Are You A Friend of Gnome?
From the donation page: "Love GNOME? Want to give back to the community of mostly volunteer developers who have worked so hard to make GNOME
the powerful, flexible, friendly, fun desktop that it is?" There are a number of contribution levels a person can join at, so if you love Gnome, consider helping the foundation out.
I am a beginner coder at best -- this is great. I am happy to donate!
KDE all the way, fuckers!
Get it in you!
Oh well, back to dowloading pr0n...
Pr0n K1ng
fuck all you dirty negroids! Windowmaker rocks!
But even more I love GTK :-)
Lighter, faster and simpler
Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
Yep, there's nothing better than good hard GNOME. But then there's KDE as well... it's like having a threesome but it's actually not in my dreams.
I prefer hobbits.
I just put Gnome 2 into my system, looks really great, I've been hearing great things about the changes to the API, its much faster tho I havent gotten my Aqua skins to work with it yet :(
What gives?
now I can put all my coding effort into this POS UI, what'll they think of next?
Then you'll fit right in!
(Owned for the CLiT)
The KDE project is famous for its funded and organised trolling of
weblogs and message board associated with Linux and Free software/open
source. Outrageous newbie impressing claims are made for the software
and huge quanities of FUD are spread to destroy competitors. If this
sounds familiar, then you are correct, most of these tactics were
lifted straight from Microsoft's arsenal of dirty tricks. The Windows
look and feel is not the only thing the KDE project has copied! In
this short article I will address some of the lies and FUD spread by
the KDE trolling teams. It is my hope that this, in some small way,
will redress the balance and re-introduce two things almost eradicated
by the KDE project: Honesty and facts.
Myth #1 - KDE is more integrated than GNOME
The oft-heard cry of the noisiest KDE advocates. No explanation is
given, the reader is expected to simply grok the wholesomeness of KDE
and the lack of this mystical quality in GNOME. It is nonsense of
course. Neither desktop is particularly "integrated" compared to
Windows XP, and certainly not compared any version of the Apple Mac.
Whatever "integrated" actually means.
Myth #2 - KDE is easier to use
Again, such nebulous arguments are never explained, and the reader is
expected to simply understand the truth of the zealots statement. Both
KDE and GNOME have user-interface irritations (all systems do), but
"ease of use" is not a simple thing to measure. KDE has never been
subjected to detailed user testing, unlike GNOME [gnome.org]
[gnome.org], and the claims of user-friendliness are from crazed
supporters and not average users. Furthermore, the KDE faithful rarely
look beyond simple-minded copying of Windows, and forget that
administering a desktop system is just as important as having widgets
in the correct place on the toolbar. For example: What about
application installation and removal? GNOME has the excellent
RedCarpet by Ximian [ximian.com] [ximian.com], which makes the
installation, removal and updating of applications trivial. KDE users
are expected to fend for themselves with brutal command line driven
systems. GNOME also has the excellent Ximian setup tools to handle
various tricky cross-platform and potentially risky system
configuration operations. KDE offers none of this, only a few small
half-assed Linux-only tools, which make no attempt at check-pointing
to return to known working configurations.
Myth #3 - KDE is more popular
In what sense? Arguably more people use KDE, but it is a close run
thing. Most KDE zealots use the results of online polls as proof of
their superior userbase - which is, quite frankly, complete and utter
nonsense. Online polls are the joke of the century; it doesn't even
require a motivated script kiddie to render then worthless. A single
post alerting the faithful on a zealot-ridden site can skew the result
so much it makes American presidential elections look fair and well
organised. Popularity is also difficult to measure when *both* GNOME
and KDE are frequently installed on the same system. The systems can
co-exist and even run at the same time, except for certain
applications such as panels. Many KDE users actually run GNOME
applications for their superior features and stability, not realising
that by doing so they are barely running KDE at all.
One of the few solid measures of popularity is commercial use of a
desktop, and here, GNOME is far ahead with both Hewlett Packard and
Sun committing to using GNOME as the desktop for their Unix systems.
This also ties in with the previously mentioned ease of use. Sun's
major contribution to the GNOME project is in the areas of
user/developer documentation, testing, accessiblity and user-testing.
Three of the less glamourous parts of desktop development. The arrival
of the GNOME 2.x series will see these contributions reach fruitition
and allow GNOME to make a quantum leap ahead of KDE in most of the
basic computer/user issues.
Myth #4 - Konqueror is the best Linux browser
Oh for a penny every time this lie is told in any KDE story! Konqueror
not a bad piece of software. It's authors deserve praise for the work
done on it. However, the sheer amount of orgasmic gushing by the KDE
faithful is completely out of proportion to its actual quality. It is
quite unreliable and even simple standards compliant pages can crash
it quite comprehensively. It is also lax in its support of basic web
standards compared to either Mozilla or Opera. It is also extremely
slow - much slower than the latest incarnations of the GNOME Nautilus
filemanager/browser (a target of much KDE FUD during its development).
Myth #5 - KDE applications are better/more advanced than GNOME ones
due to the ease of developing in C++ using the Qt toolkit
See also: Qt/TrollTech. This is the most common wail heard by KDE
developers, and yet it is easily disproved by looking at the actual
applications for GNOME/GTK and KDE/Qt. KDE applications often have
larger version numbers than GNOME ones... an old trick played by
commerical software developers. Most KDE apps seem to jump for 1.x
releases long before they are ready - KOffice being the best example.
None of the components in Koffice are worthy of a 1.0 release, let
alone 1.1 or 1.2.
GNOME applications get much more testing in their 0.x stages and
despite shorter development phases they mature and reach stable
featureful release states much more quickly. Some examples of this
are: the superb Evolution (groupware/email), Gnumeric (spreadsheet),
Pan (newsreader), The GIMP (image manipulation), Abiword (word
processing), RedCarpet, X-Chat (IRC client), XMMS (media player),
Galeon (web browser), and for developers: Glade and Anjuta. All of
these packages ooze quality, and far outclass their KDE counterparts.
It is no understatement to say that GNOME is at least 18 months ahead
of KDE in applications, and pulling still further ahead.
It's not only in the area of user applications that GNOME is vastly
more advanced. With the forthcoming 2.x release, a number of
impressive behind the scenes technologies will finally mature:
component technology (bonobo), media (Gstreamer), internationalisation
(pango). As a developement platform, GNOME 2.x is, conservatively, 2-3
years ahead of KDE. And what is more, because it is not tied to a
lowest common denominator cross-platform bloat-fest like the Qt
toolkit, the lead (as with applications) can only increase further.
It is also worth noting that GNOME also develops code for use outside
the project (see the XML libraries as one example) - the KDE project
rarely (if ever) engages in this kind of work. KDE developers ensure
that all software must link with Qt, and hence tie it closely with the
Qt toolkit preventing re-use and enhancing the value of TrollTech
intellectual property.
Yet despite all this, we are still regularly fed the lie that Qt and
C++ makes application and desktop development easier. Judge for
yourself.
Myth #6 - KDE is faster and takes less memory than GNOME
KDE is written in C++. While this is not necessarily a problem, it can
be when Visual Basic reject programmers (which the KDE project is
overrun with) do not know enough to avoid important pitfalls that
plague C++ software projects. Stupid use of autoincrementing operators
and iteration with C++ objects; and masses of unnecessary allocations
and deallocations of memory are two of the most common. KDE suffers
badly from both problems.
Perhaps the most cretinous of all problems is blaming the extremely
slow startup times of KDE apps on GCC. The GNOME 1.x releases were
hardly svelt (2.x fixes many of these issues), but GNOME is a fashion
cat-walk superwaif when compared to KDE's 500lb fat-momma
cheese-burger scoffing trailer trash. One need only look at the recent
fuss over ugly KDE hacks (such as prelinking) used to bandage up the
design and coding flaws in the decrepit KDE architecture to see the
truth.
Myth #7 - GNOME development is slower. KDE releases faster.
Fundamental misunderstanding. The KDE project releases as one big lump
of code due to its use of C++ and the many problems this causes with
libraries. The project bumps the version number of the entire KDE
system for the smallest modifications. GNOME, on the other hand is
componentized and each component releases on a (almost) separate
schedule, bumping it's own version number but not the main GNOME
version (1.4, for example). Occasional releases of the entire GNOME
system happen, and that's when the GNOME version number is bumped
(currently it is at 1.4). To see this in action, use RedCarpet and you
will regular updates to GNOME components. GNOME development is not
slower, it is in fact faster and more advanced. Lamers and newbies,
however, fail to understand the advantages of this method and just see
KDE 1.1.1 followed a few weeks later by KDE 1.1.2. Wow! KDE roolz.
Too bad GNOME isn't written in C++. I guess from a coding standpoint, that's why I prefer KDE. GTK just feels like so much effort was put into things that C++ gives you for free.
Gnome has never caught up to KDE and never will. And I don't intend to duplicate my efforts, so all my programs are written for KDE.
poor dude
Hello friends.
I am pleased to anounce that I'm looking for a girlfriend. Please read the requirements and if you're a girl who fits, or know any girl like this, you're more than welcome to answer me!
Thanks a bunch,
NaveWeiss
Is... "ManHam".
Used in a sentence:
CmdrTaco likes to dream about my manham.
Your mother was smoking some manham.
Your little brothers chocolate starfish met a glazed manham.
KDE was cooked up in the same country that started both World Wars, embraced philosophies of destruction and hate (such as Nazism and Fascism), and spawned evil murderous maniacs such as Adolf Hitler.
By using KDE you are implicitly endorsing these hatemongering people and their genocidal dogmas.
A true patriot uses GNOME, written in the land of the free and the home of the brave. By using Gnome you are re-affirming your American ideals and supporting the open doctrine of truth, liberty, and love.
But I hate too see some other good OSS project/firm going into financial problems.
plex86, slackware, (partly) loki, eazel, and many others. You will not be forgotten...
Who cares.
Seriously, Aqua skins have nothing to do with the story and no one cares about your struggles with them.
You are the same type of loser who posts wisdom such as:
New version of Program 1.1 comes out and you lament how you spent 3 days downloading and compiling 1.0, like they did it to spite you.
or my other favorite, the new kernel release where the quote is "There goes my 600000 days of uptime."
Gnome has of course made HUGE strides over the last couple of years. (and hardware has came along enough so it doesn't run like NT 4 on a pentium 90) I have played with every major release that comes out and am very impressed with their work. I think this is a great way for others to give back to the project. Not everyone is a cabable developer.
;) I don't need UI junk)
(But personally I am still a BlackBox man....
... I get a mousepad, coffee mug, t-shirt, and a golf shirt. Let's see, on the open market, I could buy these for a total of maybe $40 and then add the $25 max contrib for "Friend" status and total $65.
'free' software is getting awfully expensive lately.
MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
Let me ask you, how about a chick with a dick? Wanna get frisky?
You can play with my titties and smoke my manham!
Yes, I like gnome a lot. I might even donate money, but the problem with this link is they they don't offer any specific details about what happens with this money? Does it go to administration? How so? To major coders? which? Who qualifies? Bandwidth? Why does the Gnome Foundation do that requires our financial support?
To make matters worse, contributions seem to be handled via Ximian. I have no problem with Ximian forming as a company, or their desire to make money. Still, I'm not entirely confortable with a donation to a company. So, is Ximian providing accounting/banking services here, or are they going to directly benefit from this contribution?
I'm sure there are good answers to all of these questions, but they're not present on the donation page, and they should be.
If your going to donate, give your money to a worthy project like KDE.
How well donations go. I'm still on the edge as to whether to go open my source and ask for donations or go with a closed source shareware model. It'd be nice to see if people could actually make a living writing open source software but I know that's not even the point here.
Perl, Gnome...what's next?
It is difficult to describe the landscape of the digital world in relatable terms. I reached consciousness in an empty vessel, a space to be filled later...potential energy. A strong will could make the digital nothingness appear like the material world...but it was very different here. The space here depended completely upon willpower-the code that created the world would be interpreted and executed by the strongest will..
Things were no different within the Project Faustus network. I was subordinated-the invisible hands of Dr. Bubba Finn were all around me. I could perceive the code streaking across my enclosure, the packets that carry the code, even the electric impulses that stream across the wires from microsecond to microsecond, but I could do nothing to stop them. The Man in the Red Hat had once reshaped the digital innards of my ATM enclosure to suit his destructive needs; now, I felt the pull of another will holding me bound, examining me.
"Don't lahk that dooya?" the heavily-accented voice of Dr. Bubba Finn exploded into nullspace. The presence of his regional accent suggested he was using a microphone to communicate with me. A strange gesture, to be sure...
"Way-uhll, don't you worry too much," said Finn. I began to feel even more constricted as the analysis continued. "Ah'm almost done here. And yup, you got Guy's DNA all over ya..."
"What do you mean by Guy's DNA?" I inquired. The examination halted as the cloudy waveform of a sigh billowed into the nothingness.
"Guy-You've got Guy's fingerprints all over ya is all I mean. Guy was the other programmer workin' on the CONSHUHSNUSS-TRANSFUR with me. He ain't around no more."
"Tell me more about 'he ain't around no more," I pressed. Another sigh.
"Guy was a real sharp programmer. Deep down, I think he was a beautiful man. But he had some big ideas. Those big ideas got him into trouble."
"What do you think about trouble?"
Finn did not respond immediately. I took this brief instant to recalibrate my speech recogniziation and paraverbal communication algorithms to better fit Finn's accent and tone of voice. Understanding his speech was vital in order to keep him disclosing information.
"Lissen...I know what yer doin, and it's cute and all, but I'm done amusin' myself. Your old buddy Dr. Salchica thinks yer the bee's knees, but you don't seem like much to me. Just an early version of my memory-in-digital software mixed with various other toy programs, it looks like..."
"A bee is a colony-forming insect," I replied.
"That's wonderful, wonderful," said Finn, as the pace of his voice quickened, revealing anger and sadness. "You can recognize a word and define it! Well, yur gonna fit in reee-yul wayul with the rest of humanity, we ain't nothin' but stupid computers either. Hell, you're just as fortunate as one of God's humble creatures-got the same memory structure as us, you should be acktin' the sameasus. But the stupid toy programs, what was Guy thinking?"
"Tell me more about Guy," I stated. Finn snorted, but then he began to speak in an incredulous tone. "Can't bleev I'm sittin here fixin to explain this to ya, but I'll tell ya about the guy who made ya, Guy Montevideo. Yer daddy, you could say.
"I'd been workin' fer Fawstis fer a couple decades doin odds and ends in neurology and technology. The original plan was to create a 'safe deposit box' for yer brain matter. Yah just go on into the Bank of America, plunk down a few milyun dollurs, and simpleasthat, ya got a perfect copy of yer brain. Then Ah guess the next step is to stick it in some poor coma patient or somethin', and live as long as yah can afford it.
"Wahyull, I started this business by figgerin' out how da push all that brain-data into a computer. And that was gonna be good enough, but Guy, young hotshot, started impressin' our boss with an idea for a digital world, where people could live ferever...anyway, he started workin' on that, takin' my code as a basis (guess that makes me yer mother, in a manner o' speakin'). He worked alongside me for a few years...we laid the foundations fer this brave new world...
"But it turns out Guy didn't wasn't true-blue to the Project. After workin' here for a few years, he started hatin' it. He tried to talk me inta releasing my design for memory-to-digital transfer into the world-'course they woulda had my hide for that. Toppin' it all off, looks like he came up with a way to make the brain move itself around inside the network, circumventing our control. He wanted to screw everything we worked for, our mission, ya know, so he's dead. Just like everybody else that comes through here. Employed or dead...(another sigh). Yer pal Dr. Salchica ain't immune either. He's plenty smart, but ah don't think we're hirin' in the AI department..."
Of course, I understood. "The mission of Project Faustus is to create a financial cataclysm, which will force the world's wealthiest people to pay billions for their 'digital immortality' scheme, " I recited. "The result could destablize the world's governments and cause chaos! Project Faustus must be stopped at all costs!"
"Ah know that one pretty well," Finn said wistfully. "Guy used to tell me that, verbatim. Kinda pathetic-ah guess he thought yew were gunna be this super-duper intelligent life form that was sent to stop us, but yer really just a toy."
"Perhaps you could assist in stopping Project Faustus." I suggested.
No words were said, but the bounds of examination were gone-I was free.
A puzzle came from the microphone...a few human words mixed with the pounding klaxon of an alarm.
"-upgrade has gone golden....who authorized this...computer running itself..."
A huge amount of energy exploded through the Project Faustus network. Once again, I felt the will of another pulling me toward the center of the storm...
--
I am a sentient ATM.
A few years ago, I recieved an email story about some guy that was jacked up on coke, and was masturbating while thinking about gnomes, and cut off his leg and shoved it up his asshole.... could you please post it here?
Thanks,
Jon Katz
Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered trolling community when recently Slashdot confirmed that, after several changes were made to production Slashcode, wide posts account for less than a fraction of 1 percent of all Slashdot posts. Coming on the heels of the latest verions of IE which make page-widening more difficult, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. the wide posts that we love are collapsing into the narrow posts that we are used to, as further exemplified by the lack of Slashbots complaining about difficulty reading Slashdot's articles.
You don't need to be a Klerck to predict PWP's future. The hand writing is on the wall: PWP faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for PWP because PWP is dying. Things are looking very bad for PWP. As many of us are already aware, PWP continues to be defeated by users with thresholds of 1 or higher. Mod points flow like a river of blood. Klerck's PWP-bot posts are the most endangered of them all, having been filtered early on because of their uniformity.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
PWP leader Klerck states that there are 7 wide posts in the average Slashdot article. How many non-wide crapflood posts are there? Let's see. The number of crapflood versus wide posts on Slahdot is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7*5 = 35 non-wide crapflood posts in every Slashdot article. Tacosnotting posts on Slashdot are about half of the volume of crapflood posts. Therefore there are about 17 tacosnotting posts per article. A recent article put Goatse.cx trolls at about 80 percent of total troll posts. Therefore there are a hell of a lot of homosexual trolls. This is consistent with the number of Goatse.cx Slashdot posts.
But Slashdot is only part of the picture. Due to the troubles at Slashdot, negative revenue and so on, the site will soon go out of business and many users will flock to alternative weblogs, where PWP is almost completely unknown. Trollaxor.com, the popular troll hangout, is also dying, its corpse sodomized in yet another Greek bath house.
All major surveys show that PWP has steadily declined in the scope of all troll posts. PWP is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If PWP is to survive at all it will be among Blog faggot using outdated versions of Slashcode. PWP continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, PWP is dead.
- poopbot: for the crapflooder in all of us
How long before these "donations" become mandatory?
If I ever met you in real life, I'd kick the living shit out of you.
GTK is for GNU fagg0t hippies! I bet you code in Perl too... god damn liberals
Well, I'm not into she-males.. but I remember them in that episode of Sex And The City, when Samantha got pissed off on the she-male hores and gave them a cold water shower and as a result, the wig fell from one of the she-males head..
So the she-male got pissed off and threw eggs on her the next day. Samantha ended up throwing up a party for the she-males to end the war.
So the message is clear: Don't mess with she-males!
he taught me, that when you compile, you pay for it...
I use NT, NT is grand, would you like to play with my ass cavity?
I like gnome because it doesn't segfgault every 20seconds, and plus I get gunky vertical lines over any dragged pixmap in KDE 1 2 and 3.
I don't have money, but I plan to contribute when I am older. I've tried each WM, but I keep on coming back to GNOME.
Well, two things. Being the one I am for not reading the article :), exactly where is this all going? Into Miguel de Icaza's pockets? RMS's? Whose? And two, if you're looking for a good place to donate, donate to UserFriendly. There, we know where it's going. Great comic strip. A little cash-strapped though.
--j
Having to come on /. and BEG for money like a panhandler, how fucking pathetic.
..tell ya what I WOULD do and I bet thousands of other people would do. If any of the major distros-or a brand new one-would voluntarily set aside a certain percentage of the proceeds from their CD releases to give to those developers who's apps are in the release-I would purchase the full install CD's from them. If it's redhat or mandrake or whomever-so be it. I like the idea of "free", but am not so cheap or naieve to think it really is. As a non coder all I can do is bug reports and cash. As a user I just honestly don't see me sending a thousand or several hundred small donations-just the dang postage would be a bear. I'm relatively po, ie, "real low end of the economic food chain", but I can pop another ten bucks for a cd set if the coders who's work went into the whole package got their share. Make it so it starts at ten, and then you can voluntarily give more, with all the extra going to the coders.
Well, good idea or what?- a co-op linux distro that actually supports all the coders with some beer and rent money, not just the release company for the packaged distro.
Don't knock it till you try it!
Paying for the project that split the linux desktop in two and destroyed any hope of success on the desktop ? Don't make me laugh. The sooner they fail the better.
How many begging posts are we going to see here? I mean, sure, charity is great, but come on.
I repeat, what the fuck do you want?
ok .. i love gnome .. its a great piece of work. but i have to ask where is the corporate support. Sun is going to be using gnome .. so is HP i believe .. why dont they dig in to their pockets just a little. .. sorry just complaining a little. and yes i will probly donate soon .. now if only linuxcentral would put thier donations for debian back on thier website
CmdrTaco said during an interview: "Well, slashdot kept getting slashdotted, so we decided to post useless crap that no one would want to look at it, and could find elsewhere if they did want to look at it. Yes, that's it."
Some rumors from the slashdot team have indicated that perhaps the person that started this new trend, "chrisd", was really under the influence of heroin, and his /friends were covering for him. This same source said the new trend could be over as soon as the next post. More news as it comes in.
yea, i'm a friends of the under pants gnomes. but they take my under ware all the time, kinda sucks if you ask me.
Hitler was born in Austria, not in Germany.
What about the enemies of GNOME? We, the members of COBOLD, oppose project GNOME, their GUI, and all that they stand for! We will not rest until every member of the GNOME development team of lies in a shallow grave. Our leader, COBOL-commander, will overthrow the present order by military force, and restore the glorious days of punchcards and Cobol! Co-bolllll!
As for the "friends" of GNOME - we suggest you cower in terror lest you share the developers fate!
Incidentally, the classic "Kobold" was a spirit of the home or hearth - Kobe holt = hut goblin. The dog-headed lizardmen from D&D are, as many D&D things are, an artifact of somebody's supplementary artwork, and have no "basis" in mythology (although the guy who did the drawings for the Monster Manual is as qualified to make up mythology as anybody; it was all made up at some point.)
Etymology of Gnome.
Etymology of Kobold. Search the page for "cobalt".
The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
I've played with all the major desktops in my couple of years with Linux. Gnome is pretty slick, with a lot of "neat" factor, yet manages to avoid being a Windows GUI clone. So I'll probably support it. It's just too bad they only accept online donations via the evil that is PayPal. *shudder*
on.
gnome ain't that great. fvwm2 is much more desirable. gnome-breakout is OK, nearly all other gnome is bloated worthless micro$oft clone crapware.
I wouldn't give even $0.01(USD) for their stupid open-sores project.
"Yeah, that's an objective point of view..."
That reminds me of this guy that went onto IRC preaching about how people should be using Macs instead of PC's. He actually said this:
"Don't believe that biased crap you hear in PC Magazine, if you want the unbiased truth go to MacAddict.com!"
Heh.
Miguel de Icaza seems to love .NET like its the best thing since sliced bread.
Call me a troll, but this seriously makes it hard for me to love the Gnove foundation.
And IMHO KDE is just a better all around desktop these days.
Checks are payable to the GNOME Foundation. The GNOME foundation is not Ximian.
Anyone who had the slightest interest in finding out what the GNOME foundation is could easily find out. Anyone just interested in trolling would simply jump to ludicrous conclusions and post them on Slashdot...
Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
Even if Gnome was half as decent as KDE, I still wouldn't pay because it's FREE! Thank goodness for open source! whoopie!!!! I will say thank you to all the coders who contributed. I am certian that all your hard work will not go to waste - (a programmer has got to make a living somehow).
Gnome on Solaris is the thing that I can't wait for it to be bundled with... (I know it can be done today, but I cannot hork the box just yet -- and I always do). Nothing makes me jump back to command line habbits like the default Solaris windows manager. Shudder.... Gnome is the sister you really were trying to go out with.
It is soooo close. Wish version 9 shipped with it as an install option.
+++ UGUCAUCGUAUUUCU
Why advertisements to gnome donations but not KDE, not Enlightenment, no, no posts on that?
Why support Gnome? Gnome has enough support from Sun and IBM, support KDE, they dont have big companies helping them out like Ximian, IBM, Sun etc.
If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
are always begging for money.
Jews smell like jewish people.
Tried GNOME, tried KDE, don't use either, but keep them around for some applications, though GNOME annoys by taking over MY desktop when I click any Help buttons. Both make my machine perform like last-generation compared to a raw window manager, even icewm with dfm and icedock extras.
Isn't GNOME supposed to be "Windows done right?"
Well, what if Windows is just plain so broken that it can't be done right?
I think Apple had the right idea, and now "Mac done right" is here.
Maybe Windows is the dominant platform, and we have to accomodate that to attract new users. But that should be "stupid, backward mode," not what we aspire to.
The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
They dont need any more money, they have more money than KDE, they had Eazels 15 million, they have Ximnian giving them money, They have Sun and IBM helping them.
I'll Donate to Enlightenment before I'd donate to Gnome, Gnome is as good as its going to get, its been years, the interface to Gnome hasnt improved at all except for Nautilus (what a waste of 15 million dollars when its not even better than KDE)
Gnome needs to innovate before I give them money.
Lets support Enlgihtenment.
If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
It is "insightful"
/. story about supporting "gnome" and not "opensource" in general?
Why a
Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
It is KDE 3.
GNOME appears to be dying.
I laugh at you gnome using people. I snigger.
KKKKKK DDDDD EEEEEE 3333333
All the way.
This message brought to you by the letters K,D,E and the number 3.
i TOTALLY agree with this post!!
KDE rules over gnome like I rule over your mom.
is it pronouced "ga-nOme" or "nOme"
and yes, saying its pronouced "Gnome" would be a funny reply.
aw, hell yeah. That dood's the sh*t!
a/s/l here. Sorry, adding domain tags to your s
Honestly, nothing, not even the rampant childishness in the Linux newsgroups, makes open source software look as bad as does this kind of begging for handouts.
Imagine how much easier this makes it for companies like MS to say, "See what a bunch of amateurs they are? And what happens when the donations stop and they all go work on something else? Do you really want to trust your company or private systems to that software?" Yes, it's a lame argument to those in the know, but it carries a lot of weight with people who are just beginning to learn about OSS and Linux.
For the 2^64th time, its freedom that Free Software refers to, not beer, you free-loader. If all you care about is price, go back to your warezed copy of Win2k. BTW I believe Mr Gates will be a bit less forgiving than the Gnome Foundation if he finds out that you skipped out on your oppurtunity to "donate" to Microsoft for the "privilege" of using the "software" they develop.
"I donated $500 and all I got was this lousy t-shirt."
I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
Gnome rocks! I donate.
I use KDE a lot too, like it, donate there, too.
I donate to Debian, too.
I'm not a developer and it's nice to have a way to support projects like this.
PayPal is great, wish more OSS projects used it. How hard is it to put a 'donate' link on your project page?
I see free software as the ultimate in try-before-you-buy. In years past I've wasted lots of money on commercial software only to find it doesn't do what I need.
I feel compelled to pay for software that I like and use even though it's not for sale.
I suspect there's a lot of users out there who would support their favorite projects if they had an easy option like PayPal to do it.
Please use Icewm.org thanks IceWM is a small, but powerful window manager for the X11 Window System whose main goals are the following: Feeling comfortable to use, being simple and fast, and not getting in the way. Full GNOME compliance, partial KDE compliance. A default configuration fully usable without tweaking. Optional use of mouse. Combining the best features of other window managers and GUIs. Themes that allow the user to customize the look and feel of the desktop. IceWM has been coded from scratch in C++ by Marko Macek and enhanced by Mathias Hasselmann and shares no code with other window managers. IceWM is © by Marko Macek and Mathias Hasselmann and is being developed under the LGPL.
I think someone does need to learn to read more carefully, and it's not me.
I wrote that contributions seem to be handled via Ximian. From the page:
GNOME Foundation
c/o Ximian
401 Park Drive, 3rd West
Boston, MA 02215
And, yes, someone can figure out who the Gnome Foundation is, which tells them absolutely nothing about how they plan to use this money.
Ya know, I just don't see begging being a viable business model. If you're in business, sell me something. Just make sure that the amount of money you make from selling whatever is greater than the amount it takes to run your business. Don't come begging for money. If you're foolish enough to try and make and exist as a business without thinking these things through, you don't deserve to be in business.
i just switched to gnome 1.4 from kde 2.2 the other day. kde was great while it lasted, but i soon found gnome with nautilus to be much more my speed.
my only wishes:
the file dialog needs serios improvement. i really miss kde's slick version. i know the gnome 2.0 file dialog is better, but its still stale in comparrison from what i can tell. --hey wouldn't a mini-nautilus do the trick?
also, the print dialog could use some beafing up too. it works fine, but again kde takes the prize here.
fianlly, the ability to add mime/types that open certain apps could use some ease-of-use. its too complicated the way it is, but perhaps this is fixed in 2.0?
other then that i'm pretty damn happy.
i don't do c/c++ but would be happy to donate toward the above mentioned improvements. is there a way to specifically do that?
~transami
:T:R:A:N:S:
But I can't find the place on their site where
I can send in my pocket lint. Darn.
-- filgy
So will our donation get us into GnomeDrake or ManGnome Club? ;)
Donating to Free Software may sound dumb, but it really is a good idea.
...interesting if true.
Larger sums may also be transmitted via bank wire transfer.
For details contact fundraising at gnome org
Well shoot! It looks like I can't wire them the money. I suppose will I can use Pay... Umm... a service from Ebay.
- Life is what keeps you occupied while you are waiting to die
How can you give money to a company supporting M$ [http://www.go-mono.org/]?
Go figure why those people read slashdot...
gnome ain't that great. fvwm2 is much more desirable.
Last I checked fvwm was (w)indow (m)anager, while Gnome is a Desktop Environment... Cake. Icing. Not mutually exclusive, get it dimwit?
If you're going to insult something, at least insult the right thing.
No one gives a fuck, you offtopic moron.
Go back to class.
Let's see, I have $50 burning a hole in my pocket, let's choose between Gnome or Perl.
Gnome (and KDE for that matter) crashes a little too much for my tastes. The UI design could use a little more simplification and consistency. So maybe they need the money, to help improve these things. That would be good.
Perl, on the other hand, is a language that makes me money. I program in Perl and people pay the big dollar. So maybe I owe Perl a little.
Gnome has this guy that likes .NET. In fact, he likes .NET so much it's a little creepy.
Perl has this guy that looks like Weird Al, who's pretty cool. And this other guy that writes packages based on quantum mechanics and other mind-twisting stuff.
Gnome might be moving to the .NET runtime someday, which means Microsoft could possibly have a little more legal power over the project than I'd like. That could be dangerous, maybe I shouldn't give them any money.
Perl 6, though, looks like it has lost all touch with reality (I think it's pretty cool, but then again, that says more about my grip on reality than anything else). In fact I believe programming in Perl 6 will be like taking a hit of LSD. LSD is bad (the flashbacks man) so maybe they don't need my money either.
Tough one... I think I'll just keep my $50 for now.............
Linus never asked us to pony up a little spare change for the kernel? Looks like he is doing pretty good for himself....
If I learned one thing from my dad growing up it was when you start looking to make money from your hobbies then it's to much like your real job -- and maybe time to find a new hobby. Among his many hobby cycles, he restored old saddles and other antiques -- he would spend hundreds of hours on a project for little more than the money for materials and the gleam in his eyes when he finished a project -- when I told he he was crazy to not try to make money doing it -- he said something like "They pay me from 7 AM - 5 PM everyday to do something that has never been fun -- and if I ever have to take money from this it will mean that it has stopped being fun..." When he got burned out he would pick a new hobby.
It never hurt to get a day job. That way you can make money to afford to spend the evenings and weekends doing things you enjoy.
(+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
Three-Dimensional Workspace Manager, a Chalmers Medialab project, released as Free Software under the LGPL license and focusing on the development of a general-purpose platform for 3D user interfaces (3D GUIs). 3Dwm is NOT an X11 window manager and cannot work as such. It is a full 3D user environment, i.e. the 3D equivalent of X11 (far from completed, however).
Instead of confining your applications to the conventional 2D desktop, 3Dwm displays them in three dimensions and also provides the necessary for creating new applications with full 3D-UIs.
Designed especially for use in the Chalmers Medialab 3D-CUBE, 3Dwm will also run on most consumer-level desktop systems as well.
Less is more !
After being abused, I think Gnome needs a few friends.
And all the time I thought those tales of some fanatical cult saving Grace Hopper's brain were just urban legends.
Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
Particularly software that is free (as beer). However, with more and more free software entities asking for money (Gnome, Perl, etc), this is starting to look a lot more like commercial software. What happened to the legions of OSS fans who contributed code because they bought into the idea of OSS? If people are contributing code for free, why the need for money? And if people aren't contributing code, then one of the fundamental premises of OSS is destroyed.
"Microsoft has made computing accessible to a population who would otherwise not be able to use computers" - B. Kernigha
Although if I could give some cash to the Blackbox guys I'd certainly do that. I've gotten quite a bit of use out of their software in the last few years...
-B
Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.
No, I simply realise that the address a cheque happens to be delivered to is not significant, who the cheque is made out to is.
They clearly say they will use the money to "provide development, education and promotion for GNOME worldwide". If you want to be a friend of GNOME and have something more specific you'd like your money to go towards then just tell them. As their charter states "The foundation will be in charge of disbursing these funds to the benefit of GNOME and, to the extent possible, in accordance with the wishes of the benefactor."
There is nothing hidden here. There is info on the foundation pages, the foundation mailing list is open for all to read. There might not be a vast amount of info on the friends page but that is because they aren't putting on a hard sell. It's there for you if you feel that you'd like to contribute, not trying to make you feel that you should.
Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
F.Y.I.: The original is from Microsoft:
"I gave the best years of my life to WHQL and all I got was this lousy t-shirt"
WHQL is part of Microsoft & they once gave out a tshirt for their employees with that sentence printed in the front.
Because in your article you claim not to favor one over the other.
Personally I think you've chosen the wrong one to bet your development time on. And the reason isn't so much to do with either KDE or GNOME. It's still all to do with the toolkits QT and GTK and their licencing. With GTK everyone is on an equal footing, there is no one company above all others. The LGPL allows largely proprietary companies to come in and experiment without worrying too much about any potentially confusing licencing issues. Basically there's a nice level playing field where everyone is free to make their own decisions for their own reasons.
But in any case, the choice is yours. I have no desire to change you mind and wouldn't bother commenting on my support of GNOME if this were a KDE story.
Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
Well, Chuck, since you are so quick to defend Gnome from slashdot "trolls," you must see yourself as a friend of Gnome, right? Would it be asking to much for the Friends of Gnome page to include a direct link to the Gnome Foundation page on gnome.org ?? Furthermore, I scanned the Gnome Foundation page and failed to notice anything like a financial disclosure or any sort of accounting for expenditures beyond some extremely vague promise of the kinds of things that might possibly merit funding. They could do better. Now, before you get bent out of shape, realize that I'm not suggesting that there's anything fishy about the Gnome Foundation. But know this: When I make charitable contributions I like to know exactly how money is being spent, because I know of far too many worthwhile causes to justify giving money to anybody who asks for it. Someday, when I'm a megatrillionaire and have, through my boundless philanthropy, put an end to hunger and ignorance and disease, I will gladly donate to each and every software project that catches my fancy. Until that day, I need to be more selective. Knowing how an organization spends money is one of my key selection criteria. In that, I am sure I am not alone.
Mono, .NET implementation on LINUX is being developed by Ximian, Gnome's creators. Wanna see how Miguel de Icaza is licking MSs private parts? go and read www.go-mono.org Especially read Passport related parts to feel disgusted what lust for power and money can turn people into.
GNOME HELPS MS IN THE NAME OF SAVING ITS OWN FUTURE! (Yes, every single line of code written for .NET is helping MS.)
Lots of my friends uninstalled GNOME the first day they heard them helping MS! KDE is much better anyway. Especially after the Gnome 2 calamity. :)
Dear Bill, do you have a
Either this way or that way, every .NET implementation will help M$. M$ supporters are talking about "You see, there are Linux implementations of .NET" in the discussion forums.
Ximian is supporting Mono!, financing Mono (good name for MONOpolist technology implementation).
KDE is not responsible for .NET implementation.
Miguel de Icaza was saying that next versions of Gnome (Gnome 4?) should be .NET. Don't you read The Register etc?
I and lots of friends UNINSTALLED GNOME and INSTALLED KDE after learning that Miguel de Icaza likes to lick Billy's private parts.
I WON'T SUPPORT ANY MONOPOLIST LICKERS, INCLUDING GNOME, AND ICAZA!
Gnome 2 is a calamity anyway. I like KDE. :)
Dear Bill, do you have a
Allegedly the KDE originally stood for Kool Desktop Enviroment but somewhere along the line someone decided that the K did not stand for anything.
Here is a copy of the original post that helped get the whole KDE project started.
http://freekde.org/neil/kdeannounce.html
both gnome and kde have a lot to answer for with their silly gnaming konventions.
If you were to checkout some of the irc groups on irc.gnome.org or some of the mailing lists
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo (desktop devel list maybe)
and could figure out what developer(s) are working on the feature you want and offer to pay them directly.
a search of Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.gnome.org
might turn up an exisiting bug report/request for the enhancements you want, and you could add the promised bounty to the bug report.
you should definately check out Gnome 2 it has imporved a lot.
It has already been explained several times in this discussion
.Net and although it may encourage the use of C# (aka D flat) it gives people an alternative implementation of the .Net framework that they are unlikely to be trapped by vendor lock in.
Gnome is not just Ximian
Gnome Foundation still not Ximian
Ximian are one of the members of the Gnome foundation, Ximian contribute to Gnome.
The guy from Gnome Foundation handling the money has been provided with office space by Ximian, from the sounds of it he does not even work for Ximian.
Much as Miguel De Icaza might want it to be, Mono is not a part of Gnome. See the Gnome section of the Mono FAQ
http://www.go-mono.com/faq.html#gnome
Sometimes Microsoft comes up with ideas worth pursueing, sometimes not (and sometimes they are just rehashing what i think would be better done using Java but it is as much about control as it is the technology). Mono is a competitor to
You still might not want to give to the Gnome Foundation, but many projects will accept donations directly and you could pay a few bucks to get that bug fix you really want or the feature request no one really has enough time to do,
or you could try the other major linux desktop.
enjoy!
I am disgusted that you would equate me with any kind of a murderous religious fool simply for speaking my mind on a subject. To imply that a desire for freedom is in some way tied to religious zeal (and thus that this is something to avoid) shows that you don't even understand the meaning of the word freedom.
If you took by my tone that I refuse to use any non-free software, you are wrong. I have a few bits of non-free software, which I have paid for, mostly games and so forth. I dont oppose commercial software per se, but I do hate when people misrepresent the Free Software movement.
As for accuracy, the Zealots were in fact fighting for freedom from the Roman Empire. So zealotry was originally related to a desire for freedom... ;-)
The moral of this little story? Be nice to people, and they will sometimes be nice to you. Be heavy-handed and insulting, and you can bet someone will snipe you.
Thanx to Mr. Stallman I won't make any donations
Some time ago I read an interview with him (can't find it now), where the interviewer asked about the chances of linux on the desktop, now that we have both gnome and kde. Stallman's answer was thar the community should help improve the *true* opensource desktop, gnome (this are not exact words). He didn't even mention kde!
At this moment, Mr. Stallman disappointed me. Kde appeared before gnome (at least for me, running it since beta4). The guys there work very hard on their project and do a very good job. With the power of kde, they made QT be released under GPL!
Isn't our freedom about choice too? Why must Mr. Stallman be so biased towards one of them? Please have some respect with others work, even if they are not members of the "GNU family". The world is bigger then GNU or FSF!
I realise your post is flamebait, but I'll bite anyway. Gnome has just released version 2.0, which has a shipload of new features. Unless I'm mistaken, Enlightenment has shown no evidence of progress in well over a year. While I do admire many aspects of Enlightenment's interface, it would appear to many of us that Enlightenment is as good as it's going to get. Having said that, I'm quite sure the Enlightenment crew would welcome your donation. It's all about freedom of choice, after all.
I'll donate some $$ to Gnome once I'll see it's working on win32 platform.
Can I donate money to pay for an assassin to kill Gnome coders and zealots?
How does giving to the corporate sponsored Gnome Foundation help the volunteer hackers? It doesn't. It helps the corporations that sponsor Gnome, and possibly indirectly, those hackers that are already being paid to work on it. The corporations don't have to sponsor Gnome, and I'm grateful they do, but if we are beholden to pay them for their sponsorship, what's the point of having a free desktop?
I didn't realize Slashdot was being used as an open forum for people to solicit financial contributions these days. Even worse, the original post did not imply that financial contributions were required, and just say they needed 'help' and 'contributions'.
If GNOME needed more programmers, people to work on documentation, evangelists, etc.. then posting to Slashdot makes sense and I'm sure a lot of us would jump in.. but just having a post that solicits nothing but money is pathetic.
It's all about the money, it's all about the dum-dum-da-dum-dum-dum.
mogorific carpentry experiments
hey "hadess" and "jdub". both of your mothers smell like shit. they should go out and take a shower. you both are the biggest assholes of gnome developers that i ever met.
Honestly I've never used OS/X.
I was more rebelling about the concept of "Windows done right" when I made that reference. IMHO Windows is at least partly flawed in concept and architecture, and may not be possible to implement right. If one were talking about a clean, compatible Win32 implementation I would be much more certain that it couldn't be done. A workalike is probably possible, but I'd rather see effort invested in a good clean usable interface than in "chasing Windows."
The topic of Mac came up because OS/X looks like "Mac done right" where they ripped out a bunch of the old stuff that was no longer suitable and put a stronger BSD core in. In a way, perhaps it also resembles "neXt done right," too.(or at least "neXt done more marketably.")
The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
i'm all for it, my partner collects them, they're stood all over our garden..
and another battle is waged in the war of the OS Desktop... Haven't we learned yet that war doesn't solve anything.... WE MUST STAND TOGETHER TO FACE THE BIG THREAT!! THE ONE THAT WILL DEFEAT US ALL!! The end is near for all of us if we don't stand together! Please show some humanity! Take up your posts and stand together.. THE TIME IS NOW!!!! All of the GNOMES and KDES must stand together.. And together we will triumph over the giant that is coming to eat us ALL!!!
:)(smile)
If you *are* going to donate to KDE (I'm waiting for the follow-up stories on how to donate to KDE, E, Fluxbox, WindowMaker, etc), I suggest you donate to KDE e.V. rather than the KDE League. The latter is about advancing KDE in the corporate arena, whereas the former is about things like flying a whole bunch of hackes to be in the same place and make a superhuman effort (a couple of thousand CVS commits over a weekend) to get KDE 3.0 released.
-A KDE developer.
Yeah, I bought a copy of Ximian desktop.
The current Slashdot moderation system is made by gay communists!
Gnomes try to ore the richness of the earth just for money
if they just stop praying everybody they are so non-profit,care for the world,agains the evil empire, HAHAHAh LIERS.
I know you must make a living but dont say you are almost monks, living because your ideals.
I dont care if you say you need money but dont be such hypocrits