a number of contribution levels a person can join at, so if you love Gnome, consider helping the foundation out.
poor dude
Hello friends.
I am pleased to anounce that I'm looking for a girlfriend. Please read the requirements and if you're a girl who fits, or know any girl like this, you're more than welcome to answer me!
Thanks a bunch,
NaveWeiss
A few years ago, I recieved an email story about some guy that was jacked up on coke, and was masturbating while thinking about gnomes, and cut off his leg and shoved it up his asshole.... could you please post it here?
Thanks,
Jon Katz
Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered trolling community when recently Slashdot confirmed that, after several changes were made to production Slashcode, wide posts account for less than a fraction of 1 percent of all Slashdot posts. Coming on the heels of the latest verions of IE which make page-widening more difficult, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. the wide posts that we love are collapsing into the narrow posts that we are used to, as further exemplified by the lack of Slashbots complaining about difficulty reading Slashdot's articles.
You don't need to be a Klerck to predict PWP's future. The hand writing is on the wall: PWP faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for PWP because PWP is dying. Things are looking very bad for PWP. As many of us are already aware, PWP continues to be defeated by users with thresholds of 1 or higher. Mod points flow like a river of blood. Klerck's PWP-bot posts are the most endangered of them all, having been filtered early on because of their uniformity.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
PWP leader Klerck states that there are 7 wide posts in the average Slashdot article. How many non-wide crapflood posts are there? Let's see. The number of crapflood versus wide posts on Slahdot is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7*5 = 35 non-wide crapflood posts in every Slashdot article. Tacosnotting posts on Slashdot are about half of the volume of crapflood posts. Therefore there are about 17 tacosnotting posts per article. A recent article put Goatse.cx trolls at about 80 percent of total troll posts. Therefore there are a hell of a lot of homosexual trolls. This is consistent with the number of Goatse.cx Slashdot posts.
But Slashdot is only part of the picture. Due to the troubles at Slashdot, negative revenue and so on, the site will soon go out of business and many users will flock to alternative weblogs, where PWP is almost completely unknown. Trollaxor.com, the popular troll hangout, is also dying, its corpse sodomized in yet another Greek bath house.
All major surveys show that PWP has steadily declined in the scope of all troll posts. PWP is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If PWP is to survive at all it will be among Blog faggot using outdated versions of Slashcode. PWP continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, PWP is dead.
- poopbot: for the crapflooder in all of us
Well... you could say I'm convservative, but I'd prefer having sex with a normal girl. With she-males, you must use their ass since they don't have their middle-hole ready yet.. and besides.. probably they stink like a male and have to shave..
Why do you promote it so much? Are you an advocate from the Society For She-males Naturalization?
Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
Nave H. Weiss
So far you're the only one looking like an ass; not that I would ever expect a Slashdotter to recognize something like sarcasm. By the way, here's a few tips for you:
"It's such a subjective thing." Note the addition of an apostrophe.
"Hilarious," not "hillarious."
I won't even talk about the rest of the sentence, since it reads like head cheese from a blender. I'm sure you thought it was -real- clever though, didn't you?
I didn't realize Slashdot was being used as an open forum for people to solicit financial contributions these days. Even worse, the original post did not imply that financial contributions were required, and just say they needed 'help' and 'contributions'.
If GNOME needed more programmers, people to work on documentation, evangelists, etc.. then posting to Slashdot makes sense and I'm sure a lot of us would jump in.. but just having a post that solicits nothing but money is pathetic.
It's all about the money, it's all about the dum-dum-da-dum-dum-dum.
mogorific carpentry experiments
Ooooh. Slamming slashdot AND english tips - from an anonymous coward. We should all head back to our mom's basement and cry now. (sniff).